="iramets"]="SteveJRogers"]1962-1966, thats all or parts of 4 seasons my friend. Stengel and Hodges were both inducted if you see the ballot post.
]
Yes, [Larry David tone of voice here] my friend [/Larry David tone of voice here], but Stengel managed for fewer than four seasons and your rule above just says "four seasons," not "any part of four seasons." So you've either broken your own rule by inducting Stengel, or your rule is incorrectly written. |
Thats fair.
|
HahnSolo Nov 25 2006 01:25 PM
|
It also applies to Dykstra and McDowell. Neither of them played five full seasons as a Met. Same goes for Aguilera.
|
SteveJRogers Nov 26 2006 10:20 AM
|
BTW Ira, 4th time I've done this and NO ONE bothered to pick up on the grammar errors. Thanks
Geez, I should think about some copy editing courses at Iona...
Later
|
KC Nov 26 2006 12:18 PM
|
You'd think after four times it wouldn't give a person a headache to read it. I mean really, how many people got through this whole post without wanting to bang their heads on the keyboard? I'm not picking on you, but you're big on this, "I'm an internet legend" and you're a "Quiet Leader" on mofo, and when someone questions your grammar (correctly, I might add) you're of- fended and you're pointing to the fact that it's well received on other venues or was it really met with indifference because ... no one cares?
What's the fascination with the Mets HOF anyways? There's a list of guys who are pretty much deserving and they get a bust in The Diamondclub lobby that in no way really resembles them (cheapass Mets can get good artists?), and maybe there's one or two who you could make a case for aren't in or are that maybe don't belong. Again, who cares?
Note: The preceding post may contain errors in grammar, spelling, and reason. Any resemblance to a post that is clear, well thought out, or even warranted is pure coincidence.
|
SteveJRogers Nov 26 2006 12:57 PM
|
"Quiet Leader" is the default level designation for someone with whatever number of posts (I think it starts in the 700 range) I have over there, not a custom designation.
]when someone questions your grammar (correctly, I might add) you're of- fended and you're pointing to the fact that it's well received on other venues or was it really met with indifference because ... no one cares? |
Actually I'm thanking Ira for finally saying "Hey moron, you have some errors in this document!" I didn't mean to sound offended, and I'm glad someone took the oppertunity to point it out. Lord knows it appeared that I needed it back in 99 or whenever I wrote the original. Maybe next year I'll just scrap the entire thing and start over with a different way of organizing it.
|
KC Nov 26 2006 01:50 PM
|
Ok, got ya. No teflon ... just indifference. Either way, or both, I'm prolly right.
I incorrectly assumed you were offended if what you say is the case. I thought you were being sarcastic.
|
SteveJRogers Nov 26 2006 03:32 PM
|
="KC"] What's the fascination with the Mets HOF anyways? There's a list of guys who are pretty much deserving and they get a bust in The Diamondclub lobby that in no way really resembles them (cheapass Mets can get good artists?), and maybe there's one or two who you could make a case for aren't in or are that maybe don't belong. Again, who cares?
|
Heh! I don't know. I was facinated by the fact that the Reds Listserv off of Miami of Ohio's listserver has a pretty well received one and at the time I had a website thing up so I figured "why not?"
They actually do have a screening process first, weeding out the Bernie Carbos and Kurt Stillwells of the world, but for whatever reason I didn't think A) the Mets had enough of a history that would neccsitate such a process, only 40 plus years and B) There wouldn't be as much support anyway a second time around after the first process.
Maybe I'll re-think the whole thing next year and do it that way, and come up with a different year range as well as I've always seen the 5 years as the time frame for any team oriented thing, maybe its just me as it's half the time of the guidlines on the actual baseball HOF ballot and generally most players of note tend to stay 5 years with a club.
|
iramets Nov 26 2006 04:25 PM
|
SteveJRogers wrote: I was facinated by the fact that the Reds Listserv off of Miami of Ohio's listserver has a pretty well received one and at the time I had a website thing up so I figured "why not?. |
Ya know, I bet Michael Richards thought firing off a few N-bombs during his act last week was a good move at the time. I mean, "Why not?"
You've got flaws upon flaws upon flaws here, Steve, the most basic of which is "Who needs a MET HOF voted on by anonymous Internet ninnies completely unaccountable for their stupid voting?" Then you've incorporated arbitrary nonsense, like requiring five years. You mean if Piazza came here in mid-1998, won five straight MVPs with the Mets while they won 5 straight championships, but had to retire after 4 1/2 glorious seasons, he should be ineligible? How about if a bunch of idiots decided that they wanted to see Joe McEwing elected to the Mets HOF, and voted all day, every day, and got their friends to create usernames to do the same? So you'd have a HOF with McEwing but without Piazza, all because you created a colossally dumb set of rules for your HOF, which no one needs anyway.
