|
As the child of Brooklyn Dodger fans, i'm never in favor of a team abandoning a fan base so an owner can make more money elsewhere.
Basically, owners own a "franchise"; that is, the right to operate a team in a specific location, under the umbrella of league guidelines and regulations. The way a radio/cable/tv company has the right to operate a channel on a certain band/frequency/channel of public airwaves, or a public utility has the right to run its power lines/pipe lines in a certain region. If an owner doesn't like having a team in the city he's in, he should be required to sell the team to another owner in that locale. If there is no buyer, he can only sell his franchise back to the league (at a discounted rate), who can then sell the team (i.e., its existing contracts and properties) to an owner in whatever city they deem has the best ability to support a MLB franchise (but, without requiring the city to pay for a billionaire's ballpark!) -- it may be the original city, or some other that has put together a solid proposal for MLB to consider.
I'd love to see another team in Montreal, but not at the expense of Tampa, unless the TB owner sells the franchise back to the league and the league deems that Tampa has been unable or unwilling to support a franchise and Montreal has a superior proposal. I don't want to see a TB owner carpetbag his way to big profits at that community's expense.
As long as MLB has an anti-trust exemption, i'd like to see them use their power to benefit the greatest number of fans and communities, not just individual billionaires. If their just going to employ their exemption for their own enrichment, then screw them and repeal the exemption, and let them compete in an open market.
| 
