Master Index of Archived Threads


IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Edgy MD May 04 2019 06:28 PM

We're in the fifth, man.

MFS62 May 04 2019 06:36 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Dynamic disinterest. Down 2-1. Rosario triple drove in Ramos. The Kentucky Derby took less time than it took him to score. And, of course, it's Gio F'n Gonzales weaving his magic against the Mets. Later

Fman99 May 04 2019 06:40 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Yeah that's sad for us. I been watching and kinoodling on my gee-tar.

Edgy MD May 04 2019 06:54 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Maybe putting Frank Taveras back at shortstop may not have been the best play.

Edgy MD May 04 2019 06:55 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

On the other hand, great DP turned.

MFS62 May 04 2019 07:31 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Three, count 'em, three hits through eight innings. Yech. Later

Frayed Knot May 04 2019 07:32 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

It kind of doesn't matter if the Brewers use Hader in relief or not, because it's not like we hit any of the other relievers either. It's less dramatic w/o Hader but the results are virtually identical.

Frayed Knot May 04 2019 07:40 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Frayed Knot wrote: It kind of doesn't matter if the Brewers use Hader in relief or not, because it's not like we hit any of the other relievers either. It's less dramatic w/o Hader but the results are virtually identical. Until now I mean.

Fman99 May 04 2019 07:41 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

BOO YA!

ashie62 May 04 2019 07:41 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Alonso ties it!

ashie62 May 04 2019 07:43 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Was starting to feel like last season but without the winning streak

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 08:05 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Lugo getting it dunn

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 08:13 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

We gotta hit the Jacob Rhame of Milwaukee.

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 08:16 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Home unis say Milwaukee on the front. Another reason to hate this pathetic franchise

Fman99 May 04 2019 08:24 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Impressive work tonight by Loogie. Let's put this fucker to bed.

nymr83 May 04 2019 09:14 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

how the heck is this game still going.

kcmets May 04 2019 09:18 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

14th inning stretch

bmfc1 May 04 2019 09:20 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

RosERRIO

kcmets May 04 2019 09:22 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Oh Rosie, no!!

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:31 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

We need to send ZimmO to Syracuse

41Forever May 04 2019 09:33 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

He looks lost.

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:34 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

If Gomez is hitting let's do it

bmfc1 May 04 2019 09:36 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Johnny Lunchbucket wrote: We need to send ZimmO to Syracuse Take Rosario with him.

bmfc1 May 04 2019 09:37 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Johnny Lunchbucket wrote: If Gomez is hitting let's do it .242 for what that's worth. Hit a HR tonight.

kcmets May 04 2019 09:37 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Oh Rosie, no!!

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:37 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

The Mets make a few terrible plays every night now. Had they not made an error back in the 2nd this godamn game would be over

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:39 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Nido Nido, because Nido

41Forever May 04 2019 09:44 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Gselly has nasty stuff tonight!

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:48 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Well let's fuck things up again

nymr83 May 04 2019 09:48 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

a doubleplay, thats what we needed! this team looks inept

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:53 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Hech of a catch

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 09:55 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Sweet 16th for gzelly.

41Forever May 04 2019 10:07 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

You had to figure Flexen was waving the white flag. First pitch double.

41Forever May 04 2019 10:11 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Apologies to Flexen as the Mets get out of the jam!

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:12 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Maybe we can send Rosario to the Pacific Northwest...

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 10:14 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Rosie having a tough time. Needs to shave his awful Beard

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 10:15 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

ZimmO can't do anything right

nymr83 May 04 2019 10:16 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Matz is the first pitcher to bat as a pinch-hitter? isnt he the worst hitter out of the Syndergaard/deGrom/Matz threesome?

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:18 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

This is a short game considering it's 18 innings long....

bmfc1 May 04 2019 10:19 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

What was the Tim McCarver line about long games: "you can go into a game like this hot and come out in a slump"?

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 10:21 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

McNeil is for McReal

nymr83 May 04 2019 10:21 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

YEAH BABY!

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:22 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

What was the Tim McCarver line about long games: "you can go into a game like this hot and come out in a slump"? It looks like McNeil will come out on a hot streak...

bmfc1 May 04 2019 10:22 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

I think that we all yelled "SEND HIM!" at the same time.

41Forever May 04 2019 10:23 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Nice!!! Come on, Flexie! Let's get this!

kcmets May 04 2019 10:23 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Easy Gary, you'll have a stroke!!

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:24 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

I thought Angel Hernandez was no longer umpiring... Must have been wishful thinking on my part...

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 10:26 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

C'mon Flexy. Need you, Kid.

bmfc1 May 04 2019 10:31 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Did they consider Noah for an inning?

kcmets May 04 2019 10:33 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread? Edited 1 time(s), most recently on May 04 2019 10:34 PM

Lotta strikes being called balls, guess blue is hungry.

nymr83 May 04 2019 10:33 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

fuck you, flexen

Johnny Lunchbucket May 04 2019 10:33 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

Fuckshit

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:33 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

I fucking hate Ryan Braun

bmfc1 May 04 2019 10:34 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

[TWEET]https://twitter.com/thePeteyMac/status/1124894405654122501[/TWEET] F U Angel Hernandez.

dgwphotography May 04 2019 10:34 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

=kcmets post_id=9166 time=1557030804 user_id=53] Lotta strikes being called balls, guess blue is hungry.

Two words: Angel Hernandez

nymr83 May 04 2019 10:35 PM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

=bmfc1] F U Angel Hernandez.

worst umpire in the history of umpiring.

MFS62 May 05 2019 06:10 AM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

=nymr83 post_id=9172 time=1557030926 user_id=54] =bmfc1] F U Angel Hernandez.

worst umpire in the history of umpiring.


You are the master of the understatement.

Later

Edgy MD May 05 2019 11:46 AM Re: IGT 5/4 Did we really not have a thread?

The only reason transitioning to robo-umps is under serious consideration is because of Angel Hernandez. If he got fired tomorrow, the union would be up in arms. But keeping him in the umping pool is actually creating a threat to everybody else. Is that overstated? Anyhow, looks like I could have waited until the 14th to start the thread.