Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Click


1/2 0 votes

* 0 votes

* 1/2 0 votes

* * 1 votes

* * 1/2 0 votes

* * * 0 votes

* * * 1/2 0 votes

* * * * 0 votes

* * * * 1/2 0 votes

* * * * * 0 votes

Edgy DC
Jul 01 2006 09:03 PM

I was surprised to find myself seeing this film tonight, I was.

ScarletKnight41
Jul 02 2006 06:48 AM

And what did you think of it? My suspicion is that we've already seen the best parts of it in the preview trailer.

Edgy DC
Jul 02 2006 10:04 AM

We were with a teen --- a thirteen-year-old to be more precise --- and she picked it.

You didn't miss nuthin'.

It was full of crass and tiresome vulgar jokes aimed at teenagers, until the second half turns into a sweet It's a Wonderful Life remake aimed at adults about appreciating what you've got in the present. The latter is probably not worth the embarassment of the former. I guess a shorter summary would be to say that it's an Adam Sandler film.

A few notable things.

  • Typically cheap and manipulative use of pop music on the soundtrack. Original scoring is saved only for when somebody is dying.
  • In flashback scenes, they dress Julie Kavner and Henry Winkler in some horrible orange latex masks that look like Fonzie and Brenda costumes. I swear, the thought of these masks is still disturbing me.

  • It's a universe pretty much entirely populated by bimbos. Even extras crossing the screen forty feet in the background came right off the set of Married, with Children
  • A snotty 10-year-old kid next door that inexplicably serves as Adam Sandler's rival is conspicuously outfitted in Mets trademarked stuff, the filmmakers seeming to suggest that, "Of course the kid is a two-bit brat, he's a Mets fan." Reason enough to steer clear of this film. Or anything else these filmmakers touch.