Master Index of Archived Threads


Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

Mex17 Dec 15 2018 07:10 AM

He hasn't started a game since he was a Met. Since then, he has had the same type of up and down loogy career as Blevins and Sipp. If his name wasn't Oliver Perez, I would say that you put him in the same classification. Obviously the past history here complicates that. Does BVW care? https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... g_standard

Lefty Specialist Dec 15 2018 07:20 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

We dare not.

seawolf17 Dec 15 2018 07:31 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

In. A. Heartbeat. He's exactly what we need. Bring him home, BVW.

RealityChuck Dec 15 2018 09:58 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

I have no problem bringing back Perez. Looking at his numbers, he's managed to be at least league average since becoming a reliever. Worth an offer.

smg58 Dec 15 2018 09:58 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

If 30 IP is the best he can do, then no.

Mex17 Dec 15 2018 10:58 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

smg58 wrote: If 30 IP is the best he can do, then no. I'm not sure that is fair considering what his role is now. All we need is for him to be the loogy.

Fman99 Dec 16 2018 05:22 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

I don't think I could handle it.

MFS62 Dec 16 2018 06:44 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

Fman99 wrote: I don't think I could handle it. I don't think I could handle it. Later

smg58 Dec 16 2018 08:51 AM Re: Dare we speak of Oliver Perez?

Mex17 wrote: smg58 wrote: If 30 IP is the best he can do, then no. I'm not sure that is fair considering what his role is now. All we need is for him to be the loogy. I'm all for giving Zamora some competition for the one-out role, but if I'm going to spend on a lefty, I'd rather pay more and get somebody who can be more than that, and then still have Zamora or somebody similar for one or two outs at a time.