Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


The Florry Story

Edgy MD
Jul 12 2018 03:08 PM

Homegrown, appealing, with a long résumé full of big moments, and possibly (probably?) the Mets' best hitter right now, Wilmer Flores has done everything you could hope for, short of securing a position for himself. But that's a big step he has continually failed to make, and one he has perhaps two remaining weeks to accomplish, as much or most speculation suggests he's about the most tradable commodity the Mets have.

[fimg=400:2w3wln08]https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/7d34aed3ff930d9492833c40f0bca57f1d516ba5/c=0-0-731-975/local/-/media/2018/07/09/Bergen/NorthJersey/636667698245226647-bx101-362c-9.jpg?width=534&height=712&fit=crop[/fimg:2w3wln08]

seawolf17
Jul 12 2018 03:22 PM
Re: The Florry Story

If he gets dealt, he turns into Justin Turner II. LET HIM PLAY.

Centerfield
Jul 12 2018 03:54 PM
Re: The Florry Story

What would we get for him? A decent young player under team control?

Isn't that what he already is?

Edgy MD
Jul 12 2018 03:57 PM
Re: The Florry Story

He's arbitration eligible going into 2019 and a free agent after that. I think the idea would presumably be that they would get younger and more controllable talent.

The Dodgers are desperate at second base and may be a landing spot for him or Cabrera.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 12 2018 04:05 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I envision a Flores-and-Wheeler package. I don't know what it would yield, but it should be something pretty good.

metirish
Jul 12 2018 04:56 PM
Re: The Florry Story

There are very few reasons to watch the Mets right now, Flores is one yet he can't hold down a starting job.

41Forever
Jul 12 2018 04:57 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I envision a Flores-and-Wheeler package. I don't know what it would yield, but it should be something pretty good.


Isn't that the package that we nearly sent to the Brewers for Carols Gomez?

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 12 2018 04:58 PM
Re: The Florry Story

That's right! I had forgotten about that!

smg58
Jul 12 2018 05:17 PM
Re: The Florry Story

If you think the Mets’ need for a rightanded first baseman will be less next year, and if you think that Rivera and/or Cecchini can do what Flores can do in the rest of the infield, then he’s expendable. He’s one of my favorite Mets and you wouldn’t simply take whatever you could get, but you listen to offers.

41Forever
Jul 12 2018 05:18 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
That's right! I had forgotten about that!



I think that's the classic example of a deal I'm glad we didn't make!

metirish
Jul 12 2018 05:28 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I think there is also the notion that we love Flores because we have been though so much with him, he loves the Mets etc , we feel that connection, but he's bang average and really what would you get for him? Bang average in return that's what

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 12 2018 05:29 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I could go for an average bang.

Edgy MD
Jul 12 2018 05:37 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Well, a big part of why trades are made is because two teams have different assessments of some players' value. And sometimes, one of those teams is more right than the other.

Otherwise, why give up good players, mediocre players, or bad players, if you're just going to get the same in return?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jul 12 2018 05:44 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I like Flores quite a bit. I think he likes me.

If some guy likes him a lot more than me, then we have to listen.

The guy who'd be great to trade is Matz. I'm not that into him, and I don;t think he likes me. But any contendah would be thrilled to get their mitts on a lefty like him. Maybe they won't appreciate how remarkably unreliable he's really been till just now, and if history tells you anything, will become again.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 12 2018 05:54 PM
Re: The Florry Story

A Matz-Flores package could also work. Matz, as you say, has been inconsistent, but his advantage over Wheeler is that he has more years of control. (Three more, I think.)

Ceetar
Jul 12 2018 06:08 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I'd rather not trade our pitchers unless it's in a package for something really awesome. I don't want to shuffle Matz or Wheeler away for like a Todd Frazier "pretty decently above average but not remarkable". Then you need to find another starter of that quality and you're better off just finding that hitter.

I don't think Flores, the bad defender who can occasionally get hot but is mostly average. I'm sure he'll have value as the righty platoon guy for some contenders, but not hugely valuable. There's a lot of 'homegrown' value to him that no one else will care about. And with only one, expensive, year left you're not gonna ship him off to someone like Milwaukee who might view him as a nice stand-in at a variety of positions while you're rebuilding.

