Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Basketball, Beijing, and Bristol

Frayed Knot
Jul 10 2020 05:31 PM

So it seems that a Missouri Senator, Josh Hawley (R), wrote a letter (recently I guess) to NBA commissioner Adam Silver criticizing the league over its cozy and complicated relationship with China. Y'all

may recall that when the Houston Rockets owner expressed support for Hong Kong demonstrators back in October, China leaned on the league by canceling planned exhibition games there while the league

leaned on said owner to walk back his statements.



Now without without seeing the specific contents of the Senator's letter to Silver I'm not prepared to choose sides here (although the league absolutely caved to the Chinese government's denial of rights

and speech freedoms in HK), the part I do find interesting is that ESPN's lead NBA reporter, Adrian Wojnarowski, felt moved to respond to the Senator with a brief two word opinion on his letter: "Fuck You".

'Woj' (his obvious and necessary nickname) and network brass themselves have both now apologized for the response citing the unprofessional nature of it, etc.



So while all this is somewhat interesting to this non-basketball fan, here's my main interest in this whole story: Forget the tenor of the response, the more interesting question is why this reporter feels like

it's his duty to speak up for the league rather than just covering it? It's kind of a rhetorical question because I know what the answer is. The NBA is ESPN property and is treated essentially as the house

league around the halls of Bristol, CT. So it's not surprising that Woj feels (or maybe even is told) that his job description isn't just one of covering the league but cheerleading for it as well. I tended to

view that sort of shill coverage more endemic to college sports than pro but those lines of being blurred as well.



And look, if Wojnarowski wants to make the case that criticism of league actions over its handling of their interactions involving China last October is unwarranted then go right ahead. But his first reaction

to something so radical as a written letter was akin to saying that the mere act of criticizing, and maybe even questioning, the league that constitutes his sports beat isn't allowed on his watch and said

letter writer deserves strong condemnation that is both personal and public, obscenities included.



Wow!

MFS62
Jul 11 2020 04:59 AM
Re: Basketball, Beijing, and Bristol

If you're not familiar with him, Woj is to the NBA what Peter Gammons is (was?) to MLB, a well respected reporter who has become a voice for what is going on around the league.

I find it strange that the NBA supports the rights and freedoms of their players while in this case came down on the side a nation denying even more basic rights to people. (Actually, not so strange because they wanted to keep the money flowing from their relationship with China, exhibition games now, possible expansion in the future.)

Is Woj voicing his own opinion or the League's? The choice of wording is a separate issue.

Later

Frayed Knot
Jul 11 2020 06:23 PM
Re: Basketball, Beijing, and Bristol

=MFS62 post_id=40260 time=1594465183 user_id=60]Is Woj voicing his own opinion or the League's?



The problem is that he seems to think those are one in the same.

The focus is going to be on the language of his response when it really should be on the idea that he felt it part of his job to even make one as soon criticism was directed towards the league.

That he chose to immediately take this route despite supposedly being a working journalist should bother both him and his employer as well as those followers of the NBA who look to him

(at least theoretically) for coverage of the sport and not merely as a pr flack.