Master Index of Archived Threads
Conforto up, Nimmo down
Lefty Specialist Jul 18 2016 12:07 AM |
Cespedes wants to play LF from now on. So looks like Lagares will get a lot of playing time (Please Terry, No De Aza). Conforto can only play right in this scenario. There's no real way to platoon Conforto with Granderson, so what's a manager to do?
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Jul 18 2016 12:13 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
Does Curtis have any trade value as we approach the deadline?
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 18 2016 01:13 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down Edited 3 time(s), most recently on Jul 18 2016 01:27 AM |
|
Cespedes-Granderson-Conforto would be the Mets best hitting outfield. Granderson has, obviously, played little CF. Lagares could be platooned, worked in against lefties in thar rotation, with Grandy and Conforto absorbing most of the bench-time when Lag plays. Platooning your best hitting outfielders is not the most ideal set-up, however, especially when hitting is clearly the Mets achilles heel. In fact, extending that analogy, the Mets are hitting as if both of their achilles heels are damaged. OTOH, Conforto regaining his pre-malaise stroke would go a very long way towards fixing the Mets hitting woes. His slump was a significant contributor to the team's hitting problems. Granderson could be traded, but like Mich asks, how much trade value is there? He's 35 and will be owed $16M next year, the last year of his contract. He has value to a team that sees itself in the race this year and thinks it needs an outfielder, but Granderson, alone, won't bring in a marquee name or some young one with a high ceiling. Conforto could bring that guy in. Despite his Sophomore slump, Conforto's still highly coveted by many teams. It would be somewhat of a shocker if the Mets moved Conforto, and an extremely aggressive move, probably indicating that the Mets think they can still catch the Nats -- extremely aggressive especially since it's not guaranteed that Cespedes will be a Met next season.
|
Nymr83 Jul 18 2016 01:19 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
|
you want to trade away our 2nd best hitter? Conforto just doesnt fit as an every day player right now because Lagares is hitting enough again this year that his CF defense makes him worth playing ahead of Conforto anyway. that Nimmo and Conforto both bat lefty is a problem, since neither is a good platoon partner for Granderson
|
Zvon Jul 18 2016 01:30 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
I wish Cespedes would play right. Someone has to convince him that he can't say he has the best arm in the game if he don't show us some rightfield to 3rd laser beams. That still wouldn't solve this problem though.
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Jul 18 2016 01:53 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
I'd rather not trade Conforto or Nimmo. I think they're the future -- especially if Cespedes departs.
|
d'Kong76 Jul 18 2016 01:54 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
Someone will be gone in the next couple of weeks. It would really suck to
|
Zvon Jul 18 2016 02:02 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
What about Wheeler? Is he untouchable?
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 18 2016 02:35 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
It's hard to argue that Wilmer Flores is hot if he's barely played for almost two weeks.
|
Edgy MD Jul 18 2016 02:44 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
I'd be hesitant to make too much of Céspedes' comments.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 18 2016 03:18 AM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
Nobody ever wants to trade the guy who's going well, or looks good. But, y'know, that's who you trade.
|
Ashie62 Jul 18 2016 12:37 PM Re: Conforto up, Nimmo down |
Nimmo has shown little at this point but lets hang on to him and Conforto..
|