This is where the Mets are going to miss having a GM though. Flores probably will be on the team as a reserve next year, but at $5 million or so you might be better off with the TJ Rivera/AAAA type guy there for free. If so, you have to trade him for basically anything, live arm, whatever, but that GM is probably not on the team right now to make that decision.

seawolf17
Jul 12 2018 06:11 PM
Re: The Florry Story

The problem with trading any of our four starters is that they're almost *exactly* what we *want* back. I'd rather ride with the horses we've got. Now, if this was a contending situation and Matz, Flores, and a prospect would get us Justin Verlander, then hey, go for it. But good young pitchers with team control are what we need, no? I don't get it.

And Flores is what Flores is, but there does come a point where I kind of like rooting for the guys I like. And I like Wilmer a lot and I'd like to continue rooting for him.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jul 12 2018 06:15 PM
Re: The Florry Story

How about if Matz gets us next year's (or the year after's) catcher and/or second baseman? Some kid who can hit? That's what a team 15 games out needs to trade for. I'm as optimistic on the volume of pitchers the Mets have (Gzelly, Lugo, Dunn, Peterson etc) as I am suspicious of Matz as a longterm guy given his fragility. It's almost like a gift that he's done so well.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 12 2018 06:19 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Speaking of next year's second baseman, they should be using the rest of the season to find out if that might be Jeff McNeil. (And I suspect that they'll be doing that in August and September. At least I hope so.)

I think I'd like a talented young outfielder to come back in a trade. Put Cespedes at first (maybe???) and ditch Bruce (any way you can). Have an outfield of Conforto, Nimmo, the new guy, and Lagares?

Ceetar
Jul 12 2018 06:25 PM
Re: The Florry Story

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
How about if Matz gets us next year's (or the year after's) catcher and/or second baseman? Some kid who can hit? That's what a team 15 games out needs to trade for. I'm as optimistic on the volume of pitchers the Mets have (Gzelly, Lugo, Dunn, Peterson etc) as I am suspicious of Matz as a longterm guy given his fragility. It's almost like a gift that he's done so well.


I mean, yeah, I guess. I like having the lefty, but if you're convinced he's fragile (well, that he's significantly more fragile than roughly every other pitcher who you might replace him with) try to swing a trade for some equal-ish value as a more stable hitter. I personally err on the side of 'keep the pitcher', but I maybe biased as both his and my daughter's first games were the same day.

Edgy MD
Jul 12 2018 06:41 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Speaking of next year's second baseman, they should be using the rest of the season to find out if that might be Jeff McNeil.

My money is on Mac coming up for the first game after the All-Star Break.

smg58
Jul 12 2018 09:46 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I think it depends on when Cabrera is traded. After all the bad breaks we've gotten over the past three seasons, I keep hoping that McNeil turns out to be the good break that turns the team around.

cooby
Jul 12 2018 10:54 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I want Wilmer here forever. I adore the guy in a motherly sort of way

MFS62
Jul 13 2018 12:07 AM
Re: The Florry Story

cooby wrote:
I want Wilmer here forever. I adore the guy in a motherly sort of way

As I love him in a fatherly way.

Later

MFS62
Jul 13 2018 12:16 AM
Re: The Florry Story

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Put Cespedes at first (maybe???)

I know there was an article in the NY Post (today) which talked about a Cespeded move to playing first. But with his leg and hamstring problems, I think the first time he has to stretch for a throw, it would be the last.

Later

cooby
Jul 13 2018 01:11 AM
Re: The Florry Story

Cespedes can jump off a pier as far as I’m concerned

Though as a motherly figure, I hope he can Swim

d'Kong76
Jul 13 2018 01:19 AM
Re: The Florry Story

We're married to the man through 2020 for muchas dolares. Might as
well root for him to get better, find a place for him to stand in the field
and to stay off of piers until trading deadline 2020.

seawolf17
Jul 13 2018 06:10 AM
Re: The Florry Story

d'Kong76 wrote:
We're married to the man through 2020 for muchas dolares. Might as
well root for him to get better, find a place for him to stand in the field
and to stay off of piers until trading deadline 2020.

Yup. Gotta cross our fingers that he can be the lineup centerpiece he's supposed to be.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2018 01:38 PM
Re: The Florry Story

d'Kong76 wrote:
We're married to the man through 2020 for muchas dolares. Might as
well root for him to get better, find a place for him to stand in the field
and to stay off of piers until trading deadline 2020.


