Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Renaming the Nationals

Yancy Street Gang
Feb 22 2006 07:10 PM

I never liked the name "Nationals" so if it gets changed I won't be at all sorry. Maybe they can call themselves the "Devil Rays." That name is going to become available.

]Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Report: Nats name in middle of trademark dispute

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESPN.com news services

The team without a home or owner might also not have a name.

According to a report in The New York Times on Tuesday, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted a request for federal trademark registration on the name Washington Nationals to Bygone Sports last week. The Cincinnati-based company, which specializes in historic trademarks and sports apparel, applied for the trademark in September 2002.

According to the Times, Major League Baseball, aware of Bygone Sports' claim to the Washington Nationals name, thought it had reached an agreement with the company for the name's rights when the franchise was moved from Montreal in 2004.

"We believe we own the name and the rights," John McHale Jr., a baseball executive vice president, told the Times. "We struck a deal prior to the announcement with the people who claimed they owned the name, and we've been fighting to get that agreement enforced. They didn't live up to the agreement."

However, Roger Kaplan, an attorney for Bygone Sports, told the Times that although baseball contends an oral agreement was reached Nov. 12, 2004 -- 10 days before the team was renamed -- the sides had actually only reached a preliminary agreement.

"All the terms and conditions had not been fully discussed," he said.

Kaplan also contends that baseball and Bygone Sports had not put the agreement in writing and had agreed not to be bound by an agreement until it was in writing.

Both baseball and Bygone Sports sued, and the case landed in federal court, where it will be determined if there is an enforceable agreement. If the lawsuit goes forward, a trial is scheduled to begin April 3 -- the day the Nationals open their second season in Washington.

Neither baseball nor Bygone Sports dispute that the company raised its asking price for the rights from $130,000 to $1.5 million. Bygone Sports also asked for four tickets to the Nationals' opener last season and a $10,000 advertising credit on MLB.com.

"For two weeks after the team was named, Bygone was prepared to move forward on the original amount," Kaplan told the Times.

But negotiations collapsed, and both sides filed suit.

Baseball sued in June, claiming that although Bygone Sports had applied for the rights two years prior to the team's move, the company wanted to "turn a quick, undeserved profit" by seeking trademark registration rights. In its countersuit in July, Bygone Sports accused baseball of not researching the name to know that someone else had claimed it.

If the case proceeds and the judge rules for Bygone Sports, baseball would then have to decide whether to rename the team, because it would not be able to sell apparel and other paraphernalia with the Nationals name on it.

"You wouldn't be able to go to the ballpark and buy a shirt or cap with the team name on it," Kaplan told the Times.

"I think it's likely that we would change if we're not correct," McHale told the Times.

Zvon
Feb 22 2006 09:23 PM
Re: Renaming the Nationals

Yancy Street Gang wrote:

.....the company raised its asking price for the rights from $130,000 to $1.5 million. Bygone Sports also asked for four tickets to the Nationals' opener last season and a $10,000 advertising credit on MLB.com.


This is rape. They're enterprising crooks.
This is like when that guy tried to sell his snatched up domain name to the Pope.

Edgy DC
Feb 22 2006 10:28 PM

Well, it's not rape, but more like a shakedown. It's not, in itself, going to lead to a name change.

TheOldMole
Feb 23 2006 09:12 AM

I liked the name used by the entry in the National Chess League, founded during the Nixon era -- the Washington Plumbers.

New York's entry was the New York Threats.

silverdsl
Feb 23 2006 09:13 AM

I just find it amusing that after MLB went after all sorts of fan websites a few years ago for copywright and trademark infringements that someone else is going after them.

RealityChuck
Feb 23 2006 10:47 AM

silverdsl wrote:
I just find it amusing that after MLB went after all sorts of fan websites a few years ago for copywright and trademark infringements that someone else is going after them.

Why is that amusing?

They are required by law to enforce their trademarks, and to send notification if anyone uses them without permission.