Master Index of Archived Threads
Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?)
Benjamin Grimm Mar 04 2016 06:04 PM |
|
Yes, Schaefer will continue, but it will be different. I have come up with a new method of voting that will take up a lot less of my time, but may as a result cause a further decline in participation. That's a tradeoff that I'm willing to make. This will be a one-year experiment. The level of participation will determine whether we'll see more Schaefer in 2017. Either way, I plan to vote for every game in 2016, even if it turns out that I'm the only one doing so. Here are the differences: [list] There will no longer be the individual POTG threads in the forum. Voting will instead occur at http://potg.ultimatemets.com. It is currently possible for you to vote for games from the 1964 season. This will allow you, if you're interested, to see how voting will work. These games won't ever be tallied, so you can feel free to enter whatever numbers you want. Don't worry too much about examining old box scores from over fifty years ago! The online form will enforce the rules (no more than 6 points per player, no more than 10 points per game). Since all of the voting will be stored in UMDB database tables, the magic Schaefer spreadsheet that I've been using since 2005 has been retired. Custody of the spreadsheet is still in dispute. The Smithsonian has requested it as part of their collection, but the Swedish government is trying to stake a claim. We hope that this will be resolved amicably. I should, therefore, no longer have to fix spelling errors, or prorate votes that total over 10 points. It will also no longer be possible to vote for players who did not participate in the game for which the votes are being cast. Voting will have to wait until box score data has been pasted into the UMDB. That means that the practice of opening a POTG thread shortly after the game will no longer occur. Instead, I will post an update in the game's IGT to let you know that the game is ready for Schaefer voting. Typically, this will be the following morning, but it could be a few days, or even weeks, later, depending on my availability. (I'll be away for almost three weeks this summer, and while I'm overseas I don't expect that I'll be keeping up with box scores.) If you like voting right after the game, I suggest you log your votes somewhere, either electronically in your favorite app, or on a piece of paper, or in Magic Marker on your elbow. You can then enter your votes later, when the game becomes available. I expect that games will be open for at least two weeks, as opposed to the two business days that had previously been the norm. This means that we won't know the Players of the Month for April until some time in mid-May. In the past I used to make announcements like "voting for Tuesday's win over the Marlins will close on Friday morning, some time after 10 a.m." Now, instead, I may say something like, "voting for all games between April 3 and April 20 will close on the morning of May 5, some time after 10 a.m." [/list:u] And here's what remains the same: [list]The rules are the same. Points will still be awarded just as Lindsey, Ralph, and Bob used to do it. There will still be the six Player of the Month threads, which should look pretty much the same as you're used to. I'll still post the results for each individual game, either in this thread or in the individual IGT threads. (Final determination has not yet been made.)[/list:u]
|
themetfairy Mar 04 2016 06:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
This sounds like a worthy experiment. I'll be there voting with you.
|
d'Kong76 Mar 04 2016 06:54 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Cool, thanks! Took a test ride in the first win of the season.
|
Edgy MD Mar 04 2016 09:09 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
You can post to social media whenever a nu game is up for votes.
|
themetfairy Mar 04 2016 09:11 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I have two questions -
|
d'Kong76 Mar 04 2016 09:25 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Uh, and here!
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 04 2016 09:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
I guess I could. I still have yet to tweet, but there is the UMDB Facebook page.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 04 2016 09:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
1. That's a good idea. Right now I'm just listing it in box score order, but I guess I can maybe do a separate section for pitchers. Or maybe just a different background color so it's easier to spot. Don't know if I'll get to it before Opening Day, but I'll keep it on my mental to-do list. 2. Maybe I can do that as well. It would have to be on the same line item, though, because if the form had two lines for each pitcher that would make the validation more complicated.
|
themetfairy Mar 04 2016 11:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
Great - thanks!
|
seawolf17 Mar 07 2016 03:47 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Excellent!
|
Vic Sage Mar 07 2016 03:59 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
i'm in
|
Nymr83 Mar 07 2016 04:32 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I don't know that i'll vote, but I welcome the forum not being flooded with POTG threads, a voting link in the IGT would be more than sufficient
|
Edgy MD Mar 07 2016 05:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Is it possible to display the scorecard next to ballot, to allow the voter to view the players' performances in context?
