Master Index of Archived Threads
Meet Ben Johnson
Johnny Dickshot Mar 12 2007 11:32 AM |
NY Times is paonting this as a battle betyween Newhan and Johnson for the final reserve slot. I think tho that means a 7-man bullpen too.
|
Edgy DC Mar 12 2007 11:35 AM |
I enjoyed that article also.
|
metirish Mar 12 2007 11:48 AM |
If it's a battle between Johnson and Newhan then I am rooting for Ben,nothing against Newhan but Johnson would seem the better player and younger too.
|
Edgy DC Mar 12 2007 11:59 AM |
Johnson's option and Newhan's (modest) infield ability work against Ben.
|
iramets Mar 12 2007 12:00 PM Re: Meet Ben Johnson |
|
O, rare Ben Jo(h)nson
|
Farmer Ted Mar 12 2007 01:50 PM |
Mets.com lists Newhan as the #3 guy at five positions on its depth chart. That's one multi-faceted mofro.
|
Farmer Ted Mar 12 2007 01:51 PM |
Mets.com lists Newhan as the the #3 guy at five different positions. That's one multi-faceted mofro.
|
smg58 Mar 12 2007 02:25 PM |
I'd like to see them find a way to move or retire Franco so the decision becomes easy. Newhan has been playing pretty well too, actually, so I wouldn't sell him short either. Given all the uncertainties in the rotation, now is not the time to shrink the bullpen.
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 12 2007 03:04 PM |
I'm in favor of Franco's retiring too, that is, if they're convinced one of those other guys can be counted on to hit a single to right field when necessary.
|
Gwreck Mar 12 2007 03:44 PM |
I don't think Julio's second half made me exactly sure he can be counted on for that, either.
|
Johnny Dickshot Mar 12 2007 03:44 PM |
Today against the Nats, Johnson singles and scores on a double by Newhan. And Milledge -- who looks like a guy earning a job, is 3-4 with 2 RBI.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 12 2007 04:07 PM |
Mgmt obviously likes Franco, plus he apparently provides some measure of those good ol' intangibles to the bench. It's also not as easy as fans often suggest to simply move the guy to a coaching position. There's a finite number of uniformed coaches allowed so adding him would neccesitate subtracting someone else.
|
Nymr83 Mar 12 2007 04:15 PM |
|
or mgmt doesnt like admitting that a 2 year deal to a 46 year old wasnt the brightest move?
|
Edgy DC Mar 12 2007 04:16 PM |
Thing about the second half is that there was seemingly nothing wrong with his bat, but (1) his eye was off, and (2) he got a few bad calls and that seemed to aggravate (1).
|
Frayed Knot Mar 12 2007 04:26 PM |
|
I honestly don't think that's the problem. The money's not so much that they just can't eat the remainder and they made no secret about bringing him here as much for the "intangible factor" as for any unique baseball skills he still had. I just hope they recognize if/when the balance tilts to far to the one side.
|
metirish Mar 12 2007 04:31 PM |
Having Franco when you are running away with the division is fine but what happens if the Mets are in a tight race and Franco isn't doing his job and looks lost at the plate,would Omar cut him?,I like Franco and think he's probably a good fella to have on the bench so I hope he hits this year.
|
Nymr83 Mar 12 2007 04:32 PM |
I think the balance will already have tilted if the Mets have a better hitter who is kept off the roster because of him.
|
Yancy Street Gang Mar 12 2007 04:33 PM |
He wouldn't necessarily have to cut Franco. He could send him to
|
Nymr83 Mar 12 2007 04:37 PM |
can he be sent there without his permission?
|
metirish Mar 12 2007 04:39 PM |
That's the thing,I don't think Omar would just send him to AAA, maybe I'm wrong.
|
Yancy Street Gang Mar 12 2007 04:46 PM |
|
Maybe not. But he might agree to go if he's promised a September callup and he might prefer that to being cut loose. It's all very hypothetical at this point anyway. Hopefully Franco will be all that and a bag of chips for the next seven months and no such decisions will have to be made.
|