Master Index of Archived Threads
Ball Busters
batmagadanleadoff Jun 09 2021 11:42 PM |
|
Here's a theory I've never heard until just now:
|
nymr83 Jun 10 2021 05:28 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2021 05:34 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
roger_that Jun 10 2021 06:10 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Johnny Lunchbucket Jun 10 2021 06:37 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Even worse is that it's the kind of careless leap to judgment that resonates with today's modern moron.
|
kcmets Jun 10 2021 06:39 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Gary went on about this last night a bit. Wondered if there will be any punishing ramifications
Funny memory: Years ago when we had season tickets our box mates for a year or two were Manhattan attorneys who just happened to represent Carl with his off-field issues. I couldn't get any juice out of them other than, "let's just say Mr. Everett's elevator doesn't stop at all the floors."
|
Fman99 Jun 10 2021 07:12 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 07:20 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
This, coincidentally, is the tagline for my new e-journal.
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 07:22 AM Re: Ball Busters |
||
I always thought you had a little more inside info on Carl than the average bear.
|
Ceetar Jun 10 2021 07:31 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
MFS62 Jun 10 2021 07:34 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
kcmets Jun 10 2021 07:36 AM Re: Ball Busters |
=Ceetar post_id=67463 time=1623331894 user_id=102] (Who's the Mets player rep this year? is it Alonso?) |
Marshmallowmilkshake Jun 10 2021 07:57 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Ceetar Jun 10 2021 08:47 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
kcmets Jun 10 2021 09:00 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Well, I was also pretty tight with HVAC Guy at Shea back then. Distant memories now...
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 01:21 PM Re: Ball Busters |
Without copious data on the subject, I hesitate to conclude that this goo is giving people both more spin on the ball and more control of where their pitch is going.
|
kcmets Jun 10 2021 01:29 PM Re: Ball Busters |
Certainly not control; and 'spin' is the latest analytic fad du jour fer sher.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 10 2021 01:43 PM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Spider Tack is like rosin on super steroids. Or steroids on steroids. You get the point. Here's one study to support what I just wrote, but you can surf the web for several others. I don't think that the (Ahem) revolutionary effects of Spider Tack are being disputed. There's no reason to conclude that Spider Tack is also increasing control. And rosin, which is legal, provides the sort of control that all players want -- to ensure that some poor unlucky batter isn't getting killed to death by a wayward pitch every other month. It's a balancing act. Some extra control via foreign substance is tolerated for the safety of everybody, even if the substance gives pitchers an edge through enhanced spin rates. But Spider Tack tilts the balance between better control and enhanced spin rates to the point of unreasonableness. It marginally enhances control, if even that, while increasing spin rates to the point where there are now apparently 10 or 20 Sandy Koufaxes in the majors.
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 01:48 PM Re: Ball Busters |
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 10 2021 02:02 PM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Maybe the higher the spin rate, the harder it is to control that pitch.
|
Ceetar Jun 10 2021 02:10 PM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 04:20 PM Re: Ball Busters |
||
I'm kind of thinking the same, which is completely counter to Alonso's logic.
|
Edgy MD Jun 10 2021 04:44 PM Re: Ball Busters |
|
MFS62 Jun 11 2021 07:56 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
Edgy MD Jun 11 2021 08:09 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
MFS62 Jun 11 2021 08:19 AM Re: Ball Busters |
||
That was Alonso's comment in the first post in this thread.
Later
|
Edgy MD Jun 11 2021 08:32 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|
MFS62 Jun 11 2021 08:35 AM Re: Ball Busters |
|