My advice? Do it right, or don't do it at all. And, with no unkindness intended, based on what you've shown here, I don't know if you're capable of doing it right.
|
Rockin' Doc Nov 26 2006 04:45 PM
|
SJR - "BTW Ira, 4th time I've done this and NO ONE bothered to pick up on the grammar errors."
That's because we're self righteous, know it all, elitist pricks and the people on the other boards aren't.
Actually, I didn't interpret Steve's response to iramets' critique of his grammar to be sarcastic. I took it to be more in the vain of, "I screwed up again".
|
SteveJRogers Nov 26 2006 05:01 PM
|
iramets wrote:
You've got flaws upon flaws upon flaws here, Steve, the most basic of which is "Who needs a MET HOF voted on by anonymous Internet ninnies completely unaccountable for their stupid voting?" Then you've incorporated arbitrary nonsense, like requiring five years. You mean if Piazza came here in mid-1998, won five straight MVPs with the Mets while they won 5 straight championships, but had to retire after 4 1/2 glorious seasons, he should be ineligible? |
Rewording it to "Parts of Five Seasons" would help in that particular regard.
A better argument would be that the 5 seasons rule makes the Robin Venturas and John Oleruds of the world ineligible despite great production and moments (Grand Slam Single) while Bruce Boisclair, Ron Gardenhire and Rey Ordonez are on the ballot based on being with the team for parts of 5 seasons
]How about if a bunch of idiots decided that they wanted to see Joe McEwing elected to the Mets HOF, and voted all day, every day, and got their friends to create usernames to do the same? So you'd have a HOF with McEwing but without Piazza, all because you created a colossally dumb set of rules for your HOF, which no one needs anyway.
|
Which is why I said "email" me the votes and it worked fine in the past. Tom Seaver, Gary Carter, Keith Hernandez, Mookie Wilson, Casey Stengel, Dave Johnson, Bob Murphy and Ralph Kiner all got in the first year I did this (on the Met Listserv at AOL and the original MOFO in 1999) Hernandez was named on all 30 emails sent to me that winter. Seaver on all but 1, Carter, Wilson and Koosman were the others with 20 or more votes.
No real crazy things in that balloting either, Cleon, McGraw, Staub, Grote, Agee, Buddy, Dykstra, Ryan, Kranepool, Sid, Darling, Maz, McDowell, Backman, Ojeda were the rest of the order with Brooks, Garrett, 'Dac, Kingman, Lynch, Matlack, Magadan, McReynolds, Teufel, Stearns, Swug and Millan receiving 1 vote each.
I think people sending me emails ala the Baseball Writers prevents something like Billy Wynne climbing the ranks of the UMDB's Top Popular Met List. Plus I would be able to see irregularities that go beyond someone giving a vote to their favorite player because they don't think he'd get enough votes anyway (ala the wise guys at the BBWAA who give a vote to a person on the HOF ballot because he was a nice guy or he knew the writer in college or something, or maybe they feel any award winner deserves a vote or whatever)
So now you are saying something is flawed in the BBWAA process? I see your point with the Rick Ferrell induction by the Vets (Ferrell was in poor health and a friend asked everyone to vote for him thinking no onelse would and lo and behold Ferrell got in)
Okay, give me some suggestions then for a better process?
|
iramets Nov 26 2006 05:43 PM
|
Well, I'd start with making someone other than you the vote-counter.
That's not a dig at your ability, btw. You need accountability in any voting process, and "Trust me, I'll be fair" isn't going to cut it.
Then I'd have "internet voting" being only one constituency among many, all of which would need to agree on a candidate to be put on the ballot. This may seem to complicate things, which it does at first, but it also allows you to eliminate a lot of other stupid rules (like "x years in a met uniform," which has more problems than I've hinted at here.) Possible "other" constituencies might be "Met Bloggers," who although they're anonymous need to maintain ther reputations as authorities. Maybe I'd have another group of "Mets historians," like the guys here who run "Mets By the Numbers" and "the UMDB" and like that. If all six or seven of these constituencies agree on a group of candidates, then they're Mets HOFers whatever length of service they have, and there's no point in flooding the internet voting with absurd crap because it's only going to influence that one group, so the qualilty of internet voting will improve as well.
That's just for starters.
|
SteveJRogers Nov 26 2006 05:54 PM
|
Would you like to help then?
Figuring now I should just hit the reset button on this project.
|
Rockin' Doc Nov 26 2006 06:07 PM
|
All hail the sacred Seaver post.
|
Rockin' Doc Nov 26 2006 06:12 PM
|
iramets, I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but both UMDB and MBTN sites are created and run by members of the CPF. The UMDB is the work of Yancey Street Gang while Mets by the Numbers is done by Johhny Dickshot.
|
ScarletKnight41 Nov 26 2006 06:22 PM
|
|
Elster88 Nov 27 2006 07:51 PM
|
HAIL
|
|
|