Master Index of Archived Threads
Best Prospects of 2002
Frayed Knot Jun 22 2005 12:49 PM |
With all the 'Trade 'em for Prospects' talk, I thought I'd take a look at how the top of the prospects field looked 3 years ago.
|
MFS62 Jun 22 2005 01:07 PM |
Looks like most of them have made it to the majors already, so whoever came up with that rating did a pretty good job.
|
soupcan Jun 22 2005 01:11 PM |
Wasn't Ryan Anderson the 6'10" kid that was being hailed as the next Unit?
|
Edgy DC Jun 22 2005 01:16 PM |
While I agree that it was more or less a good job, there's nothing remarkable about all of them making it to the majors "already." It's not like all of these guys were identified at 17. These rankings include all signed pre major-league talent at various stages of their professional career. Most had had at least two professional seasons at that point.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 22 2005 01:51 PM |
||
Yup. 2 or 3 shoulder surgeries later the M's finally released him.
Made the majors? Sure. My point wasn't to disparage the list-makers. But look at things this way: Suppose we time-shift this list 3 years and say that this list is this year's list. Now, if we were to deal either Floyd or Cameron for any one of the prospects listed above, which of them would make us NOT disappointed with the deal 3 years down the road? * Teixiera & Blalock for sure, and Peavy. * Prior & Beckett - even w/their up-and-down present. * Plus Morneau & Mauer - even if still more for their projected promise than current production But I'm not so sure there are any other slam-dunks. Choi & Nick Johnson are just now getting there and certainly could be worthwhile depending on how things go. And youngsters like Kotchman, Gonzalez, Johnson, Williams & maybe Kearns still have time to be real good. But that's still just 14 names (7 yesses & 7 maybes by my count - your mileage may vary) out of 40, meaning that approx 2/3 of the list are players we'd feel weren't worth the wait for the good player we gave up. And those guys are the BEST prospects. That's part of what's driving me nuts about the Met fans who act as if a theoretical Cano/Cameron deal is such a knee-jerk 'YES'. Now Cano is a bit different than the above list because the projection is less long-term since he's already made the big leagues. But the fact that he's never been considered anywhere near those guys means that his ceiling also isn't likely to be as high. "Trade 'em for Prospects" always sounds good and certainly has it's place. I just think it's a lot more of a hit-and-miss (and more miss than hit) than most fans acknowledge. On edit: And, just as an addedum to the list of those 7+ guys you would want -- Those are exactly the ones you'd never get in a trade!! Most of them - not sure about Peavy & Morneau - were very top of the draft / multi-million $ bonus / can't touch types. All of which makes the odds of a good deal for a current player to be even less of a sure thing.
|
seawolf17 Jun 22 2005 04:49 PM |
Boof must have been named after the "Teen Wolf" character.
|
Vic Sage Aug 31 2005 09:09 AM |
i'm sorry i missed this thread the first time.
|