Master Index of Archived Threads
Congratulations Cardinals
Johnny Dickshot Oct 20 2006 12:17 AM |
Got a lotta clutch hits from scrubs like Molina and Spiezio and Taguchi.
|
Nymr83 Oct 20 2006 12:18 AM |
go Tigers.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 20 2006 12:19 AM |
I can't root for the AL.
|
metirish Oct 20 2006 12:19 AM |
Go Tigers....
|
Edgy DC Oct 20 2006 12:20 AM |
Congratulatons, Cardinalia.
|
metsmarathon Oct 20 2006 12:22 AM |
now, see, i believe in rooting for the team that beat you. that way you're less separated from the glow of victory.
|
metsmarathon Oct 20 2006 12:23 AM |
|
but, um, take less time, please.
|
vtmet Oct 20 2006 12:24 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Oct 20 2006 12:26 AM |
I'm pulling a Pujols on this one, I can't congratulate the Cards...so many missed opportunities by the Mets...guys on base, either don't move 'em up or strikeout/lousy swings on good counts...and at the same token, how many times did we start batters off with a ball, or toy around with 0-2 and 1-2 counts only to lose the batters on less than good pitches in "pitcher's" counts...I don't think that guys like Suppan/Wainwright/Weaver/Flores outpitched us, we just didn't hit "hittable" pitchers...can't anyone hit a curveball, slider or changeup?
|
Johnny Dickshot Oct 20 2006 12:24 AM |
I only want good games, the better team to prevail, and an excuse to post the post the photo.
|
Willets Point Oct 20 2006 12:25 AM |
Congrats Cards, especially Suppan, that's a couple of pitching performances for the ages.
|
metsmarathon Oct 20 2006 12:29 AM |
blah blah blah, compelling story blah blah.
|
Zvon Oct 20 2006 12:31 AM |
Im a good sport and all but I wont go as far as to make a post in this thread.
|
Willets Point Oct 20 2006 12:33 AM |
|
Yeah, that shit's driving me crazy too.
|
Rockin' Doc Oct 20 2006 12:40 AM |
Congratulations to the Cardinals on winning the national League Pennant.
|
Willets Point Oct 20 2006 01:24 AM |
Weird fact. In the total number of pennants by franchise the Cardinals (17) have only just passed the Cubs (16).
|
Valadius Oct 20 2006 01:28 AM |
Yeah, but 6 of the Cubbies' pennants were won in the 1870's and 1880's.
|
Willets Point Oct 20 2006 01:31 AM |
That's my point. The Cards have only just now gone ahead despite the Cubs being in a pennant drought for the past 61 years.
|
Zvon Oct 20 2006 01:35 AM |
|
That is pretty wack.
|
MFS62 Oct 20 2006 07:37 AM |
On the Today show this morning, when talking about who would win the World Series, he said:
|
sharpie Oct 20 2006 09:00 AM |
|
who is "he"?
|
Mr. Zero Oct 20 2006 09:18 AM |
I also agree with the "root for the guys who beat ya'" theory—in theory. But, I've got to go with the Tigers this year, they're the charmed team. Plus, I'm hot for that blackletter "D".
|
HahnSolo Oct 20 2006 09:26 AM |
Hmmm. The team that eliminated the Yankees vs. the team that eliminated the Mets. Easy choice for me.
|
Rotblatt Oct 20 2006 09:34 AM |
I'm rooting for the Cardinals. I'm sick and tired of this "the AL is better" bullshit.
|
MFS62 Oct 20 2006 09:36 AM |
||
Oops, Matt Lauer. Later
|
Yancy Street Gang Oct 20 2006 09:56 AM |
I never subscribed to root for the team that beats you. A Cardinal victory won't reflect any glory on the Mets.
|
Vic Sage Oct 20 2006 10:30 AM |
fuck the st. louis cardinals... and while i'm at it, fuck the arizona cardinals, fuck the actual birds, and fuck the actual clergymen (before they fuck your sons).
|
Johnny Dickshot Oct 20 2006 10:49 AM |
Fuck the Jets
|
Vic Sage Oct 20 2006 10:53 AM |
yeah, your right.
|
cleonjones11 Oct 20 2006 10:56 AM |
Baseball season is over. I'm waiting for Dr. House and Standoff to resume.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 20 2006 09:49 PM |
|
Apparantly you don't subscribe to the MFY fans and media rationale that glorified the fact that execpt for last season, every World Champion was either the Yankees or had to go through the Yanks to get to the championship since 1998 (and the 97 Indians even beat the Yanks on their way TO the series) All mocking of MFY hubris aside, that is a pretty neat bit of trivita though I've been an NL fan all my life, and actually have rooted for the NL pennant winner every year, even 1985 and 1988 (begrudgingly in 88)
|
Yancy Street Gang Oct 21 2006 09:56 AM |
I guess I don't subscribe to Yankee-fan rationale.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 21 2006 11:06 AM |
Well except for 1999 you can say the same about the Mets for every postseason they've been in, either winning or losing to the eventual champion in one way or another.
