Master Index of Archived Threads
No More Tides?
Farmer Ted Sep 08 2006 08:38 AM |
From today's NYDN..
|
Yancy Street Gang Sep 08 2006 08:49 AM |
Tides Deathwatch thread.
|
Farmer Ted Sep 08 2006 09:51 AM |
I was in Scranton recently (no, not a Dundler Mifflin meeting) and the papers were reporting that the team may be up for sale, just like the Tides' situation. The local government controls the stadium and has some weird oversight over the mangement group. It's a Phillies/Yankees area. It would be close to NYC but I'm not sure the fans would take. Newark perhaps?
|
Edgy DC Sep 08 2006 10:11 AM |
The Tides said bye and they're moving on
|
seawolf17 Sep 08 2006 11:07 AM |
|
Let's buy them! We can rename them the Cranepools. Kase, start a fund.
|
MFS62 Sep 08 2006 11:08 AM |
|
Time and the Tides must wait a few weeks.
Later
|
Willets Point Sep 08 2006 11:13 AM |
What did I say? We've got to watch out for those Nationals or Orioles snagging Norfolk.
|
Yancy Street Gang Sep 08 2006 11:14 AM |
How long have the Yankees been in Columbus? Can it be since they had to give up Kansas City when the Athletics moved there from Philadelphia?
|
Edgy DC Sep 08 2006 11:15 AM |
If you ask Bill James, Kansas City was a Yankee farm club long after the A's moved there.
|
Yancy Street Gang Sep 08 2006 11:17 AM |
I just pulled my 1971 Sporting News Baseball Guide off the shelf, and according to that, in 1970 the Pirates were in Columbus and the Yankees were in Syracuse.
|
Yancy Street Gang Sep 08 2006 11:18 AM |
And in 1965 the Yankees were in Toledo and the Mets were in Buffalo.
|
MFS62 Sep 08 2006 11:23 AM |
And in 1962, the Mets were in Syracuse.
|
Yancy Street Gang Sep 08 2006 11:36 AM |
In 1968 the Mets were in Jacksonville.
|
MFS62 Sep 08 2006 11:40 AM |
|
Was that the same time their AA (Texas League) team was in Jackson (Mississippi)? Later
|
Johnny Dickshot Sep 08 2006 11:41 AM |
The problem with doing that is pre-65 ? teams were only affiliated with parents and not controlled by them. The young Mets would scatter their guys all over the place, where they'd play alongside their future opponents.
|
MFS62 Sep 08 2006 12:10 PM |
|
Interesting. That got me thinking. (I hate it when that happens) Branch Rickey is credited with coming up with the idea of the "farm system" in which major league teams had direct control over the coaching/ development of their minor league players. IIRC, that was in the 40's when he was with Brooklyn. 1965 would have been about the time the "bonus baby" rule, under which any team could sign any amateur player, was phased out and the common draft was coming in. It makes sense that now that teams were spending large amounts of money on young players, they would want to make sure those players would receive a consistent level of coaching. And the way to do that was to have direct control of the farm teams and assign their players, and coaches, there. I do remember now that in my 1962-63 issues of the Sporting News Baseball Guide, there were sometimes more than one major league team affiliated with some minor league teams. Later
|
Johnny Dickshot Sep 08 2006 12:34 PM |
Yup. And in the early years the Mets didn't have enough depth in the organization to staff entire teams and so shared Syracuse, I think it was, with the Senators for at least one year.
|
seawolf17 Sep 08 2006 02:24 PM |
|
It was the 30s, when he was in St. Louis. One of those teams was the Rochester Red Wings.
|