|
Fman99 Mar 07 2016 05:10 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Pretty slick. I am resolving to vote more this year.
|
cooby classic Mar 07 2016 05:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
I thought I was the only one that felt that way
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 07 2016 06:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Unfortunately, no. Scorecards don't come about until after the season, when Retrosheet posts its play-by-play data. (Which reminds me that I still haven't processed the scorecard data for 2015.) I don't expect that the brief line of stats included on the voting form would really be sufficient for determining how to allocate points. It would probably make sense to refer to an online box score instead.
|
Nymr83 Mar 07 2016 07:35 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
perhaps we are the silent majority!
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 07 2016 08:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Well, let me apologize for continually annoying you for the last eleven years!
|
themetfairy Mar 07 2016 08:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
That would work!
|
cooby classic Mar 07 2016 08:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Oh now Ben Grimm you haven't annoyed us!
|
Ceetar Mar 07 2016 08:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
I think it's more when you go through them updating, or someone goes through them voting, and suddenly 7/8 of the top posts are voting threads.
|
cooby classic Mar 07 2016 08:18 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Yes that's it. I don't mind the threads at all.
|
d'Kong76 Mar 08 2016 01:28 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Thing #53 I do that's annoying and boring, vote on five Schaefer
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 03 2016 04:46 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'm going to watch tonight's game on TiVo-delay tomorrow morning, so the first box score of the season won't be posted to the UMDB until late morning at the earliest.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 04 2016 06:28 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
[youtube:1tmmbei8]cAQPKz7ki8E[/youtube:1tmmbei8]
|
Zvon Apr 04 2016 06:51 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I think I did it right. I got a green page after submission.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 04 2016 07:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
Green is good! Your vote has been registered.
That's a good idea. I'm not sure if I'll get to that any time soon, but I'll keep it in mind.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 04 2016 07:27 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Pretty slick! Thanks for building it.
|
Ashie62 Apr 04 2016 09:44 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Voted.....it is all that and a bag of chips!
|
Fman99 Apr 04 2016 10:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Super easy. I predict it will allow me to vote more often. Thanks BG
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2016 12:12 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
You're welcome! I was figuring that this would reduce participation but if it does the opposite all the better!
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2016 02:42 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Will voting remain open, and therefore the player of the game for a particular game possibly change over time as critical consensus evolves?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2016 11:23 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Games will remain open for voting longer than they did in past years, when it was two business days. Now, I'm figuring about two weeks, though we'll have to see how things develop. My current plan is to close out games from the first half of April on or around May 1, and the second half of April on or around May 15, etc.
|
cooby classic Apr 05 2016 11:27 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I was thinking, couldn't you add another true to the Baseball Fora for POTG? Then it would still be here and handy
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2016 11:29 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
"Add another true?"
|
cooby classic Apr 05 2016 11:38 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Stupid auto correct (sigh)
|
Fman99 Apr 05 2016 12:27 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
It's all right there, now, I don't have to start a new thread, or find a box score, as the stats are all there. Just plug in my votes and submit. Seems way easier to me. As long as the link gets posted to the IGT after each game I hope to vote on as many games as possible this year.
|
metsmarathon Apr 05 2016 12:44 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
the biggest problem for me was always that once i fell behind, i felt like i could never catch up. leaving hte games open for 2 weeks will help me a lot.
|
Fman99 Apr 06 2016 03:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Seconded as a "would be useful" request.
|
Edgy MD Apr 06 2016 03:44 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
No, I was thinking that, as more users visit the UMDB, one might decide to vote on a game he saw five years ago, and lo and behold, the results continue to evolve.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 06 2016 08:26 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
Okay, I found an easy way to do this. When you vote on Friday's game, check out the new "Check My Math" button that's to the left of the "Submit" button.
|
themetfairy Apr 06 2016 09:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I have another request. For relief pitchers, would it be possible to include inherited runners stranded/inherited runners allowed as a stat?
|
Zvon Apr 06 2016 10:26 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||||
That's exactly what I needed. Thank you. You have no idea how much paper you've saved me over the course of the season. I think you just saved an entire forest.
