Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Pitch counts

Yancy Street Gang
Aug 29 2006 09:36 AM

I know that there's debate over whether or not too much emphasis is being placed on pitch counts these days, but like it or not it's now a part of the game, and probably will be for years to come.

I've had a problem getting a handle on what's a high pitch count at different points in the game. I know that if a pitcher has thrown 110 pitches, he's probably not going to be in the game much longer. But how many pitches is "a lot" after four innings? Or after six? And if a pitcher throws 35 pitches in the second inning, how quickly does he have to get through the subsequent innings to be back at a normal pace?

In Monday afternoon's IGT, I raised a question about the average number of pitches that a batter sees in a plate appearance. Seawolf (I think) directed me to ESPN's expanded stat page. I did some pasting into Excel, and came up with a few numbers. They're current through (I assume) the end of Sunday's games, and only apply to the 2006 season. It's a pretty big sample size, though, and should be enough to let us get a handle on modern day pitch counts. (I wonder, though, how different the results might be for 1980, or 1960, or 1940.)

Anyway, here's what I found.

Through Sunday, 569,729 pitches had been thrown in the major leagues.

This covered 151,164 plate appearances.

Therefore, the average hitter sees 3.77 pitches per plate appearance.

The average number of pitches thrown in an inning is 16.39. Doing a little math, the average number of plate appearences in an inning is 4.35

So if a pitcher throws 35 pitches in his first inning, for example, but then throws only 8 in each of the next two innings, he'll be back on a normal pace.

Given the average number of pitches per inning, an "average" complete game would involve about 147 pitches, which is probably why we see so few of them. To get a complete game, a pitcher has to keep his average number of pitches per inning at around 13 or fewer. Much more than that and he won't be allowed to finish the game.

I also filtered out the Mets pitchers, based on the team that ESPN listed them on. It seems that they're listing all pitches thrown by the player for the season, so we'll see the innings that Oliver Perez pitched for Pittsburgh, and Orlando Hernandez for Arizona. For some reason Jorge Julio is still listed as a Met, so we're seeing his Arizona innings as well. So these Mets totals aren't really exclusive to the Mets, but it will give us a general idea of the numbers that our guys have put up.

NamePitchesP/PAP/IP
Tom Glavine26903.8916.7
Steve Trachsel23733.8016.9
Orlando Hernandez23264.1017.8
Pedro Martinez18973.8415.5
Oliver Perez15614.0319.3
Aaron Heilman12173.9816.6
Jorge Julio10794.3018.7
Billy Wagner10324.2017.1
Darren Oliver10243.8215.4
John Maine10234.1816.6
Roberto Hernandez9644.0818.4
Duaner Sanchez8523.7215.4
Pedro Feliciano8193.7215.9
Alay Soler7893.7917.5
Chad Bradford7093.5614.4
Brian Bannister5983.9617.6
Heath Bell4373.8717.3
Mike Pelfrey3793.8317.8
Jose Lima3674.0321.2
Victor Zambrano3663.7717.2
Henry Owens894.6822.3
Royce Ring673.7216.8
Bartolome Fortunato613.3920.3

Edgy DC
Aug 29 2006 09:42 AM

I always aim at keeping things under 15 pitches per inning. And consequently, root for my team to drive the opposing pitcher over 15. If my team goes in order in the first, but it took the other pitcher 19 pitches to do it, I'm kind of cheery.

Yancy Street Gang
Aug 29 2006 09:43 AM

And if a batter fouls off a bunch of pitches and ends up with a 12-pitch at bat, he's pretty much used up the pitcher's allotment for the entire inning.

Edgy DC
Aug 29 2006 09:47 AM

So, Bradford throws the fewest pitches/inning, and likely pitches the fewest innings per outing. His motion is easier on the arm, but tougher on the back. If he can stave off back trouble, he might pitch until he's 50. As long as he can, you know, stay effective.