I don't think he'd be a good 1B and I'd rather him be Jeff Francoeur in the OF defensively over playing at first. Don't waste that arm.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 13 2018 01:53 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I agree about the arm, but first base would put less wear and tear on his legs. I'll have to trust the Mets to make the right decision. (Good grief.)

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 02:06 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Cespedes can jump off a pier as far as I’m concerned

Though as a motherly figure, I hope he can Swim


I don't get this at all. The guy is hurt. We can be upset that he's hurt but I don't see why we would be upset at him.

Plus this is Beltran all over again. The guy is hurt. Jeffy clearly thinks the injury is not as bad as he says it is. Tells his lieutenants to send a message through the media.

Mets GM Sandy Alderson talked to reporters on Thursday about the injury to Cespedes, “I’m a little surprised it has taken as long as it has. … I’m hopeful he’ll be ready to go in the not-too-distant future.”


You know what? Fuck you Sandy. The guy is hurt. He rushed back too early last year, and he ended up getting fucked. He rushed back this year, and went back on the shelf. So I'm thinking maybe we try listening to him and wait until he's healed.

I don't know who the new GM will be. But give me the guy who will tell ownership to go to hell and defend our guy:

"You know what? Fuck all you guys who think Cespedes is dogging it. The guy is hurt. He's working his ass off to get back. When will that be? When he's fucking recovered. Why would anyone think he's dogging it? He played out of position in 2015 for the good of the team. He played hurt throughout that postseason. He tried playing hurt last year and it blew up on him. He even tried rushing back this year and it set him back weeks. So maybe everyone chill the fuck out and let him and our medical staff tell us when he's ready to go."

bmfc1
Jul 13 2018 02:13 PM
Re: The Florry Story

CF is right. You're not getting any quotes from management about Jay Bruce's long recovery period. Sandy didn't help it by suggesting that Yoenis was dogging it.

smg58
Jul 13 2018 02:15 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I'm with you on this CF.

As for first base: our best prospect is a first baseman currently in AAA after ripping the leather off the ball in AA. That's a non-starter, or at least it should be.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2018 02:30 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I think the first base thing might just be a temporary "Let's get you back this year to play some games." thing. At least I hope. I'd actually worry more about the quick pivots and movements at first more than the outfield. Let him slowly lumber after balls out there if he needs.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 02:34 PM
Re: The Florry Story

A big part of my problem with Sandy is how much he was willing to spew the Wilpon rhetoric.

Mets GM Sandy Alderson talked to reporters on Thursday about the injury to Cespedes, “I’m a little surprised it has taken as long as it has. … I’m hopeful he’ll be ready to go in the not-too-distant future.”


Hey guys. Cespedes is dogging it. He's a fucking bum.

“Honestly, sometimes I think we’re a little too cautious, frankly, with how we approach injuries,” Alderson said.


These spoiled fucking athletes should get off their ass and start earning the money we're paying them.

Cespedes has a contract that pays him $29 million a season through 2020, and Alderson, in comments almost 10 days ago, seemed to question the wisdom of the Mets’ decision — actually, his decision — to sign him to a four-year, $110 million contract after the 2016 season.

“Some people are more susceptible to injuries than others,” Alderson said. “Maybe you could say, ‘Well, gee, susceptible to injury, shouldn’t that have entered into some decision in the past?’ And the answer to that would be yes, in all probability. That all gets taken into account.”


See what happens when you spend money? You get a lazy-ass dog who sits around collecting paychecks for nothing.

You're kidding yourself if you can't see the Wilpon coming out in those statements.

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 03:00 PM
Re: The Florry Story

So, from a communications perspective, it would benefit both Cespedes and the Mets for him to talk to the media. Change the narrative. Talk about the injury, what the problems are, why the recovery period is long and express that he's excited to get back and contribute. Wright has done this periodically. I'm stunned that they didn't do this with Cespedes in Miami. An answer-all-questions presser can do wonders when there is nothing to hide, which is what I'm sure is the situation here.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2018 03:06 PM
Re: The Florry Story

You don't think it's possible the old white marine might have similar takes?

