Master Index of Archived Threads
Strange Plays
Edgy DC Mar 06 2007 11:01 AM |
.
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 06 2007 11:05 AM |
That is a weird inning. Why lead off with Tug with Clendennon on the bench?
|
metirish Mar 06 2007 11:13 AM |
Tug was going to stay in the game to pitch the 10th?...very cool inning....
|
metirish Mar 06 2007 11:14 AM |
double post...
|
Edgy DC Mar 06 2007 11:17 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Mar 06 2007 11:31 AM |
I think convention then was, rather than trying to win the game now! you try to get the most innings out of your top relievers as you can. Tug had pitched one uneventful inning, and Hodges likely wanted at least two more.
|
iramets Mar 06 2007 11:28 AM |
Hmmm...I just perused this game on retrosheet, too. Baseball was different back in them days, youngun...
|
metirish Mar 06 2007 11:32 AM |
That's interesting about Mauch and the double-switch,so I did a little research....Mauch according to where I'm looking was "one of the first " to use the double-switch but this guy claims that Paul Richards was likely the first...
|
Edgy DC Mar 06 2007 11:36 AM |
Walter Alston lifting his catcher in trying to win while Hodges neither double-switched out Grote nor pinch-hit for Tugger kind of fits in perfectly with the old-skool "by-the-book" approach of playing for the win on the road and playing for the tie at home.
|
Edgy DC Mar 06 2007 01:16 PM |
|
While you're bouncing around Retrosheet, check out this uncharacteristic bit of editorializing. CARDINALS 6TH: Encarnacion grounded out (third to first);
|
Frayed Knot Mar 06 2007 01:44 PM |
Lots of weird stuff in that inning:
|
Edgy DC Mar 06 2007 01:49 PM |
McGraw, incidentally, batted .308 (4-13) with five RBI that year.
|