Master Index of Archived Threads
Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig
1962 | 12 votes |
1990 Original Edition | 4 votes |
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2018 06:39 AM |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2018 06:42 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
This is the first poll of our second round, in which our Sweet Sixteen will be determined.
|
41Forever May 01 2018 07:01 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
As much as I love the lettering on that 1962 cover, the baby makes the Creepy Sun Baby look cuddly.
|
A Boy Named Seo May 01 2018 09:18 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
I was gonna comment that 62 was gonna be tough to beat, but we got a match here!
|
d'Kong76 May 01 2018 09:28 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
Went with spikes and diapers.
|
Edgy MD May 01 2018 09:34 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
Spikes and Diapers, coming this fall on TLC.
|
G-Fafif May 01 2018 11:44 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
Birth dates of those pictured in this round:
|
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2018 11:50 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
|
That extra half game in the standings always seemed particularly gratuitous to me. Baby Met romped to a 21-0 victory in the first round, but is facing a little bit of opposition this time.
|
G-Fafif May 01 2018 11:59 AM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
|||
The half-game was a function of the three-game pennant playoff between the Dodgers and Giants, those entities whose departure from New York made the Mets necessary. The 1962 Mets ceased to exist and kept losing ground.
The Post speculates the "SUPERBABY" hype is getting to 1962, especially since it was seen stumbling around at the Polo Grounds opening.
|
RealityChuck May 04 2018 02:24 PM Re: Yearbook Cover Derby Round 2.01 1962 vs 1990 orig |
1990 is objectively the better cover, but you have to give points for 1962 for being the first.
|