TMF has a point- there are some grey areas in a game where a full box score might shed a light on something that might not be reflected in your game breakdowns. For me, I don't think that's needed for games I watch. Games I don't watch I will still consult a full box from CBS or ESPN on my own. I don't know if a link to a full box is necessary but there are times I will need to go over one. No real biggy, as I said I can zip over to CBSsportsline myself. I agree with TMF that the more info included in your game breakdowns, the better.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 07 2016 12:30 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Apr 07 2016 03:25 AM |
Geez folks, there about 87 different ways to call up a box score on the interwebs, ones that come complete with pictures, descriptions, and accounts of the game.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 07 2016 12:50 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Yes. Those abbreviated stats on the voting form are just there as a handy reminder. They're not intended to replace an actual box score. I'm afraid that what you're currently seeing is as good as it will get.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 07 2016 01:33 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
It's great, I predict many of us will vote for all 162 games for the first time this season.
C'mon bro... 0.50+3.50+1.00+1.50+0.50+1.00+0.50+1.50=??.?? throws you a curve ball? 0.75's!! oh, horrors.... :-)))
|
Fman99 Apr 08 2016 02:10 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|||
Awesome, thanks man!
|
Mets Willets Point Apr 08 2016 05:39 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Oh, this is fun. So much easier. I think I'll be participating more often.
|
Zvon Apr 08 2016 06:22 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
||
lol. Truthfully, years ago when I first started voting I had problems, mostly keeping it under 10. And I'd agonize over giving everyone who deserved it just the right amount of beer. But after doing it for years, now it's like bing-bang-boom-DUN. Still, that "check the math" thing will come in handy.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 09 2016 03:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Just busting bajangas. In a 'busy' win I find I usually end up giving too
|
Frayed Knot Apr 10 2016 04:55 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
So Grimm, are visitors to UMDB being offered (encouraged?) the opportunity to vote on these games or is PotG remaining essentially a secret project for us CPF elitists?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 10 2016 06:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
So far I guess it's still "secret". I may some day do something to promote it but have not yet done so. Zvon said something about posting a link on his blog. I have no objections to anything like that. I do see some unfamiliar aliases among the voters but my assumption is that it's one of us being playful.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 10 2016 11:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
It just seems that, since you accept reader comments on games, that accepting votes on PotG would be would be a natural.
|
A Boy Named Seo Apr 11 2016 03:25 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
i'm late to the party, but this is great stuff, BG. Much easier mechanism to do the thing.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 14 2016 06:49 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
So far this season 23 of the 25 Mets who have played have received Schaefer points. The only two exceptions are Steven Matz and Eric Campbell.
|
themetfairy Apr 14 2016 07:06 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Hi - me again to annoy you further....
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 14 2016 07:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Not a bad idea, but it's not something I'm going to get to any time soon. It sounds like it should be an easy thing to do, but it would probably take me a while to find the spot where I'd have to make the change.
|
Edgy MD Apr 14 2016 07:16 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'll work on that one.
|
themetfairy Apr 14 2016 07:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Great - thanks!
|
themetfairy Apr 16 2016 02:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'm loving the Check My Math feature!
|
d'Kong76 Apr 16 2016 02:40 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I have to admit, after goofin' on Z about it, I love it and use it too.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2016 02:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Two-week warning: All games played through yesterday, April 17, will be closing in two weeks, on or about May 2. I'll post another reminder as the day draws closer. If you've been taking advantage of the longer window for voting and have some catching up to do, please be sure to do so in the next couple of weeks.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2016 02:38 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Voters who have voted in five or more games:
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 18 2016 02:40 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
"Johnny" has also voted under several other handles and I think is 11-for-11 this year.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2016 02:57 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
If you want me to update the name on your earlier votes I can do that. (Just let me know which names you used on which games.) Because all this stuff is stored in a database now I'll be able to post end-of-season totals for each individual.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 18 2016 02:58 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Please don;t do any extra work on my account!
|
themetfairy Apr 18 2016 03:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Crunchwraps may be a disincentive for voting ;)
|
TransMonk Apr 18 2016 03:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'm trying to get my Schaefer groove back on for 2016 after not participating for a couple of years. I'm still looking to only vote in games I see with my eyeballs (which is hopefully mostly all of them).
