Master Index of Archived Threads
David Wright: He's a Swell One, You Betcha
Johnny Dickshot Feb 15 2007 05:08 AM |
He wants the fans to choose this year's at-bat song.
|
Willets Point Feb 15 2007 07:08 AM |
Well, he's not saying he'll use it.
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 07:31 AM |
You got to cool it now
|
TheOldMole Feb 15 2007 08:05 AM |
Is anyone using "The Boy From New York City"?
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 08:16 AM |
I'd ask myself, "What would Paul Shaffer do?" and go with a play on his name.
|
Farmer Ted Feb 15 2007 08:34 AM |
He's become TOO interactive. Catch the ball, throw the ball, hit the ball. Sign some autographs in between, please.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 08:35 AM |
He's a Cal Ripken for the 21st Century.
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 08:37 AM |
Fine, but if you say it again, it's clobbering time.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 08:46 AM |
At least the part about the 21st Century is a new twist.
|
Johnny Dickshot Feb 15 2007 09:31 AM |
It's not just that he's too interactive, or even Cal Ripken-like, but I fear he's scarily soul-less.
|
HahnSolo Feb 15 2007 09:32 AM |
He should honor his good buddy Cliff by playing the Sanford and Son theme every time he comes to the plate.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 09:36 AM |
|
This reminds me of the whole Jaerock Seo thing. Wright must be teflon-coated if endorsing a feces-drinker doesn't stick any taint to him.
|
Johnny Dickshot Feb 15 2007 10:04 AM |
Does it seem to have had any effect?
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 10:42 AM |
Yes, you are. But I can see where you're coming from.
|
seawolf17 Feb 15 2007 11:07 AM |
Sometimes I think Steve J is right when he compares Wright to a certain other player we all know, and it bothers me.
|
KC Feb 15 2007 11:09 AM |
Who's that?
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 11:12 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 15 2007 11:21 AM |
He was raised well and wants to avail himself to people. Nothing wrong with that. What's wrong is (1) when that allows him to be taken advantage of (and hopefully he'll get the message after a couple of Jaerock Lees) and (2) when he becomes so sycophantic that he's destroyed himself --- become a blank. Blanks can lose their competitive edge, also, performing to maintain their rep, rather than to advance their marker. Or their team's.
|
KC Feb 15 2007 11:15 AM |
I don't care what he does during the off-season, but I'd like to see him cool
|
Willets Point Feb 15 2007 11:15 AM |
I don't think he's a blank. Doing something like having the fans vote on his song seems kind of fun for some fans, albeit not my thing. I think the more celebrity-conscious athletes would actually shy away from doing something like this or anything that has a sense of real interaction with fans.
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 11:20 AM |
I don't think he's a blank, either.
|
metirish Feb 15 2007 11:42 AM |
|
Jeter.....I assume.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 15 2007 12:17 PM |
Yup (c)
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 12:20 PM |
I was thinking he meant Alex Rodriguez.
|
metirish Feb 15 2007 12:24 PM |
And the myth that is Jeter continues...
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 12:28 PM |
|
What the hell does that mean? I've got to disengage my imagination at this moment.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 12:29 PM |
Date actresses and supermodels, I assume.
|
Johnny Dickshot Feb 15 2007 12:31 PM |
Yes yes and yes.
|
KC Feb 15 2007 12:32 PM |
I assumed it was Jeter but wanted to ask. I don't see it at all. Jeter to me is
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 15 2007 01:24 PM |
|
Actually, the question shouldn't be what would Paul Shaffer do, but what did Paul Shaffer do? Does anyone remember what song David Wright entered to during his appearance on Late Show with David Letterman?
|
seawolf17 Feb 15 2007 01:34 PM |
Yeah, good point. I just wonder if Wright will eventually engender the anti-NY animosity that Cap'n Intangibles gets? Hopefully not until he wins four rings as a Met, in which case I don't give a rat's ass how much non-NY animosity he gets.
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 01:55 PM |
||
Youtube probably remembers.
