Master Index of Archived Threads


POLL on Wright deal

Would you do it?

Yes	8 votes
No	13 votes

Bret Sabermetric Apr 15 2006 06:16 PM

How many would trade David Wright for Willis and Cabrera straight up today, with no guarantees of anything other than that the deal will be taken off the table forever if you don't sign the papers right this second?

KC Apr 15 2006 06:51 PM

I took no. I don't like Dontrell's delivery and I think he's a long term risk. I like Miguel, who doesn't? But if the Mets want him to play the outfield (yes, I think he's a better outfielder than an infielder ... gasp) they can sign him as a FA. There are certain players that an organization just simply don't trade. David Wright is one of them, and I don't care what the fantasy stats say about that on 4/15/2006. I may change my mind on 5/16/2006 and anyone who cares to (though I can't imagine why they would) can archive that.

metsmarathon Apr 15 2006 07:15 PM

i voted no. yeah, in the thread i said i would probably make the move. i realize that. but if you come up to me with this deal, and tell me i have exactly one second (or require some similar instantaneaous response) then i tell you to fuck off.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 15 2006 08:05 PM

That's nice. If I'm Florida, I look for some other sucker to take two All-Stars off my hands. Pleasure doing business with you, though.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 15 2006 08:41 PM

This is a no-brainer, I think, if you throw in their choice of any pitcher in the Mets' organization, that's how much of a no-brainer the just-Wright deal is. Who would they take? Pedro? If they could afford Pedro they wouldn't be dealing Dontrelle. Bannister? Well, someone's got to lose a rotation spot if the Mets get Dontrelle. Buh-bye. Zambrano? Good riddance. Humber? Got to give to get. And I believe I'm Wright's biggest fan on the CPF, so this isn't about his ability. It's about "Do you want the Mets to get better or not?" Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site.

Nymr83 Apr 15 2006 09:04 PM

]Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site. Sometimes I think you post just to annoy Mets fans on this site.

Elster88 Apr 15 2006 09:39 PM

Bret Sabermetric wrote: This is a no-brainer, I think, if you throw in their choice of any pitcher in the Mets' organization, that's how much of a no-brainer the just-Wright deal is. Who would they take? Pedro? If they could afford Pedro they wouldn't be dealing Dontrelle. Bannister? Well, someone's got to lose a rotation spot if the Mets get Dontrelle. Buh-bye. Zambrano? Good riddance. Humber? Got to give to get. And I believe I'm Wright's biggest fan on the CPF, so this isn't about his ability. It's about "Do you want the Mets to get better or not?" Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site. If Wright was guaranteed to sign when he hits free agency, but you have no guarantees of resigning Willis and Cabrera, would you make the trade? I wouldn't, because it seems like putting all your eggs in one basket for this year. George would love to throw money at those guys and steal them away from the Mets if we picked them up in a trade. Especially with Sheffield heading out and Randy and Mussina decomposing. It's just too risky. Wright ain't going anywhere. We can make our bid for those guys when free agency comes up.

Elster88 Apr 15 2006 09:41 PM

]Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site Whoa whoa whoa, I thought you turned your Met-fan membership card in. Come on back when the weather turns fair.

ABG Apr 15 2006 11:45 PM

I voted yes, because voting no would be dumb.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 16 2006 06:22 AM

So far, 10 to 5 in favor of "dumb"--seems about right to me.

Iubitul Apr 16 2006 06:54 AM

Bret Sabermetric wrote: So far, 10 to 5 in favor of "dumb"--seems about right to me. Make that 11 to 5. So I'm dumb, sue me.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 16 2006 06:57 AM

Elster88 wrote: ]Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site Whoa whoa whoa, I thought you turned your Met-fan membership card in. Come on back when the weather turns fair. Exactly. If I'm the most loyal Mets fan on this site, meaning I'm the one person who actually approves of things that would help the Mets while all the rest of you (except for 4 others, I guess) are favoring plans that would worsen the team, what does that tell you about Mets fans in general? That they like losing? That they have to think long and hard about whether having one excellent 23 year old star is better than having two excellent 23 year old stars, and finally coming up with the wrong answer? That they don't know the difference between loyalty (to a homegrown player who, like Fonzie and Straw, could easily decide to leave the nest in four more years) and developing the team? Hell, David Wright's family would endorse this trade, if they were real Mets fans. This is another stupid deal, stupid only in that the Marlins could easily get more for Willis and Cabreara as a package, so it ain't happening, but the colossal arrogance of Mets fans to say "No, we need more" to an incredibly sweet deal just speaks volumes about the reasons I have such contempt for this organization and its dumbest, most "loyal" fans, who richly deserve the team they've gotten for the last five years.

seawolf17 Apr 16 2006 06:58 AM

No, I think this is a situation where we're only saying no because the person who started the poll is acting like an ass.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 16 2006 07:10 AM

