Master Index of Archived Threads


IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

ashie62 Apr 29 2019 04:55 AM

Reds have shown some life thus far but Tanner Roark does not scare me. Zack should scare them Who plays 2b and does Alonso hit third. LGM

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:46 AM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

I'd be highly surprised if anybody not named "McNeil" is playing second.

Ceetar Apr 29 2019 07:52 AM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Edgy MD wrote: I'd be highly surprised if anybody not named "McNeil" is playing second. Lowrie?

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:23 AM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

I'd be highly surprised.

kcmets Apr 29 2019 01:11 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

[TWEET]https://twitter.com/Mets/status/1122940880032235520[/TWEET]

Ceetar Apr 29 2019 01:23 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Cano MRI negative, just swollen.

ashie62 Apr 29 2019 03:49 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Great on Cano. Lowrie playing rehab games Alonso 2nd Nimmo 3rd

bmfc1 Apr 29 2019 05:43 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Is there anyone else to DFA?

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 05:53 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Cracklin', Rosey

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 05:54 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

And the wheels of Ramos.

LWFS Apr 29 2019 06:21 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Did I just have a stroke, or did a Lou Brock graphic with musical stinger just pop on the screen?

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 06:41 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

It's been happening since last year. Every time Keef brings up Lou, the booth triggers the graphic.

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 06:42 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

This is a big moment.bases loaded 2 out 3-0 pitch

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 06:42 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Ball 4

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 06:42 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Alonso with the bags juiced and I keep picturing Batting Stance Guy. BALL FOUR! One-run game.

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 06:48 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Ball 4 again

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 06:49 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

[YOUTUBE]uN7vm-k-AaA[/YOUTUBE]

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 06:51 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

McNeil should have been breaking there. Lefty pitcher. Shift on Conforto. He should be halfway home at the start of the pitch.

Frayed Knot Apr 29 2019 07:16 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

You know what would stop these silly hair-splitting challenges: you get it wrong and you lose your challenge for the next game

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 07:18 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Lorenzen didn't Homer, but got down the line and made that a play

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:24 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Sometimes I forget how much Keith loves guys adding to their RBI totals.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:26 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Frayed Knot wrote: You know what would stop these silly hair-splitting challenges: you get it wrong and you lose your challenge for the next game That might be over-engineering. Only allow challenges to be made on the field and immediately, give the umps Bluetooth headsets, and the world is much more in alignment.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:37 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Go, Laggy!!! Votto is so consistently terrific. It's surprising that he's only won one MVP.

Frayed Knot Apr 29 2019 07:49 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Edgy MD wrote: Frayed Knot wrote: You know what would stop these silly hair-splitting challenges: you get it wrong and you lose your challenge for the next game That might be over-engineering. Only allow challenges to be made on the field and immediately, give the umps Bluetooth headsets, and the world is much more in alignment. Sure. But that play was a virtual and obvious tie at best, so the idea that the game gets stopped, for how ever long it gets stopped, so that the umps can decide a coin flip isn't within a Pete Alonso HR of what the rule was intended to "correct". If only this kind of silliness could have been foreseen prior to employing the rule!

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:51 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Frazier went down looking at a neck-high fastball. That's some weird umping.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 07:57 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Let Lugo keep going, man.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:02 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Well, that was a very Frazier inning.

41Forever Apr 29 2019 08:05 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Wow, I thought we were toast there.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:12 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

I don't know what is going to happen here, but I'm pretty over the moon that McNeil is putting teams in the position of walking him to get to Alonso.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:13 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Pete's got to stay a little more within himself in situations like that.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:20 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Shmedwin.

bmfc1 Apr 29 2019 08:21 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Maybe it wasn't a good idea to pitch Diaz 3 days in a row.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:24 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Mets need Nieuwenhuis here.

Johnny Lunchbucket Apr 29 2019 08:27 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Well that sucked

Centerfield Apr 29 2019 08:27 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

We may not be a very good team.

Edgy MD Apr 29 2019 08:29 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

All three ninth-inning dudes came up swinging for the fences at balls out of the strike zone, and taking changeups inside the strikezone. I think I'ma need to talk with Chili. The Mets should have won this game twice over.

kcmets Apr 29 2019 08:35 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Winker waving to the crowd on exiting with the win. Uh, ya know it's a four game series ya wanker.

Fman99 Apr 30 2019 05:21 AM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Yeah. Sucky ending. No me gusta.

Benjamin Grimm Apr 30 2019 07:11 AM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

http://potg.ultimatemets.com/images/schaefer30.jpg> Cast your vote!

Edgy MD Apr 30 2019 01:27 PM Re: IGT 4/29 Reds v Mets Zack Tanner

Frayed Knot wrote: Edgy MD wrote: Frayed Knot wrote: You know what would stop these silly hair-splitting challenges: you get it wrong and you lose your challenge for the next game That might be over-engineering. Only allow challenges to be made on the field and immediately, give the umps Bluetooth headsets, and the world is much more in alignment. Sure. But that play was a virtual and obvious tie at best, so the idea that the game gets stopped, for how ever long it gets stopped, so that the umps can decide a coin flip isn't within a Pete Alonso HR of what the rule was intended to "correct". If only this kind of silliness could have been foreseen prior to employing the rule! If the defense loses a challenge, the next batter is automatically awarded first base. If the offense loses a challenge, the next batter is automatically out. Higher stakes. If you lose the challenge, you don't end up back where you're started, but rather, you're doubly screwed.