|
OlerudOwned Feb 15 2007 02:09 PM |
|
Willets Point Feb 15 2007 02:21 PM |
|
SteveJRogers Feb 15 2007 06:57 PM |
|
Carter also got away with it, well especially where he played, because he played like a grinder behind the plate and he was always playing through something True it does come with the territory of being a catcher and all, but still, he got the perception of being a "Gamer" Not to mention a little bloop single Carter had this one time in October of 1986
|
SteveJRogers Feb 15 2007 07:44 PM |
|
You know, why can't Wright be our "Normal" Yankee Captain Template? The Don Mattingly, Thurman Munson, Lou Gehrig, hell even Graig Nettles, Willie Randolph and Ron Guidry were all THAT Captain type. You know, that soft spoken but gruff leader in the clubhouse, or the guy everyone looks to in the sea of chaos and the guy you KNOW has his teamates back. Something lacking in Cap'n Intangibles, but what 5 of the aforementioned fellows did have. (Lou was way too icy to Babe, even more so than Thurman was to Reggie, hell, maybe THAT part of Lou's template Jeter IS following) Donnie Baseball WAS the King of New York, he DID commericals, but you know what, HE WASNT OUT ON THE FREAKING TOWN! He went home to his wife and kids every night. Oh sure he was everywhere, but he never let it affect what mattered most. HITTING and playing baseball and being on a winning team. THATS what a superstar in this town SHOULD be. Notice also that the MFY decline actually ALSO coincided with Mattingly's back problems? Hmmm. Oh sure the pitching was pure crap and the managers in-and-out sure didn't help, but an 84-88 Mattingly on the 90-92 Yankees? Maybe they wouldn't have enough to hang with the Bluejays, but they wouldn't be as hiddeous as they were. Mattingly also doesn't have that anti-ness that Jeter has, that I am worried about Wright having. No one has ever called into question Mattingly's man-hood, or even suggested that he puts alittle mustard for the TV cameras. THATS the star Wright SHOULD emulate. Not Jeter. Not Jeter, not the Tiger Woods/Michael Jordan post 80's athlete. Not this manby-pamby cookie cutter "rock-star" with the quotes that give just enough to say nothing but to make the reporter think you are giving them something. Woods is so bad at this, he's become a joke on a national radio show where they air "soundbites" that sound so automated that they came from a broken record: "The golf course looks good, my golf swing feels good, I like my chances." Thats pretty much par the course for the modern "celbrity-athlete" these days, ala Mr. Jeter. What truely does amaze me, is that the MFY fan that grew up loving Thurman, Mattingly, Nettles, Randolph, ect, hell even Mantle's fans should HATE a guy like Derek Sanderson Jeter with every freaking fiber of their being, but they don't, and not because they've drunken the Kool-Aid, but its because there isn't the Anti-Jeter on that Yankee team now. There are no more Paul O'Neills or Tino Martinez to glom the old Munson/Mattingly love, now they've pretty much tried to make a team of all Derek Jeters. Oh sure they've tried with Jason Giambi, Johnny Damon and Gary Sheffield, but Giambi and Damon "converted" and Sheffield was so much of a liability he had to be traded! If there ever comes a time in the next couple of years where a MFY comes up and is alot like a Munson/Mattingly type and actually challenges that jerkwad at shortstop's reign, I'd love to see the war in that locker room! In short, yeah I'm worried that Wright is going to be Jeter-esque. Hell Ripken had his share of detractors as well, especially the fights he had about moving back to third and the fact that the streak consumed everything about him. Can he just BE!
|
SteveJRogers Feb 15 2007 08:05 PM |
|
You know, the more I think about it, the better that old "24 and 1 Guy" cop-out by the Wilpons SHOULD be put in that "Best moves are the ones you DONT make" category. Despite all the BS about Boras saying all that garbarge was just a negotiation ploy (none of it materialized in Texas, or in New York) or any sort of conspiracy theory you want to use (Fred's partners backing out of buying out Nelson's share and no ARod means cheaper Mets, ect) can you IMAGINE how bad it would be if HE was a Met starting in 2001? It would probably be worse than it is with him as a Yankee because the image would be that he was brought in TO win, never mind that Hampton would have left anyway therefore leaving us with no viable ace (Leiter was never an ace lets be fair) and a closer who still was undependable in October. Saying nothing if we sent Reyes somewhere and he performed well while we got back, oh say Roberto Alomar circa 2002. The poor guy would have been crushed. Can you imagine if HE hit the famous first game back after 9-11 game homer instead of Piazza? Somehow he would have mucked it up with some comment afterwards that would come off sounding self-agrandizing. Ah hell, what IF he did nothing in terms of HRs and Piazza STILL hit that homer. This was still Piazza's city and this was still his team, ARod would have been considered an afterthought, or at least thought of as less than Mike Piazza. There is no doubt that if he actually did sign, much like Bobby Bonilla he'd be long gone after only a few years.
|
Edgy DC Feb 15 2007 08:26 PM |
Steve, you're too all over the place and hard to respond to here. Your argument is built on arguments.
|
SteveJRogers Feb 15 2007 08:38 PM |
Fine, Derek Jeter is Joe DiMaggio's personae with Mickey Mantle's and Don Mattingly's teflon popularity
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 16 2007 02:54 PM |
I was just reading this again:
|
Edgy DC Feb 19 2007 10:19 PM |
|
Joe DiMaggio has more than one persona? Everything all Wright with HoJo
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 22 2007 01:15 PM |
|
David obviously didn;t attract enough attention to himself thru the Daily News, so now he's whoring his identity to the broader audience of mlb.com.
|
OlerudOwned Mar 22 2007 02:03 PM |
Dammit David, people give you great songs like "Scenario", and you wind up with a list full of Panic! At The Disco and Lil John.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 22 2007 02:06 PM |
I think we should stuff the ballot box for "Brown Sugar."