|
holychicken Oct 21 2006 07:07 PM |
GOOO Cardinals! I am sick of all those AL fans who act like the NL is AAAA and that it is a foregone conclusion that whoever was to win the AL this year would also be WS champs. That and the DH sucks.
|
metsmarathon Oct 21 2006 10:03 PM |
good point! a root for the tigers is a root for the DH! boo, DH!
|
Elster88 Oct 22 2006 09:49 AM |
||
Just stop talking about the Yankees. Just don't do it.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 01:51 PM |
||
Okay, but its still is a feather for the cap though. "Hey, we got beat by the World Champs." Would it be better if I used the Knicks of 1984 who gave the champion Celtics their toughest fight before the finals against the Lakers, or the Golden Years Knick era (69-74)who did win or bow out to the eventual champs 5 out of 6 years? The point shouldn't be that I brought up the recent run by the AL New York baseball team, its the whole "We got beat by the eventual champs or we WERE the champs X out of X years" notion that at least says you got a shot at the brass ring and either got it or lost to the guys that would eventually get it. And if that is done on a consistant basis through a good time span, then I'd say that qualifies as a successfull run.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 02:00 PM |
Give you another example, from College Hoops, don't you think that if your team gave a team all they could handle before bowing out, especially in the first round, that you would continue to root for that team in the tourny?
|
Iubitul Oct 22 2006 06:41 PM |
|||
The last time I looked, style points are like crying when it comes to baseball
|
Elster88 Oct 22 2006 06:46 PM |
All your babbling is for nothing Steve. No one cares about crap like that except Yankee fans and, apparently, yourself.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 08:10 PM |
So to sum up we would not want to be like the Buffalo Bills and get to 4 Super Bowls and lose all four, or the Boys of Summer Dodgers and only win the 1 out of 6 Series apperances from 47-56 or the Braves of recent vintage with 1 World Series out of 14 straight trips to the postseason.
|
Yancy Street Gang Oct 22 2006 08:24 PM |
If the Mets lose the next four World Series, it would still be a better stretch than the last four years have been.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 08:44 PM |
|
Trying to explain the rationale about how its a good thing to lose to the eventual champion than not, especially if you do so in a hard fought series
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 09:02 PM |
The rationale it seems from you and Elster is that it makes no difference how the season ends. We could have lost to the Dodgers and watched THEM get smoked by the Cardinals, or we could have lost down the stretch of the season and the Philles (or whomever) could have been smoked in the first round. Or we could be beat by the eventual Champs, and there is no difference.
|
cooby Oct 22 2006 09:11 PM |
Go Tigers.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 09:28 PM |
Besides wouldn't you rather NOT hear "Hey, Da Championship still hadda go through Da Bronx this year!" type statements all winter ala 2001-2004?
|
metirish Oct 22 2006 09:36 PM |
|
I don't know if people will be saying that Steve, if the tigers win or lose one of the great memories I will have of this postseason is of Rogers brilliant outing against the yankees,to these eyes it was one of the great pitching performences I ever saw,maybe the best...full of emotion and knowing what that had to mean to Kenny and all that.
|
Elster88 Oct 22 2006 10:05 PM |
|
I don't think anyone cares.
|
Yancy Street Gang Oct 22 2006 10:09 PM |
|
I wanted the Mets to go as deep into the postseason as they could. They made it 7 games into the NLCS. I would have preferred a World Championshp, but I'm glad the Mets didn't have the kind of postseason the Yankees or Dodgers did, with a quick exit.
So what you're saying doesn't make a drop of sense.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 22 2006 11:04 PM |
||
We're still beating you on the 18th. And when we do, (or if we play a very tight game and lose at the end) and if you win the National Championship (you went to UCONN right?) wouldn't it stand to reason Fairfield fans across the...ummm North East... will take some comfort in being able to compete with the eventual National Champs? Course thats regular season and all, and not the tourny But say you lost to Duke in the Final Four round in a close, tight game, and Duke won the National Championship, wouldn't you have a sense of "Yeah, we gave the Champs all they could handle, the title had to go through US! Damn, if only this, this and this happened, we could be the National Champs." And if Duke got creamed in the Championship game the feeling would be "Ah we'd probably get beat anyway, wasn't our year."
|