The last one is confusing. I can't tell if we're criticizing the Wilpons for not spending on the team or for deciding who to spend on? I think that's just one of those nothing 'talk about process and say nothing' quotes from Alderson. Unless this is a jibe back at them. Are the Wilpons asking Sandy "Hey, is Cespedes ready to go yet or what?" and Sandy's like, "uh, maybe we shouldn't re-sign guys with this type of injury?"

The other two are annoying. Particularly the second one, though that's again part of the damn old-school "just rub some dirt on it and play!" stuff that could very well be Sandy's own beliefs as well.

41Forever wrote:
So, from a communications perspective, it would benefit both Cespedes and the Mets for him to talk to the media. Change the narrative. Talk about the injury, what the problems are, why the recovery period is long and express that he's excited to get back and contribute. Wright has done this periodically. I'm stunned that they didn't do this with Cespedes in Miami. An answer-all-questions presser can do wonders when there is nothing to hide, which is what I'm sure is the situation here.


You're bashing me constantly in not so subtle racist ways, let me open up to you and talk to you and give you quotes? nah, fuck that. I get that it's self-perpetuating in that the media bashes a guy and that guy takes it personally and then doesn't want to talk to them and then they get pissed he's not opening up to them and bash the guy and...

but let's put the pressure on the click-bait MetsBeat to gives us some real honest reporting and not "oh, guess they have to bash the guy since he won't talk".

Edgy MD
Jul 13 2018 03:10 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Are we on a new topic here? I think we are.

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 03:24 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Ceetar wrote:

41Forever wrote:
So, from a communications perspective, it would benefit both Cespedes and the Mets for him to talk to the media. Change the narrative. Talk about the injury, what the problems are, why the recovery period is long and express that he's excited to get back and contribute. Wright has done this periodically. I'm stunned that they didn't do this with Cespedes in Miami. An answer-all-questions presser can do wonders when there is nothing to hide, which is what I'm sure is the situation here.


You're bashing me constantly in not so subtle racist ways, let me open up to you and talk to you and give you quotes? nah, fuck that. I get that it's self-perpetuating in that the media bashes a guy and that guy takes it personally and then doesn't want to talk to them and then they get pissed he's not opening up to them and bash the guy and...

but let's put the pressure on the click-bait MetsBeat to gives us some real honest reporting and not "oh, guess they have to bash the guy since he won't talk".


Then you let other people control your narrative. MetsBeat is going to be writing about it no matter what, so you want to make sure it is your narrative they are advancing. The more you do to drive the message -- and can provide for the reporters -- the better off you are. Trust me on this, saying "F 'em" doesn't work. They could even pick one reporter they are comfortable with, let that person post the story and the others will follow.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 03:36 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I agree that Cespedes (and for his part, Beltran) could alleviate a lot by taking matters into their own hands and speaking directly to the press. But you are asking someone who is an athlete (not a correspondent), to speak to the press in his second language, after they have already seemingly made up their minds that they are against him, and with the full support of his employer. Just a bullshit situation to be in.

And although Cespedes could certainly help himself here, the big issue is that he's being put in that situation in the first place. Absolute classless, bullshit, dickless assholes running this organization. And if Sandy actually feels this (and isn't just giving the company line) then fuck him even more.

And I don't think the underlying message from those quotes could be any more clear. The Wilpons think he's a bum. They think that these athletes are babied too much as it is. And they felt public pressure to sign Cespedes, and now all he does is get hurt all the time. See, they were right all along.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2018 03:38 PM
Re: The Florry Story

41Forever wrote:


Then you let other people control your narrative. MetsBeat is going to be writing about it no matter what, so you want to make sure it is your narrative they are advancing. The more you do to drive the message -- and can provide for the reporters -- the better off you are. Trust me on this, saying "F 'em" doesn't work. They could even pick one reporter they are comfortable with, let that person post the story and the others will follow.


Meh, it's not on Cespedes to care about how the media portrays him. Even when he's healthy and fine the MetsBeat is all "why is he playing golf so much? Maybe he shouldn't buy such flashy cars?" It doesn't matter if someone ( Isabel Vincent and Melissa Klein ) does a very well written and researched piece on Yoenis in Cuba coming from nothing and how he's enjoying the freedom of America. It's literally a story of the so-called American Dream and they still bashed him being too flashy.