|
metirish Mar 22 2007 02:11 PM |
Theme to the A-Team ?...sweet jesus....
|
Kid Carsey Mar 22 2007 03:08 PM |
You guys aren't gonna rest 'til Wright bangs a 16 year crack whore with 2/3's
|
OlerudOwned Mar 22 2007 03:13 PM |
|
|
iramets Mar 22 2007 03:14 PM |
|
Is this some kind of "Batman" thing? Is there a secret bat-cave under the GCP that I don't know about? Sounds spooky.
|
Kid Carsey Mar 22 2007 03:20 PM |
OO: >>>but Panic! At The Disco is fucking atrocious.<<<
|
Nymr83 Mar 22 2007 03:37 PM |
you're not missing anything.
|
G-Fafif Mar 22 2007 03:44 PM |
|
I'd be grateful if it weren't "The Baby Elephant Walk".
|
Farmer Ted Mar 26 2007 08:43 AM |
Just caught our lovely third sacker on an ESPN commercial.
|
Gwreck Mar 26 2007 11:54 AM |
To David's credit, there are a *lot* of good walk-up (remember, it's the first 10-20 seconds of the song that matter here, not the whole thing) songs on this list.
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 26 2007 01:05 PM |
I'm sure they can devise a formula to play each of those songs 3 or 4 times during the course of the year. That would accomplish Wright's goal of pleasing everyone.
|
Edgy DC Mar 26 2007 02:41 PM |
Monster. The Young Master : David Wright
|
Vic Sage Mar 26 2007 03:16 PM |
Wright could end up the best player in Mets history, before he's done. He seems to work hard and take the game seriously, but has fun with life.
|
Nymr83 Mar 26 2007 03:19 PM |
|
i got yelled at by the liberal pc police last time i used that word.
|
Vic Sage Mar 26 2007 03:20 PM |
What word? I didn't use any word...
|
Gwreck Mar 26 2007 03:32 PM |
1. You spelled it wrong, there are two Gs.
|
Vic Sage Mar 26 2007 03:46 PM Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Mar 26 2007 03:52 PM |
|
1. spelling it with one "g" is a perfectly acceptable spelling according to the American Heritage Dictionary, when referring to a bundle of sticks tied together... as, of course, i certainly was, since any bunch of woodenheads tied together by a hate on david wright could certainly be referred to by that term. 2. No, i don't think i want to reconsider using that word... or any word. I put alot of consideration into all the words i use, so 1 consideration is generally enough for me. And as for your beliefs, they are of absolutely no interest to me. Some people appreciate my sense of humor, others don't. Of course, if you found my joke personally offensive, then i'm sorry you chose to take offense. But feel free to stop speaking for others. 3. Yes, "politically correct" is an ideology-neutral term... there are, in fact, overzealous, humorless arbiters of appropriate conduct and speech on both ends of the spectrum. So whose... i mean, WHAT end do you emerge from?
|
SteveJRogers Mar 26 2007 03:47 PM |
|
Lets use Player A for a comparision Vic: Best player in his team's history? Nope, not even close, though on many, including the Mets, he would be. Probably will end up in the Top 10 though when all is said and done, heck he probably actually is in the top ten now. Works hard, check. Takes the game seriously, check. Has fun with life, definite check. Doesn't want to offend or say no, generally, not as bad as Wright is but he is everywhere and does speak in the same Jordan/Woods modern athlete way of saying nothing but making it seem like something. There are no photos of him drunk with a hooker (then again you never know with the types he has dated through the years) and there has been no suspicion of him juicing. Yet I'm describing one of the most hated individuals in sports today, someone who if he read the blogs and message boards of his team's most bitter rivals (and even those who aren't so bitter) he will find countless of slanderous statements, questions about his sexuality, venomous accuastions about his actions both on and off the field and worse of all people saying he is nothing but an overated bum. You know, I could also be talking about David Wright as well, but this is the fellow I am referring to: So if any Met fan thinks hating on David Wright is okay, just imagine the crap you give Derek Jeter, cause thats exactly the same stuff you are dishing out. BTW, yes that image is from the ONLY reason why he should be Derek Bleeping Jeter in Flushing, well that and other things he has done to the Mets during his career. If it's not the fact that he does that sort of thing in the big spot against your team, is there any reason to hate on him? To question his manhood? To consider him a souless piece of crap? Sure he comes off as a selfish prick, sure he hasn't won a damn thing since Tino, Paulie and Brosius left following the 2001 World Series, but is he any better on or off the field than David Wright?
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 26 2007 05:56 PM |
I'm just having a little fun with David's straightlacedness and eagerness to please.
|
Nymr83 Mar 26 2007 07:03 PM |
|
i don't disagree, but the "pc police" (the people who complain about word choice) on THIS board are of the liberal variety.
|