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2016 03:51 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Glad to hear it! I actually thought the new method would discourage participation, because of the delay between when the game ends and when you can vote, and because there are no longer Schaefer threads floating around the forum to server as reminders. But so far that hasn't at all proven to be the case.
|
Ashie62 Apr 19 2016 12:57 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
More than double last year. Great work Grimm.
|
metsmarathon Apr 19 2016 05:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'm trying to update my spreadsheet to more automatically cull data from the box scores, and working out the kinks is taking a bit more time than I would like. but it's getting there, and should allow me to start participating more shortly.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 21 2016 06:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I doled out 9 points in last night's (04/20) loss. I think that's the most
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 22 2016 10:32 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
So far, this experiment seems to be working.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 26 2016 12:42 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Centerfield Apr 26 2016 01:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Yup.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 28 2016 02:15 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
The reason that the voting form asks for your name is so that you don't vote twice. So please, don't vote twice for the same game!
|
Zvon Apr 28 2016 02:28 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Did I just do that? I was more behind than I thought, need to catch up.
|
Zvon Apr 28 2016 02:30 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Oh yea, what a mess. Whoops.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 28 2016 12:06 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
It's okay. I was able to fix it, but please be sure to check that you haven't already voted before voting again. Thanks!
|
Edgy MD Apr 28 2016 12:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Someday, the UMDB will be a registration site, and we'll have to log in to vote Schaeffer or leave our dumb memories. But courageous Ben is working overtime to make sure that day isn't upon us just yet, doing all the policing and cleaning up that robots do at registration sites.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 28 2016 12:27 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Not entirely, I'm afraid. Keep an eye out for one of the future Schaefer announcement graphics.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 29 2016 01:16 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
protection for humans from robots is not needed. robots have only the best of plans for humankind.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2016 01:32 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
The Schaefer Player of the Month award for April is being hotly contested. Your votes could definitely sway the results in this critical battle. Be sure to get caught up when you get the chance! All games played through April 17 will be closing on Tuesday morning, but the games from the second half of April will remain open for voting until the middle of May.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 03 2016 12:11 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 03 2016 12:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm May 08 2016 01:01 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 13 2016 02:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Last call for all remaining games from April. Each game will be closed to further voting on Sunday morning. We'll also have the announcement for the April Players of the Month.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 15 2016 11:15 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 15 2016 11:15 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm May 18 2016 02:34 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Here's a list of people who have voted in five or more games, through Sunday's final game in Denver.
|
d'Kong76 May 18 2016 02:43 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I imagine Cameo Voter du jour is close to 37 for 37? I just want to
|
Benjamin Grimm May 18 2016 07:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Well, I didn't have 162 "THIS GAME IS NOW AVAILABLE FOR SCHAEFER VOTING" banners prepared. You may (or may not) have noticed that they've started to repeat.
|
themetfairy May 19 2016 12:54 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Immediate regret - I awarded Hansel Robles 2 points for the May 18th game, when I really wish to award him 1.25 points.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 19 2016 12:58 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I fixed it for you.
|
themetfairy May 19 2016 01:11 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Thanks BG!
|
Benjamin Grimm May 23 2016 12:33 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 24 2016 02:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Another reminder... please don't vote twice for the same game! If you see your name listed in the voting results, that means you've already voted!
|
Benjamin Grimm May 27 2016 03:28 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Final reminder: If you're interested in voting for any games played during the first 15 days of May, please be sure to do so before Monday morning.
|
themetfairy Jun 01 2016 03:46 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Where are you BG? I have a serious case of voting withdrawal!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 02 2016 05:36 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Sorry! I've been dealing with a family health issue for over a week and the Mets, the CPF, the UMDB, Schaefer, my job, and virtually everything else has been put on the back burner. The nightmare seems to be coming to a happy conclusion soon, so I expect to get caught up by early next week. We do apologize for any inconvenience!
|
d'Kong76 Jun 02 2016 07:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Glad to hear things have turned the corner for the better!
|
Ashie62 Jun 03 2016 12:10 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Be well ***
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 03 2016 12:29 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Thank you!
