Master Index of Archived Threads


Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

Marshmallowmilkshake Oct 19 2021 07:33 AM

Joel Sherman sure does seem to think we should be, with some kinda sorta disclaimers mixed in there. [url]https://nypost.com/2021/10/18/jeff-luhnow-a-risky-potential-mets-option-with-others-declining/ I'd rather keep looking. It sounds like the Astros won games but had a horrible culture, even if you take out the cheating.

MFS62 Oct 19 2021 07:43 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

4) concerned about the general dysfunction that swirled around the Mets. Wouldn't it be the job of the new person to turn that around? The candidate they would want wouldn't see that as an obstacle, but as a challenge. Later

Edgy MD Oct 19 2021 08:16 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

He kind of loses me at "hell."

Benjamin Grimm Oct 19 2021 08:44 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

Even if you can get past his tarnished record with the Astros, there's still the fact that his name is Jeff.

Willets Point Oct 19 2021 09:05 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

So he's basically saying "embrace the dysfunction!"

Edgy MD Oct 19 2021 09:32 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

Benjamin Grimm wrote: Even if you can get past his tarnished record with the Astros, there's still the fact that his name is Jeff. Yeah, but he makes it work for him. [fimg=550]https://cdnmarquee.comicskingdom.com/system/blog/feature/999/Family_Circus_v.20190714-8of9.jpg[/fimg]

ashie62 Oct 19 2021 11:47 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

Billy Beane has come to resemble Pat Sajak.

Benjamin Grimm Oct 19 2021 11:53 AM Re: Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

. Yeah, well, he's no Brad Pitt. http://ultimatemets.com/covers/2021/20211019_NYDN_02.jpg>