Master Index of Archived Threads
MLB.TV
A Boy Named Seo Apr 03 2006 05:12 PM |
I'm on it again for the 4th year in a row, but it seems like this year you can't choose between using Windows Media or the Real player. I thought Real looked so much more crisp the last couple of years and will be bummed if I'm stuck win Windows Media. Anyone else on MLB.TV? If so, do you know if this is the case?
|
A Boy Named Seo Apr 12 2006 11:47 PM |
Why MLB.TV blows
|
TransMonk Apr 13 2006 12:14 AM |
I'm on MLBTV for the first year after 5+ years of their audio program.
|
A Boy Named Seo Apr 13 2006 12:22 AM |
Yeah, I don't know how they pick which feed they're going to go with. I dig how you can choose home or away team's broadcast with radio, but with TV, it's completely random and always has been.
|
duan Apr 13 2006 01:11 PM |
hey, what kind of connection do people have that are using mlb.tv.
|
TransMonk Apr 13 2006 01:20 PM |
I have DSL...it's more than enough.
|
holychicken Apr 13 2006 01:23 PM |
||||
I am on year 3 or 4, can't remember. I have always used real player however, this year, the picture seems to be the best. I don't get as much of the pixelization when there is a lot of movement that I got in the past. I have no complaints about the picture quality.
You hate that? I love it! It is so much nicer to have a big non-cluttered view of the game. Free yourself from your crutch!
To me it appears that they just have a sound feed and a video feed and there is no syncronization. Many-a-time I have wanted to see a replay, they are talking about it but it is just showing the pitcher or something.
Yeah, I totally agree with this. The camera used ot just stare out on the field when you didn't get the local commericals. . . now that stupid screen comes up. I liked the no commercials things because you felt like you were at the game (sort of). But the blue screen commercials really suck.
|