|
themetfairy Jun 03 2016 01:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
So sorry BG - wishing you all the best!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 04 2016 02:46 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Ashie62 Jun 04 2016 09:32 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Good to see you.
|
G-Fafif Jun 05 2016 09:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Apologies to Michael Conforto, whose significant contribution to Saturday's victory I vapor-locked on while filling out the ballot (I was sharper on these things when we did them right after the game, though I'm glad the current format seems to attract more voters). Now I know how that writer who plum forgot to check Seaver's name in late 1991 felt.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 08 2016 08:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Through 57 games, our most frequent voters:
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 08 2016 08:47 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2016 03:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Voting for all remaining open games from the month of May will close on the morning of Friday, June 17, some time after 7 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 17 2016 01:35 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 24 2016 01:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 30 2016 02:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Last call for all games played in the first half of June.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 01 2016 01:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 01 2016 01:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
G-Fafif Jul 04 2016 02:10 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Judging from July 3, pinch-hitter Jacob deGrom, who did not pitch, has confounded the ballot format.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 04 2016 02:43 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Oops!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 07 2016 12:52 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Ashie62 Jul 10 2016 04:25 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Just a bump.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 15 2016 12:48 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 15 2016 12:49 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
themetfairy Jul 15 2016 01:26 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
BG - what is the time frame when you're going to be away and we're going to have delays on the voting?
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 15 2016 01:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
We actually had to cancel our big summer vacation plans because of family health issues -- we were going to leave for Australia tomorrow -- but that's off. We may take a more modest trip over the next few weeks, or we may not go anywhere at all.
|
themetfairy Jul 15 2016 02:56 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I'm so sorry to hear that BG :(
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 19 2016 03:34 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Most frequent voters, through 92 games:
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 22 2016 01:28 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
We're going to leave tomorrow on a roughly two-week jaunt. I can't promise that I'll paste any box scores into the UMDB during that time; I almost certainly won't be doing it every morning, so there will be a Schaefer disruption. We expect to return around August 5.
|
themetfairy Jul 22 2016 06:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Safe travels BG!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 22 2016 06:42 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Thank you!
|
Ashie62 Jul 28 2016 10:02 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Hi Ben!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 28 2016 10:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Shhhhh! I'm lurking!
|
themetfairy Aug 05 2016 03:58 AM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I miss BG....
|
Ashie62 Aug 07 2016 09:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
We're back. yea!
|
d'Kong76 Aug 07 2016 09:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I caught up some yesterday, have to do a whole 'nother chunk in the morning.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 08 2016 08:01 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 10 2016 07:22 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I like that, with this new system, I don't have to remind everyone that votes for Rene Rivera now have to be RRivera and that we don't have to wonder whether T.J. Rivera is TRivera or TJRivera.
|
G-Fafif Aug 10 2016 07:23 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
If we could just get Bombo out of retirement, we could give Pittsburgh a battle with our Three Riveras lineup.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2016 02:03 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2016 02:06 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 15 2016 02:24 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
d'Kong76 Aug 15 2016 02:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
In less that 24 hours I caught up and knocked out half-a-month. Catching up is
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 22 2016 02:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 22 2016 02:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 22 2016 02:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
d'Kong76 Aug 22 2016 03:50 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Catching up this morning... I have to ask, Ben - on 8/16 T J went 4-4, 2 R and
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 22 2016 05:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
I guess it was an oversight! I'll adjust my vote -- because I can!
|
d'Kong76 Aug 22 2016 05:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
"I can re-vote it, I have the technology" - Six Million Dollar Admin
|
Ashie62 Aug 28 2016 11:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Bumper
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 29 2016 02:11 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 29 2016 02:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 08 2016 01:21 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 14 2016 03:31 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Final reminder that today is the last day to vote for any remaining games from the month of August.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 15 2016 01:06 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 22 2016 01:04 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 27 2016 09:30 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Last call for games from the first half of September. If you still have games that you intend to vote for, please do so tonight or tomorrow.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 29 2016 01:05 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 04 2016 06:22 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Voting for all remaining games from the 2016 regular season will close next Tuesday, October 11, some time after 7 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 11 2016 03:35 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
Player of the Year will be announced on Thursday.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 11 2016 03:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2016: New! Different! (Better?) |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK, 2016
|