Master Index of Archived Threads


Would you do it? Milledge for Zito even up.

Would you do it? Milledge for Zito even up.

Yes	10 votes
No	11 votes

Yancy Street Gang Jul 28 2006 09:08 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jul 28 2006 10:15 AM

Adam Rubin in today's Daily News says that the current buzz states that the Mets can get Zito for Milledge in a one-for-one deal. Would you make that trade by the July 31 deadline?

metirish Jul 28 2006 09:12 AM

Yes if Omar could get Zito to commit to a long term deal....but Boras is now his agent so that might complicate things.

Yancy Street Gang Jul 28 2006 09:13 AM

I think we have to assume that there won't be a 72-hour window. I voted NO.

Elster88 Jul 28 2006 09:14 AM

No. Zito flys the coop once the season is over.

SteveJRogers Jul 28 2006 09:15 AM

I think the Mets and Boras relationshop has softened since the Beltran signing so I think we'd have a better shot than we did in the winter of 2000 By the way, I still don't see an ARod only merchandizing tent outside Legends Field, Yankee Stadium, I don't see MFY Stadium outfitted for a ARod only suite for his clients. Sometimes starting demands are just that, STARTING DEMANDS, and Steve Phillips should have been axed right there, as soon as he called ARod a 24 and 1 guy Piece of crap of a GM

Yancy Street Gang Jul 28 2006 09:15 AM

I don't think he flies the coop. I think the Mets will sign him in the off-season anyway. My objection is that Milledge isn't worth the two-plus additional months that we'd get out of Zito.

Iubitul Jul 28 2006 09:17 AM

another day, another defense of a Yankee.... Why trade Milledge for an extra 2-3 months of Zito? NO!

SteveJRogers Jul 28 2006 09:17 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jul 28 2006 09:57 AM

="Yancy Street Gang"]I don't think he flies the coop. I think the Mets will sign him in the off-season anyway. My objection is that Milledge isn't worth the two-plus additional months that we'd get out of Zito. I think he is, Milledge seems to be the same type of a 2nd tier OF star thats a dime a dozen, an interchangable part that you can get, sometimes at a cheap price on either trade or free agent market. Zito is a stud, going back to his first pitching coach will help Why not finally land someone long rumored to eventually be here

Elster88 Jul 28 2006 09:19 AM

="Yancy Street Gang"]I don't think he flies the coop. I think the Mets will sign him in the off-season anyway. My objection is that Milledge isn't worth the two-plus additional months that we'd get out of Zito. Either way, I vote no. But I don't think he signs with the Mets either way.

soupcan Jul 28 2006 09:22 AM

I say yes if Zito agrees to a contract before the trigger is pulled. If not., no.

seawolf17 Jul 28 2006 09:31 AM

No.

Johnny Dickshot Jul 28 2006 09:45 AM

I'd prefer we didn't. Steve J., would you please self-edit before saying dumb shit like Preston Wilson, Cliff Floyd, Mike Cameron are "dime a dozen," players and wasting our time to point out how easily that's proven wrong, and you're coming back and continuing to argue the point, and the discussion being joined, and the potential for it to get nasty before after a huge hijack where the point of the initial thread is destroyed and everyone's time has been wasted you offer a lame mea culpa to the effect of "I guess I shouldn't have said that," or "I gotta think more before I post." I'm asking you to think more before you post, before you post! Seriously. It's really wearing down the quality of the discussion here and wasting everyone's time. Floyd Cameron Wilson

Frayed Knot Jul 28 2006 09:50 AM

I vote No. We don't need Zito to get into the playoffs (if we collapse badly enough to fall out of them then we have bigger problems than just the ones he'll solve). We only "need" him to help us thru them. But the problem there is that he may only get one start; or only a couple. And maybe those starts aren't any good (happens all the time), or maybe they are but everyone else suxx, or he's good but it's not good enough, yyybbb. (See; Johnson, Randy / Houston 1999) We'd be dealing a big-time minor league chip (stop with this "Milledge is dime-a-dozen" stuff) for a few starts. That's not enough. And while we're on the subject: this sign-before-the-trade thing isn't going to happen for several reasons: - the A's would have to allow it - and actually they have to get permission from Sea-leg's office to do it. Then, if they did it for the Mets they'd have to do it for everyone which slows down other potential trades if this one falls through, etc. - Zito/Boras have to agree to negotiate with one team just 2 months before this 28 y/o lefty will be allowed to negotiate with all 30 ... and Boras ALWAYS takes his guys to FA-gency. Zito switched agents to Boras specifically for his potential move. - allowing it would drive the price up and probably no longer be for just Milledge (assuming that's a standing offer to start with) as the reason the price is so "low" to begin with is BECAUSE it's only a 2-month rental. - Can anyone tell me when the last time they've heard of this happening? ... I can't either. The only recent ones were where [u:19ac860678]the player[/u:19ac860678] controlled the agenda thru a no-trade deal (Schilling to Boston, Johnson to NYY). This contingency has happened in the past but it's very rare and I don't see it happening here.

