Master Index of Archived Threads
Inside Pitch Prospect Ranking Issue
Edgy DC Feb 18 2006 11:38 PM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
They don't include guys without US pro experience, so Alain Soler, Mike Pelfrey, and Fernando Martinez are on the outside looking in --- which is tough, because their all counted on in different ways to shore up a system depleted by trades, so absent them a plus sleeper like Carlos Gomez shoots all the way to number two. Iriki isn't even in time for press.
Not the most definitive source, but not the least either. Among the banishees, they report that they would have had Mike Jacobs at number four, Peit at five, Gaby Hernandez 10, Grant Psomas at 27 and Dante Brinkley at 28. I guess Maine came too late for press. Others on their fringe list (besides Pelfrey, Martinez, Soler and Deolis Guerra) include:
|
TheOldMole Feb 18 2006 11:54 PM |
Doesn't look good for Scarlett's baby Joe.
|
DocTee Feb 19 2006 12:06 AM |
Jeff Kepinger: fifth best 2B prospect in system?
|
Edgy DC Feb 19 2006 12:21 AM |
Fourth, as the Rangers claimed Aarom Baldiris on waivers a few weeks ago. But he appears to be riper --- and therefore higher on the depth chart --- than the three guys ahead of him.
|
Nymr83 Feb 19 2006 01:26 AM |
Hernandez and Keppinger should have been 5 and 6 on the simple basis that nobody below there stands to see any significant time in the majors in the next few years while either of them could conceivably see 400 ABs this year if Boone gets cut and Matsui shows he can't hit in April/May
|
KC Feb 19 2006 08:57 AM |
I don't see how you can list Mets prospects and not include Pelfrey. BA
|
Yancy Street Gang Feb 19 2006 09:48 AM |
|
|
MFS62 Feb 19 2006 09:53 AM |
I'd guess they rate "tools", and "potential" highly instead of already demonstrated baseball ability, because of how high Gomez and Bowman are rated.
|
ScarletKnight41 Feb 19 2006 10:14 AM |
|
What do they know?
|
Frayed Knot Feb 19 2006 12:08 PM |
|
Most list-makers try to find a balance. They generally want to target the guys ceiling and temper that with the likelihood of him actually reaching that level. So guys like Keppinger, while they might be closest to ready, get dropped on lists because few think he'll advance a whole lot beyond what he already is.
|
Edgy DC Feb 19 2006 12:13 PM |
Ragsdale is up because he hit 19 homers last year, and a handful of guys who might be in front of him are gone.
|
KC Feb 19 2006 12:41 PM |
I knew I saw this somewhere ....
|
Edgy DC Feb 19 2006 12:55 PM |
So Inside Pitch agrees with BA on Milledge. They have Humber two slots higher, suggesting that BA --- not IP --- cares more for ability demonstrated as a pro. Having Bannister much higher also suggests that IP is more attentitive to results than to tools.
|
DocTee Feb 19 2006 02:32 PM |
Someone tell John Harper that a 25 pitch session does not a savior make.
|