Master Index of Archived Threads
Robbed by Spectators
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 01:52 PM |
I've seen way too many plays in the last few weeks where a ball is driven down the line, and, as it bounces into the corner, I anticipate a play developing, perhaps a runner from first going for home, only to see the play called dead when a fan reaches over the railing, grabs the ball, and, almost inevitably, raises his* hands in triumph.
|
metirish Jul 25 2005 02:12 PM |
Yeah it nearly happened several times during Met games it seems lately, this fan interference especially hurts if it's the likes of Reyes that had the hit, you think triple when he hits one that rattles around the corner, I don't believe in punishment, the fans around him probably chastise him if they are not too hammered to know what's going on, the slow walk of shame brings to mind Steve Bartman and who needs that?
|
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 02:30 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jul 25 2005 02:50 PM |
Bartman, of course, didn't reach onto the field. And the TV crew had no business lingering the camera on him the way they did.
|
metirish Jul 25 2005 02:48 PM |
Yeah, my Bartman reference was to illustrate what can happen to a fan that gets blamed for a crucial call, as you pointed out the media(FOX) was to blame as much as anyone for that.
|
seawolf17 Jul 25 2005 02:54 PM |
Sounds fair to me, Edgy.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 25 2005 03:27 PM |
I want fans who purposely interfere with live batted balls to be tied to a chair underneath the stadium someplace while large security personnel take turns beating them for a length of time to be determined by the severity of the offense.
|
soupcan Jul 25 2005 04:00 PM |
|
Fan interference drives me crazy too.
For a t-shirt? At a Ducks game? Incredible.
|
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 04:07 PM |
As I've tried to say, I see the Bartman sin as a very different level of transgression.
|
TheOldMole Jul 25 2005 04:21 PM |
Edgy - Why does this strike you as in any way excessive?
|
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 04:26 PM Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Jul 25 2005 10:53 PM |
It strikes me that intentional humilation is a punishment that contemporary sensibilities don't stomache well.
|
seawolf17 Jul 25 2005 04:31 PM |
||
Yeah. The most disturbing thing that I've ever seen. Some three years later, my wife still has to hide her eyes every time they bring out the T-shirt gun (and on almost every foul pop that comes close to the edge of a tier). They only had one T-shirt gun, so all eyes in the park watched the shirt come out of the gun, loop into the air, and just past this guy's outstretched fingers. The guy reached out of the first luxury box on the third-base side and just tumbled right out, cartwheeling head-first on the railing separating sections 103 and 104 (our seats are in 105). Scary as hell. They helicoptered the guy out of there, but I don't know if he survived.
|
metirish Jul 25 2005 08:26 PM |
|
I probably should not have brought Bartman into this thread because what he did didn't meet the criteria you laid out , however your above post is so true, ESPN even did a show live from Harry Caray's Restaurant on the implosion of the "Bartman Ball".
|
soupcan Jul 25 2005 10:20 PM |
|
Bartman may very well have gotten jobbed but you know what? Too bad for him.
Indeed. Amen, brother.
|
Johnny Dickshot Jul 25 2005 10:42 PM |
|
That's how Maude Flanders went.
|
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 10:56 PM |
I think there were a half a dozen peeps going for the Bartman ball.
|
soupcan Jul 25 2005 10:58 PM |
So screw them too.
|
Edgy DC Jul 25 2005 11:08 PM |
Screw them, sure. But he kind of got the sins of many on the back of one.
|
soupcan Jul 25 2005 11:15 PM |
So he was the unlucky one who actually touched the ball, oh well sucks for him. If he wasn't trying to grab the ball he would never have been villified like he was.
|
Nymr83 Jul 26 2005 01:10 AM |
|
thats a bit extreme as who knows if they thought it was foul? what if its a kid? but i agree with #'s 1-5. at the very least you get the boot and dont keep the ball.
|