ScarletKnight41 Jul 28 2006 09:52 AM

If we can get a contract extension as part of the deal, I vote yes. Sorry Iubitul - I'd have to pull the trigger on this one.

Yancy Street Gang Jul 28 2006 09:55 AM

How many people voted YES assuming there would be a negotiating window? I should have put in the poll that we'd have to assume there would NOT be such a window since, as Frayed Knot points out, it's extremely unlikely.

cooby Jul 28 2006 09:56 AM

I voted yes without giving it a second thought, but on second thought, only if there is a contract extension

Yancy Street Gang Jul 28 2006 10:00 AM

I didn't phrase the question well. Let's try again in a new thread: http://cybermessageboard.ehost.com/getalife/viewtopic.php?t=4165

Rotblatt Jul 28 2006 10:20 AM

Hm. I think Zito's a good pitcher but his undeserved Cy Young has created an equally undeserved reputation--not to mention a high asking price (I think Rubin's full of shit. All the other reporters seem to think that the deal would be Zito & Heilman. Still, for the purposes of the poll, I'm answering as though it were straight up). Anyway, Zito's having a nice year, but his peripherals continue to trend downward. Two of his main selling points are that he's young and durable--neither of which matter for shit in a 2-month rental. Now, if I had a guarantee that we could sign him to, say, a 4-year deal for $10M a year, I'd pull the trigger in a heartbeat, but if we're even able to get a deal done, it's far more likely to be a 6 or 7 year deal for $12M+, and that price, plus Milledge . . . It's a lot. I think we're better off hanging on to Milledge. He's only 21 years old and is putting up a line of .278 AVG/.397 OBP/.459 SLG, 12 SB in AAA this year. That's pretty fucking good, especially the progress he's made on his plate discipline. And after watching the dude play, it's hard to believe that some serious power won't come. He might end up being "only" a competent outfielder, but a competent outfielder who costs a couple hundred thousand is a pretty valuable asset. I realize that Zito could really help us in the post season this year, but I want more than one championship. I want a whole lot of championships in short succession, and I think the way to do that is to hold on to our promising youngsters and use our financial edge to snap up other team's promising youngsters once they hit free agency.

Elster88 Jul 28 2006 10:24 AM

I'll trade Heilman for Zito straight up.

MFS62 Jul 28 2006 10:27 AM

Elster88 wrote: I'll trade Heilman for Zito straight up. Where do we sign for that? I'll take it. Later

metsmarathon Jul 28 2006 03:46 PM

SteveJRogers wrote: Why not finally land someone long rumored to eventually be here remember matt lawton?

Rockin' Doc Jul 28 2006 04:39 PM

I voted no in the other poll where there is no contract extension in place for Zito. In this poll, I voted yes under the assumption that a 3 year contract extension was in place for the deal to go through. Without the extension, it's not worth doing, but with him locked up for a few years we should have a solid lefty starter to help anchor the rotation for several more years.

Zvon Jul 28 2006 06:52 PM

Only one person Id move Milledge for as far as pitching goes. Willis.

metirish Aug 14 2006 02:32 PM

I am still not one bit impressed with Milledge.

Yancy Street Gang Aug 14 2006 02:34 PM

Well, no, he hasn't been impressive at all. But he's also still too young to give up on. I'd deal him if we were getting solid youngish talent back, but not for a two-month rental.

Elster88 Aug 14 2006 02:41 PM

Yup. I would've been a very happy man if we had traded him and gotten back Oswalt. But not for Zito.

Johnny Dickshot Aug 14 2006 02:45 PM

He's gonna hit. Maybe not now, but sometime.

metirish Aug 14 2006 02:52 PM

] His play in the field is getting better Not.

seawolf17 Aug 14 2006 03:17 PM

metirish wrote: ] His play in the field is getting better Not. It's getting better in the way that "the guy who bought the team's" fielding is getting better in those lottery commercials.

Johnny Dickshot Aug 14 2006 03:19 PM

metirish wrote: ] His play in the field is getting better Not. Jeez.