Master Index of Archived Threads
Jake Factor +++++
Johnny Lunchbucket Dec 05 2019 09:03 AM |
|
Centerfield Dec 05 2019 09:05 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Johnny Lunchbucket Dec 05 2019 09:07 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Johnny Lunchbucket Dec 05 2019 09:09 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Centerfield Dec 05 2019 09:18 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
seawolf17 Dec 05 2019 09:19 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
bmfc1 Dec 05 2019 09:21 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Johnny Lunchbucket Dec 05 2019 09:25 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 09:25 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
bmfc1 Dec 05 2019 09:31 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Centerfield Dec 05 2019 09:33 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Johnny Lunchbucket Dec 05 2019 09:35 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Centerfield Dec 05 2019 09:39 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Ceetar Dec 05 2019 09:59 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
=Centerfield post_id=27739 time=1575563601 user_id=65] |
LWFS Dec 05 2019 10:17 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
We're going to be seeing a lot of each other this off-season, aren't we, Running Gag?
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 10:34 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
||
As long as the Wilpons continue to Wilpon.
|
Ceetar Dec 05 2019 10:36 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Lefty Specialist Dec 05 2019 10:45 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 10:50 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
=Ceetar post_id=27758 time=1575567376 user_id=102] |
Vic Sage Dec 05 2019 11:16 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 11:20 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Gilkey had but one good year for the Mets. Granted, it was a tremendously good one good year. But he sucked after that. Like, really sucked. Thus, the Lagares comparison.
|
Vic Sage Dec 05 2019 11:28 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Edgy MD Dec 05 2019 11:29 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 11:39 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
The point I was making was about players still getting playing time past their expiration dates. Lagares hasn't fielded like he did in his GG days for a while now. And Gilkey sucked other than in '96.
|
Ceetar Dec 05 2019 11:56 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
=batmagadanleadoff post_id=27763 time=1575568201 user_id=68] |
Vic Sage Dec 05 2019 12:05 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2019 12:12 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
I totally agree with your analysis and I even recognized it as I was making the Gilkey analogy in the earlier Lagares post. I made the analogy anyway because to this day, Gilkey's bad Met years still resonate powerfully with me. I remember clamoring really bad for Gilkey's playing time to be reduced as he was sucking in real time. But I get it. Gilkey deserved and got the benefit of the doubt because his 1996 season was too damn good and not so far removed from his decline. And a manager in that situation has the right to believe it's just a temporary slump.
|
MFS62 Dec 05 2019 07:56 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
He is a "never was" who will never be even a "might be". But I guess for the near term, you need a center fielder or (to paraphrase Casey Stengel) "You're gonna' give up a lot of triples". Later
|
ashie62 Dec 06 2019 05:26 AM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Edgy MD Dec 06 2019 04:43 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
LWFS Dec 06 2019 08:36 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
|
Edgy MD Dec 06 2019 09:30 PM Re: Jake Factor +++++ |
All, Metly-Sounding Mets Prospect Team
|