Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 13 2019 09:04 PM

How Led Zeppelin turned tragedy into an iconic album cover



By Chuck Arnold



January 10, 2019 | 4:28pm | Updated


The iconic cover of Led Zeppelin's self-titled debut album — which launched one of the greatest bands in rock history when it came out 50 years ago, on Jan. 12, 1969 — famously features a black-and-white image of the zeppelin Hindenburg ablaze.



But the man who designed that classic album artwork would rethink using such a picture of the 1937 disaster. “A lot of people died,” says George Hardie, 74, recounting the 36 fatalities after the German airship caught fire in Manchester Township, NJ. “If you ever see a film of that event, you hear people screaming . . . I should have thought more about it — I would now.”



Actually, though, it was Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page's idea to use the image, which is based on a renowned photo by Sam Shere taken at the site of the explosion. Hardie — who had previously designed only one other album cover (for Jeff Beck's 1968 debut, “Truth”) — had presented another concept, depicting a zeppelin in the sky, but it was flatly rejected.



“It was just literally put to one side,” says Hardie, “and Jimmy Page said, ‘No, here's what I want.' And he opened a book to show me the photograph.”



All of this negotiation was going down as Led Zeppelin was about to play a big gig at the Marquee Club in London that night. “It was their first night at the club,” says Hardie. “[Lead singer] Robert Plant was coming back to the office, which was 100 yards away from the club, and saying, ‘Hey, the queue is getting bigger and bigger and bigger,' so that was quite exciting.”



The British artist had to come up with a clever way to replicate Shere's photo without actually using it or infringing on the copyright. Turning it into what is ostensibly an illustration, he altered it sufficiently.



“We were already in the world of Andy Warhol and a lot of other American pop artists using existing images to do things,” says Hardie, who used a Rapidograph pen for his ink rendering. “That was in the air at that time.”



Hardie's original idea would end up being used as a small logo on the back cover of both “Led Zeppelin” and “Led Zeppelin II,” which came out in October 1969. He later contributed to the band's artwork for “Presence” and “The Song Remains the Same,” both released in 1976, while also doing the cover designs for Pink Floyd's “The Dark Side of the Moon” (1973) and “Wish You Were Here” (1975).



But despite creating all of that vintage album art, Hardie is no vinyl junkie. “One of the strange things about my life is that I never had anything to play records on,” he says.



Nor did Hardie imagine — with those first pen strokes of the cover he was paid about $76 for — that Led Zeppelin would get a whole lotta love: “Everyone was terribly excited and told me they were gonna be very important, but I didn't know that. I didn't know enough about music.”


https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/led-zeppelin-1b.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1236&h=820&crop=1>



https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/led-zeppelin-album-1a.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=600>



Side One, Track One, Album One

[YOUTUBE]lsZG7n7ries[/YOUTUBE]



[YOUTUBE]hk3Bzss8hYI[/YOUTUBE]



[YOUTUBE]91pz1E8pAOY[/YOUTUBE]



[YOUTUBE]sTkeHnOsonU[/YOUTUBE]







and



https://vault-cdn.si.com/SI_ISSUE_IMAGES/Sports%20Illustrated/1969/01/19690120/Sports_Illustrated_40675_19690120-001-775-cover.jpg>



https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/IQxA6dJNjOKp4P1viCV269Dj3og=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/Q33BCCI7JE32WKZLO3RDRKKENI.jpg>



https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/qKZf__bQdo4Jsvhz8InJi25oX_I=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/FMKTCFMOKVAKQB27PMY3JER5R4.jpg

>

[YOUTUBE]RW5GnZCxqIw[/YOUTUBE]

cal sharpie
Jan 14 2019 07:16 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Kind of weird that an album would be released on a Sunday.

whippoorwill
Jan 14 2019 08:39 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Two very cool articles. That little girl is having a ball.



Never noticed Joe Namath's one eye kinda veered off

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 19 2019 11:48 PM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Not much Jets follow-up commentary in this thread. The 50th anniversary of the Jets Super Bowl win and lone Super Bowl appearance -- is that something to celebrate or to get depressed about? That win came in the last season of the AFL. The two leagues would merge for the following 1969-70 season. Which means that the Jets, arguably, have the worst history of any team during the merger era. Me, I was too young to have noticed that crowning season -- I began to follow the NFL just a short while after. And though it wasn't more than a year, year and a half after SupeIII that I started paying attention, the Jets had by then, declined so rapidly, that some youngster like me, with an underdeveloped sense of history, would be hard pressed to know exactly how great the Jets were just a little bit before. Namath wasn't even that good anymore, by then plagued with deteriorating knees and injuries that would keep him out for long stretches of time. It was kind of like the reverse of being a new Mets fan -- rooting for a contender with the best pitcher in baseball and probably the best pitching staff in all of baseball as well, not really appreciating how awful the franchise was during its origin phase.

Fman99
Jan 20 2019 05:13 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Along with Physical Graffiti, I find the first LZ record to be the one that holds up the best to relistening at this point. It's the blueprint, really, for what they'd end up being their entire run. I just did a reworked version of "How Many More Times" at open mic this past week, solo, acoustically (you can see me doing a bit of it in the same style in this video from my IG feed, I think I nuked the original Youtube recording inadvertently).

kcmets
Jan 20 2019 09:58 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

http://a.fn.fncdn.com/images/getty/comp/wuCrxC.jpg>

MFS62
Jan 20 2019 10:06 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

I watched it sitting in my old black recliner.

My wife threw it out a few years after that.

Come to think of it, the Jets haven't won a Super Bowl since then. She jinxed them.

Later

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 20 2019 10:21 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Correction: 1970-71 was the first NFL merger season.

kcmets
Jan 20 2019 11:07 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

l, ll and lll weren't really Super Bowls, right. They're just are referred to as SB's.

Frayed Knot
Jan 20 2019 11:54 AM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

My recollection is that III was the first one they referred to as the Super Bowl. One of the owner's kids (or maybe grandkids) had one of those hard rubber 'Super Balls' that could bounce real high and they adapted it from there.

Earlier than that it was simply the NFL-AFL Championship.



And, btw, simply because the NFL refers to it as a merger doesn't make it one. It was really just a flat out takeover of the one league by the other

But 'Merger' has become like 'Bye Week' or 'Preseason Game', phrases that the NFL has decreed be used because they sound better than 'Takeover', 'Off Week', or 'Exhibition Game' even as the former ones are all

somewhat less accurate than their latter counterparts. But, as usual, they've gotten time and a passive press has made their version of things become the official one.

kcmets
Jan 20 2019 12:32 PM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Frayed Knot wrote:
My recollection is that III was the first one they referred to as the Super Bowl.

Yes, you are correct.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 20 2019 01:12 PM
Re: 50 Years Ago, Yesterday. A Twofer Golden Anniversary

Frayed Knot wrote:

My recollection is that III was the first one they referred to as the Super Bowl. One of the owner's kids (or maybe grandkids) had one of those hard rubber 'Super Balls' that could bounce real high and they adapted it from there.

Earlier than that it was simply the NFL-AFL Championship.


Super Bowl III was the first championhip officially referred to as a Super Bowl. But the two prior AFL-NFL championships were also referred to as Super Bowls. The term first came into public usage before the start of the 1966-67 AFL and NFL regular seasons -- the first year that would pit teams from both rival leagues in a championship matchup, and was used quite commonly by the public before its official designation.





https://cdn.herosports.com/upload/files/2016/07/packers-super-bowl-1.jpg>