Thank you for having the honesty to say that you're saying stupid shit because you don't like me. That kind of honesty is often disguised in long tedious explanations of what I'm saying about baseball. You'd be hard pressed to state what exactly I'm saying that's ass-like, but that's okay. Why don't you start a poll with the same neutral wording and see how the voting comes out when it has nothing to do with me, or a referendum on my Met-hating character? I'll bet you'll be surprised by the results. This is really a strange phenonomen. Normally, when someone joins a messageboard and starts saying stupid shit he doesn't really believe for a second but does it only to irritate people and enflame their emotions, he gets labelled a troll and quickly banned for provocative, immature and uncollegial behavior. You're telling me that this entire forum has decided to act like trolls, rather than accept that sometimes I write some things that you agree with? This gets less and less credible all the time.

Bret Sabermetric Apr 16 2006 07:18 AM

And sorry to be leaving before reading your response, but I'm going out of town for a few days without internet access for the most part.

seawolf17 Apr 16 2006 07:54 AM

It's kinda like when your crazy, drunk old Uncle Jack starts throwing political discourse around the holiday dinner table; you might agree with him, but you can't do it at that particular moment, because he's an ass and nobody will ever take him seriously. In fact, you don't say anything at all, because anything you say sets him off, embarassing the whole family. You're the CPF's crazy old Uncle Sal. You're part of the family, and you bring character to the room, but the discussion is so much more enjoyable when you're passed out in front of the TV.

mlbaseballtalk Apr 16 2006 09:02 AM

Bret Sabermetric wrote: This is another stupid deal, stupid only in that the Marlins could easily get more for Willis and Cabreara as a package, so it ain't happening, but the colossal arrogance of Mets fans to say "No, we need more" to an incredibly sweet deal just speaks volumes about the reasons I have such contempt for this organization and its dumbest, most "loyal" fans, who richly deserve the team they've gotten for the last five years. Sal, I'm not the one saying "No we need more" In fact, its THAT mentaility that I'm railing against. Do you want the Mets to be the scourge of baseball and the world? Because thats the MFY, and we would be heading into that direction if we made such a trade

Elster88 Apr 16 2006 09:48 AM

Bret Sabermetric wrote: This is a no-brainer, I think, if you throw in their choice of any pitcher in the Mets' organization, that's how much of a no-brainer the just-Wright deal is. Who would they take? Pedro? If they could afford Pedro they wouldn't be dealing Dontrelle. Bannister? Well, someone's got to lose a rotation spot if the Mets get Dontrelle. Buh-bye. Zambrano? Good riddance. Humber? Got to give to get. And I believe I'm Wright's biggest fan on the CPF, so this isn't about his ability. It's about "Do you want the Mets to get better or not?" Sometimes I think I'm the only loyal Mets fan on this site. If Wright was guaranteed to sign when he hits free agency, but you have no guarantees of resigning Willis and Cabrera, would you make the trade? I wouldn't, because it seems like putting all your eggs in one basket for this year. George would love to throw money at those guys and steal them away from the Mets if we picked them up in a trade. Especially with Sheffield heading out and Randy and Mussina decomposing. It's just too risky. Wright ain't going anywhere. We can make our bid for those guys when free agency comes up.

KC Apr 16 2006 09:58 AM

This gets less and less credible all the time.

metsmarathon Apr 16 2006 12:51 PM

not to start arguing for crazy uncle sal, but i'm pretty sure willis and cabrera don't get their free agency rights until after next season.

Rotblatt Apr 16 2006 01:06 PM

Both Willis and Cabrera are eligible for free agency after 2009. Wright is eligible for free agency after 2010. You all are absolutely completely batshit crazy if you don't think 8 combined years of Cabrera and Willis is worth more than 5 years of Wright. The only reason Florida might be willing to make such a stupid move would be because they would get one more non-arbitration eligible year from Wright than they would from Willis & Cabrera, who are going to set records when they are eligible. Figure it's a savings of $20M for them in 2007 unless they managed to sign them to backloaded contracts that bought out their arb-eligible years. Doubtful unless they manage to get a new stadium or move somewhere.

Elster88 Apr 16 2006 01:09 PM

Wow. I thought Willis and Cabrera were up for free agency after this year. I take it all back. Make that trade NOW!!!

metsmarathon Apr 16 2006 01:44 PM

hey, like i said in the thread, i'deventually makew teh trade. i'd just need a bit more than a second's sorth of soul-searching before i pulled the trigger that sent away the latest face of the franchise. i mean, at some point a team's gotta keep tehir own players, right?

Elster88 Apr 16 2006 04:28 PM

I think marathon is drunk too.

*62 Apr 16 2006 05:37 PM

="metsmarathon"]not to start arguing for crazy uncle sal, but i'm pretty sure willis and cabrera don't get their free agency rights until after next season. they'll only be eligible for arbitration .......... free agency requires six years ML service