The media doesn't need to be all "I don't know why you make me do this to you Yoenis" about it.

d'Kong76
Jul 13 2018 03:42 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I don't know, when 41F gets on a roll he sounds like a polished professional purveyor
of promotional propoganda. It's a baseball team, not capitol hill or whatever here.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 13 2018 03:46 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I imagine that many of the same rules apply, though. He makes a good point that the Mets haven't been good at controlling their messaging. It's not something that I particularly care about, until and unless it has some kind of impact on the results on the field. But for their own sake, the Mets should try to get better at this kind of stuff.

Edgy MD
Jul 13 2018 03:50 PM
Re: The Florry Story

And/or player agents should put their players in the hands of publicists who help them on their personal message.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2018 03:53 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I imagine that many of the same rules apply, though. He makes a good point that the Mets haven't been good at controlling their messaging. It's not something that I particularly care about, until and unless it has some kind of impact on the results on the field. But for their own sake, the Mets should try to get better at this kind of stuff.


It's just that it's an impossible task. The Wilpons get criticized constantly for not talking until they talk and everyone remembers they're garbage people and then they want them to shut up again.

The Mets open up about injuries and then get killed when those injuries don't heal as fast as initially prognosticated. But if they're not clear on injuries they're hiding something.

They literally can't win. It's why I wish they'd lean into things sometimes, but the Wilpons are too old-fashioned/stick in the muds to do that. Like have a "doors open" night to mock the bullpen gate thing. "On September 10th, the Mets will 'accidentally leave all the doors open to all the Citi Field clubs'"

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 03:58 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jul 13 2018 03:58 PM

Centerfield wrote:
I agree that Cespedes (and for his part, Beltran) could alleviate a lot by taking matters into their own hands and speaking directly to the press. But you are asking someone who is an athlete (not a correspondent), to speak to the press in his second language, after they have already seemingly made up their minds that they are against him, and with the full support of his employer. Just a bullshit situation to be in.

And although Cespedes could certainly help himself here, the big issue is that he's being put in that situation in the first place. Absolute classless, bullshit, dickless assholes running this organization. And if Sandy actually feels this (and isn't just giving the company line) then fuck him even more.

And I don't think the underlying message from those quotes could be any more clear. The Wilpons think he's a bum. They think that these athletes are babied too much as it is. And they felt public pressure to sign Cespedes, and now all he does is get hurt all the time. See, they were right all along.


Ceetar wrote:
Meh, it's not on Cespedes to care about how the media portrays him. Even when he's healthy and fine the MetsBeat is all "why is he playing golf so much? Maybe he shouldn't buy such flashy cars?" It doesn't matter if someone ( Isabel Vincent and Melissa Klein ) does a very well written and researched piece on Yoenis in Cuba coming from nothing and how he's enjoying the freedom of America. It's literally a story of the so-called American Dream and they still bashed him being too flashy.

The media doesn't need to be all "I don't know why you make me do this to you Yoenis" about it.


I'm going to disagree. You are both thinking logically and not in a communications/message management way.

First, Cespedes wouldn't be in this by himself. He's got an agent -- who has a vested interest in his client being successful -- who has a media team who would handle the logistics, such as the translator, and would work with him to develop talking points and show how to best answer questions. This is their job. Cespedes is paying them handsomely for their services. The Mets -- who I think should be the ones running such a presser -- also have people on staff to do this.

A person can argue that Cespedes is in this situation in the first place because they didn't step in and do this sooner. Now it's damage control.

There are many people who should be caring -- deeply -- about how Cespedes is portrayed in the media, including Cespedes himself. I suspect he -- and his agent -- enjoys his endorsement deals. The Mets should be caring about selling tickets, t-shirts, canary compression sleeves and such. Running down the reputation of your top player is a bad business decision.

Edgy, sorry of this is hijacking the thread.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 03:58 PM
Re: The Florry Story

d'Kong76 wrote:
I don't know, when 41F gets on a roll he sounds like a polished professional purveyor
of promotional propoganda. It's a baseball team, not capitol hill or whatever here.


I agree with this. At least for me, when I criticize the ownership (or anyone else) for bad behavior, his immediate response is not to focus on the bad behavior, but how to spin it to the public so that it sounds less bad. It's so reflexive and instinctive I don't think he notices it.

