Master Index of Archived Threads
Jury Duty
Johnny Dickshot Mar 01 2007 10:47 PM |
Sat in a room reading Roger Angell all day waiting to be called.
|
cooby Mar 01 2007 10:53 PM |
I was on jury duty once too, we spent a day being selected and then a day or two later we had our trial (drunk driving, did she evade the officer?....it's up to you, folks)
|
Nymr83 Mar 01 2007 11:33 PM |
i got called once, told them i was a student and college was starting back up in less than a week, they let me leave.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 01 2007 11:43 PM |
I've never been called - which is odd seeing as I haven't moved in a while, usually vote and pay taxes and whatnot.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 01 2007 11:43 PM |
.
|
cooby Mar 02 2007 06:22 AM |
I know that a lot of people's first instinct is to try to get out of it, but I have never understood why. It's not a bad experience, and it's surely a break from the routine.
|
MFS62 Mar 02 2007 08:47 AM |
I was on a murder trial jury many years ago. It was in the Bronx. Two defendants. One guy happened to see the crime (involving his friend), and showed up just as the police arrived. Time doesn't permit describing the details of the case, but it was very interesting, from the relationship of the defendants, the victim and the key witness. Deliberation took a full day. We found one guilty and the friend not guilty. We probably would have found both not guilty, but from the way the Judge "read us the law", we had no other course.
|
sharpie Mar 02 2007 08:57 AM |
I was on a carjacking/carstripping jury about 10 years ago. The foreperson was an idiot and we ended up the first day of deliberations deadlocked on a bullshit case. I had to sort of take over the next day. We found the guy guilty on all counts but the biggest one.
|
RealityChuck Mar 02 2007 08:57 AM |
I was called twice.
|
Farmer Ted Mar 02 2007 08:59 AM |
Called twice to jury duty. First gig was a federal trial involving a wrongful death suit. Deliberated for about three hours and found for the defendant.
|
iramets Mar 02 2007 08:59 AM |
I served as the foreman of a grand larceny jury this year. We were stuck at 11-1 for a day and a half (I was the 1) and I finally caved.
|
Yancy Street Gang Mar 02 2007 09:01 AM |
Did you cave towards guilty or not guilty?
|
iramets Mar 02 2007 09:21 AM |
|
Guilty. We'd already agreed he was he was guilty on one burglary count, but I was holding out that he had committed "grand larceny" as well. Basically, the prosecution hadn't specifically shown receipts for the property we'd found him guilty of burgling (and his defense hadn't mentioned this as a reason we should find him not guilty of grand larceny) but the other 11 were saying that , absent those receipts, we couldn't know he had stolen more than $3000 worth of stuff. My argument was that 1) if the defense wasnt arguing that point, they were (perhaps stupidly) conceding that $3000 was not much to steal (from a jeweler's house) and 2) common sense dictates that the fairly wealthy victim probably had much more than 3000 dollars in his house--"Don't you all" I argued "have way more than 3000 dollars worth of stuff in your house ? If a burglar is ripping off your place right this second, won;t you think yourself lucky if he gets only 3000 worth of stuff?" But they weren't buying, and I wanted out of there,
|
soupcan Mar 02 2007 09:48 AM |
Agitator.
|
KC Mar 02 2007 10:03 AM |
I was impaneled on a rape case once, but wasn't chosen. I don't know how
|
Rockin' Doc Mar 02 2007 01:33 PM |
I was called once in the late 1980's. I had to sit around the courthouse for roughly 2 hours on Monday and then we were all allowed to leave. We were given a number that we had to call by 7:30 AM every day to get a recorded instructions for that day. On Tuesday and Wednesday, the recording said I would not be needed that day and to check in tomorrow. On Thursday morning, the recording informed me that I was released of my duty as a possible juror.
|
Nymr83 Mar 02 2007 02:59 PM |
New york eliminated most of the exemptions years ago, as did the feds, but is it possible that in your jurisdiction doctors are now exempt?
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 02 2007 04:00 PM |
They finally interviewed me this afternoon and subsequently declared me unfit to sit in judgement of whose fault this particular traffic accident on Ave. U was -- the town car or the other car -- and how much pain & $uffering the guilty driver is therefore responsible to pay the injured town car passenger.
|
metirish Mar 02 2007 04:14 PM |
I'm not sure but I know before I could not serve because I was not a citizen,filled out papers to send back to the local court house years ago,I think they changed that law now though and I can be called as a resident alien.
|
KC Mar 02 2007 05:05 PM |
I'm not creative in this sense, but imagine a pretty funny screenplay could
|
Nymr83 Mar 02 2007 05:56 PM |
|
irish is just dressing to fit in with the locals... JD- "$uffering" had me cracking up. we need tort reform, namely a cap on non-compensatory damages, pretty badly. ask any doctor in NY how high their malpractice insurance is thanmks to the threat of an insanely high pulled out of thin air number that a jury can think up
|