Master Index of Archived Threads
The CPF and Mets Winning
Is the CPF different when the Mets are winning?
Better - more fun | 5 votes |
Worse - less fun | 0 votes |
About the same level of fun | 7 votes |
Neither better nor worse | 3 votes |
I hadn't thought about it, but now I'll pay more attention. | 2 votes |
MFS62 Jun 15 2006 09:33 AM |
Do you think the CPF is different when the Mets are winning rather than losing?
|
Elster88 Jun 15 2006 09:35 AM |
Choices 3 and 4 are the same, no?
|
metirish Jun 15 2006 09:36 AM |
More fun, although there could be other reasons why things are more fun around here...
|
Yancy Street Gang Jun 15 2006 09:37 AM |
I think it's been more fun, but for the other reasons that Irish hinted at.
|
Elster88 Jun 15 2006 09:41 AM |
I went with #3. The Mets' winning has nothing to do with the level of fun around here.
|
MFS62 Jun 15 2006 09:46 AM |
Yancy, 88,
|
Edgy DC Jun 15 2006 11:51 AM |
More Karate Kid material is a good thing, and I guess more winining leads to more being a position to sweep the other teams legs, which triggers more Karate Kid material.
|
MFS62 Jun 15 2006 11:52 AM |
|
(bowing) No, Sensei. Later
|
Hillbilly Jun 15 2006 12:20 PM |
Back in the olden' days the best writing contributions came when good Met teams played badly (circa 1998-2000).
|
KC Jun 15 2006 01:00 PM |
I don't think the CPF funometer is any higher or lower with respect to the
|