Beyond disagreeing about any subject, and I am not meaning to be inciteful here, but I really think this is a poor reflection on the character of a person.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 04:04 PM
Re: The Florry Story

41Forever wrote:
The Mets should be caring about selling tickets, t-shirts, canary compression sleeves and such. Running down the reputation of your top player is a bad business decision.


This is so frustrating. Yes, I agree that it's a bad business decision. The Wilpons haven't shows that they're very good at running a baseball team.

But can we just take a moment and acknowledge that running down the reputation of your top (or any) player is just a shit thing to do. Unless your guy is actually dogging it, trashing him because of some latent resentment is wrong. It's morally wrong.

I don't know why this is so hard for you to admit.

Sometimes it's not about the message. Or perception. It's about actions, and things you should and shouldn't do. Even if no one is watching.

Sometimes there is just the right thing to do, and a shit thing to do. And you shouldn't do the shit thing because that makes you a shit person.

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 04:06 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Centerfield wrote:
d'Kong76 wrote:
I don't know, when 41F gets on a roll he sounds like a polished professional purveyor
of promotional propoganda. It's a baseball team, not capitol hill or whatever here.


I agree with this. At least for me, when I criticize the ownership (or anyone else) for bad behavior, his immediate response is not to focus on the bad behavior, but how to spin it to the public so that it sounds less bad. It's so reflexive and instinctive I don't think he notices it.

Beyond disagreeing about any subject, and I am not meaning to be inciteful here, but I really think this is a poor reflection on the character of a person.


And I believe I always preface it by saying, "From a communications perspective, here's what they should do." You are coming at it from a perspective of an angry fan. I was contributing to the discussion by conveying how the team should handle it professionally.

And you are most certainly trying to incite and insult. Calling me a "shit person" also could be considered a poor reflection on the character of a person. I've disagreed with you, but I've never said anything like that.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 04:09 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I'm not calling you a shit person. I'm calling the Wilpons shit persons.

I'm saying you never agree with that. You never focus on that.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 04:12 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Our arguments basically follow the same path.

CF: Wow, the Wilpons did this shitty thing. They are shit people.

41F: They should really speak to the press in this way. That way they will seem less shitty.

My point is you never focus on the shitty behavior. Only on making the shitty behavior seem less shitty.

I'm asking you this, this one time, admit, that trashing your player who is trying to get back from injury is a shit thing to do. Not to focus on perception, or give me a lesson on branding, but to say yes, CF. Trashing your player and insinuating that he is dogging it is a shit thing to do.

Can you admit that?

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 04:22 PM
Re: The Florry Story

I said exactly that, but without the vulgarity. I said running down the reputation of your top player is a bad thing.

You have a visceral hatred of the Wilpons. I get it. I don't like everything they do, either. But I've lived through the M. Donald Grant era, so I know that things can be far worse. If you don't want engage in a discussion of communications practice then jump down to the next post. I thought some people might find it interesting.

cooby
Jul 13 2018 04:40 PM
Re: The Florry Story

My only problem wit cespedes is that he seems to have disappeared. You guys read the local rags; if I’m wrong I will certainly take my pier jumping comment back.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 05:02 PM
Re: The Florry Story

41Forever wrote:
I said exactly that, but without the vulgarity. I said running down the reputation of your top player is a bad thing.

You have a visceral hatred of the Wilpons. I get it. I don't like everything they do, either. But I've lived through the M. Donald Grant era, so I know that things can be far worse. If you don't want engage in a discussion of communications practice then jump down to the next post. I thought some people might find it interesting.


No. You said it was a bad business decision. Do you not see the difference?

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 05:13 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Centerfield wrote:
41Forever wrote:
I said exactly that, but without the vulgarity. I said running down the reputation of your top player is a bad thing.

You have a visceral hatred of the Wilpons. I get it. I don't like everything they do, either. But I've lived through the M. Donald Grant era, so I know that things can be far worse. If you don't want engage in a discussion of communications practice then jump down to the next post. I thought some people might find it interesting.


No. You said it was a bad business decision. Do you not see the difference?


Have the Wilpons actually said anything about Cespedes, or are you basing that on something the former general manager said, and assumed he was following their marching orders?

You certainly don't need my affirmation to hate anyone. And I can't figure out why you are making it personal.

