Master Index of Archived Threads
The Balk/no Balk
Frayed Knot Jul 20 2005 10:30 PM |
This was a new one on me, both for the "type" of balk it was and for the fact that is was: a) argued (supposedly not allowed) and then b) reversed.
|
KC Jul 20 2005 10:47 PM |
I was thinking the same thing after it was reversed and explained. If an "in-
|
Frayed Knot Jul 20 2005 11:09 PM |
There's a story I heard once -- not sure if it's true.
|
seawolf17 Jul 20 2005 11:23 PM |
I'd have to figure that if any ball headed towards home plate was intercepted by a batter, one of two things would happen: (a) if the ball was in play, then that's interference and at least the runner is out; (b) if it's a dead ball (like they're throwing it around the horn after a K, except they decide to include the catcher, but the next hitter runs up to the plate and whacks it), then... um... I just don't think that would happen.
|
Johnny Dickshot Jul 20 2005 11:56 PM |
I figured "balk" too, but when Cameron made an out and Reyes didn't score, I figured fate was telling us the umps made the right call after all. The ball never lies.
|