Right now Cespedes has a problem. I was noting how he got there and recommending how he and the Mets should solve it. I guess I look at stuff from a problem-solving approach. I'm quirky that way.

Vic Sage
Jul 13 2018 06:21 PM
Re: The Florry Story

stretching for a throw at 1b is nowhere near as aggravating of his sort of injury as running hard after a line drive down the line into LF. Since we have him at big money for 2 (?) more years, it behooves us to find a way to keep him on the field. I'm good with a move to 1B as one way to do that.

Edgy MD
Jul 13 2018 06:43 PM
Re: The Florry Story

To the extent that stretching at first is an aggravation, I'd imagine it's more of a strain on the groin than the hammy.

#biomechanics

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 07:42 PM
Re: The Florry Story

41Forever wrote:
41Forever wrote:
I said exactly that, but without the vulgarity. I said running down the reputation of your top player is a bad thing.

You have a visceral hatred of the Wilpons. I get it. I don't like everything they do, either. But I've lived through the M. Donald Grant era, so I know that things can be far worse. If you don't want engage in a discussion of communications practice then jump down to the next post. I thought some people might find it interesting.


No. You said it was a bad business decision. Do you not see the difference?


Have the Wilpons actually said anything about Cespedes, or are you basing that on something the former general manager said, and assumed he was following their marching orders?

You certainly don't need my affirmation to hate anyone. And I can't figure out why you are making it personal.

Right now Cespedes has a problem. I was noting how he got there and recommending how he and the Mets should solve it. I guess I look at stuff from a problem-solving approach. I'm quirky that way.


You know, it really is shocking. How much you will dance around a simple question. Spinning and spinning and spinning, but never agreeing to (what I think) is a basic, irrefutable, truth.

Whether it's the Wilpons or Alderson who believe it, it is a real shit thing to trash your own player, accuse him of dogging it, and suggest that his contract was a bad signing.

You have suggested ways they can spin it, you have suggested ways Cespedes could have diffused it, you have claimed to have already agreed with me (you hadn't), and when called out, asked why I need your affirmation anyway (I don't). You have called into question why I'm "making it personal" and now you claim to be a problem solver who is "quirky".

But you have never, not once, despite six responses in this thread, despite me specifically asking you a very direct question multiple times, ever said "You're right CF, that is a really shitty thing that they did."

If you believe that, if you agree with that statement, it's incomprehensible why you resist saying so. It makes no sense.

I mean, I guess maybe you don't agree with me. That's ok. Then own it.

"Actually, CF, I disagree. I think it's totally cool to for an organization to make unwarranted attacks on their player's integrity. This is fine."

I think I'd be better with that. At least that's an honest answer.

Centerfield
Jul 13 2018 07:54 PM
Re: The Florry Story

And vulgarity? Really? Do my bad words offend you?

All I know is this. When I see injustice, I say:

"Holy crap, look at this fucked up bullshit. That shit needs to end right now."

You say:

"Wow, this is a shame. If those guys had just done X, they could have continued to do fucked up bullshit, without looking like they did fucked up bullshit. And should we really be saying "fucked up bullshit"? I mean, those are really bad words."

batmagadanleadoff
Jul 13 2018 08:02 PM
Re: The Florry Story

And all Jeff Wilpon has to do to be the best executive in MLB is to learn how to pivot. Mr. Bluebird on my shoulder.

41Forever
Jul 13 2018 08:24 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Centerfield wrote:
Centerfield wrote:
I said exactly that, but without the vulgarity. I said running down the reputation of your top player is a bad thing.

You have a visceral hatred of the Wilpons. I get it. I don't like everything they do, either. But I've lived through the M. Donald Grant era, so I know that things can be far worse. If you don't want engage in a discussion of communications practice then jump down to the next post. I thought some people might find it interesting.


No. You said it was a bad business decision. Do you not see the difference?


Have the Wilpons actually said anything about Cespedes, or are you basing that on something the former general manager said, and assumed he was following their marching orders?

You certainly don't need my affirmation to hate anyone. And I can't figure out why you are making it personal.

Right now Cespedes has a problem. I was noting how he got there and recommending how he and the Mets should solve it. I guess I look at stuff from a problem-solving approach. I'm quirky that way.


You know, it really is shocking. How much you will dance around a simple question. Spinning and spinning and spinning, but never agreeing to (what I think) is a basic, irrefutable, truth.

Whether it's the Wilpons or Alderson who believe it, it is a real shit thing to trash your own player, accuse him of dogging it, and suggest that his contract was a bad signing.

You have suggested ways they can spin it, you have suggested ways Cespedes could have diffused it, you have claimed to have already agreed with me (you hadn't), and when called out, asked why I need your affirmation anyway (I don't). You have called into question why I'm "making it personal" and now you claim to be a problem solver who is "quirky".

But you have never, not once, despite six responses in this thread, despite me specifically asking you a very direct question multiple times, ever said "You're right CF, that is a really shitty thing that they did."

If you believe that, if you agree with that statement, it's incomprehensible why you resist saying so. It makes no sense.

I mean, I guess maybe you don't agree with me. That's ok. Then own it.

"Actually, CF, I disagree. I think it's totally cool to for an organization to make unwarranted attacks on their player's integrity. This is fine."

I think I'd be better with that. At least that's an honest answer.


There is no reason to be so personal.

Yes, if anyone on the team -- from the owner to the bat boy -- is accusing a player of dogging it, it's unfair to the player and harmful to the team on several levels. It also sends a bad message to players who might someday consider signing with the team. It's a bad practice personally and professionally.

I should have used that as a preamble prior to discussing how the team and the player can address the problem.

Centerfield
Jul 15 2018 12:22 AM
Re: The Florry Story

I’m glad we were able to agree at the end.

41Forever
Jul 15 2018 01:44 AM
Re: The Florry Story

Centerfield wrote:
I’m glad we were able to agree at the end.


We agreed at the start. My approach was to look how the Mets and Cespedes could address the communications problems they created, which apparently revealed a deep flaw in my character.

Mickey today did give a more in-depth briefing into Cespedes condition and status and said he could potentially be activated and DHing in the MYF series after the break. Good news.

Centerfield
Jul 15 2018 02:02 PM
Re: The Florry Story

If you did agree with me from the start, it was not apparent. And when you refused to denounce those actions despite me asking you directly several times, then one can only conclude that you do not agree.

Your one and only focus is on how to make those behaviors seem less bad. You sprinkle in a dash of “well I’ve lived through much worse”. All of this sends the message that not only do you not oppose the behavior, but that you tacitly condone it.

If, as you say, you find the behavior offensive, then from a communications perspective, this needs to be made explicit in your initial statement. You have never done this. Not in this thread, not in any of our discussions before. I see that you concede that now. I think this will help our discussions going forward.

I would also suggest, from a communications perspective, to leave all comparisons to Grant out of these discussions. The “Well I’ve seen worse” argument is not offered by anyone who agrees that the behavior is offensive. It’s offered by people who believe “what’s the big fucking deal”.

Let me illustrate.

Joe says: “Arod used steroids. What a shit person”

Bob says: “well I’ve seen worse. Chad Curtis raped underage girls.”

Do you believe that Bob thinks ARod did wrong? Or do you think Bob is making excuses for ARod?

This is how it appears all those times you bring up Grant when the name Wilpon appears.

In the end, only you know how you feel when no one else is looking. But I am telling you, as someone who has seen you react to multiple situations, the optics on your responses paint you in a bad light.

41Forever
Jul 15 2018 02:31 PM
Re: The Florry Story

It’s unfortunate that my level of disdain for the owners of my favorite baseball team doesn’t meet with your approval.

I don’t like many of the things they do, but I’m appreciative that my team has been to the postseason twice in the last four years. My personal experience with Fred Wilpon is limited to a short but pleasant conversation at a spring training game.

I’m sure there is room in the forum for a variety of opinions and approaches to discussion. If I was a professional finance guy I’d probably discuss their financial challenges. If I was a landscaper I’d talk about how they are handling the field. We’ll just have to move on.

Centerfield
Jul 15 2018 04:32 PM
Re: The Florry Story

Your level of disdain for the Wilpons is not the issue. Though that is a nice attempt to pivot.

I don’t care if you like the Wilpons or not. I care how you react to bad acts.

I rip the bad actors. You spin and downplay the bad acts. I get that this comes naturally as this is part of your job.

Condemning the bad acts is an afterthought, if it ever crosses your mind at all.

I think that says something about you and the people you work for.

You’re right. I guess we will just have to move on.