Master Index of Archived Threads


Met Count

Edgy DC Apr 05 2007 11:38 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Apr 05 2007 09:11 PM

#800 Moises Alou #801 Joe Smith #802 David Newhan #803 Scott Schoeneweis #804 Ambiorix Burgos #805 Aaron Sele

metsguyinmichigan Apr 05 2007 07:43 PM

Just curious. How do you count a Tim Foli type who had two tours with us? Does he count once, or twice like Gover Cleveland?

Frayed Knot Apr 05 2007 08:37 PM

Once. Cleveland was part of a one at a time succession, Foli wasn't.

SteveJRogers Apr 06 2007 02:28 PM

FWIW the 2007 Met media guide clocks the number at 797, yet they list all the names listed in Yancy's ATR page (which is used here! Not sure how that happened, maybe they need a good copy editior! Also, can't recall the name, or the year, there was one name that somehow got into the roster list and was removed the following year, I'll have to comb the books for it. I believe it was very early 1990's.

iramets Apr 06 2007 02:36 PM

I, for one, would be interested in an account of various steps and mis-steps Yancy had to take to get at such a precise head-count.

Johnny Dickshot Apr 06 2007 02:41 PM

What I think we as a forum should do is count up together in a fabulous 700-post thread. I'll go start it.

Benjamin Grimm Apr 06 2007 04:16 PM

iramets wrote: I, for one, would be interested in an account of various steps and mis-steps Yancy had to take to get at such a precise head-count. You know, I wish I had an interesting story to tell about that but I don't. I seem to remember very early on comparing lists with the future Johnny Dickshot. I might have had a few players for his list and he may have had a couple for mine, but we cross checked each other in the first month or two of both of our sites being live. The list of players has been complete pretty much from the very beginning.

Edgy DC May 01 2007 11:56 AM

#806!! Chan Ho Park!!

iramets May 01 2007 12:40 PM

Yancy Street Gang wrote: ="iramets"]I, for one, would be interested in an account of various steps and mis-steps Yancy had to take to get at such a precise head-count. You know, I wish I had an interesting story to tell about that but I don't. I seem to remember very early on comparing lists with the future Johnny Dickshot. I might have had a few players for his list and he may have had a couple for mine, but we cross checked each other in the first month or two of both of our sites being live. The list of players has been complete pretty much from the very beginning. JD's site has someone complaining that two Mets (Les Rohr and More Roar, I think) had been omitted from the headcount, though it's a bit unclear as to when that was corrected, etc. JD or Yancy, care to comment? I don't get what this guy was complaining about or if he had a valid complaint, how and when it got cleared up.

Johnny Dickshot May 01 2007 12:57 PM

Those guys appaarently were left off the all-time roster published in the Mets media guide.

Benjamin Grimm May 01 2007 01:06 PM

Park is 807, Gotay is 808. I'm not aware of the Les Rohr controversy. I used to get a lot of e-mails saying stuff like,"Why isn't my neighbor in your database? He told me he played for the Mets in 1974." The link I put on the roster page seems to have put a halt to those kinds of questions. I wonder now how many of those inquiries might have been for people who are now in the database as minor leaguers.

Gwreck May 01 2007 01:22 PM

Yancy Street Gang wrote: Park is 807, Gotay is 808. I was going to say. I think we missed Easley somewhere in there.

Edgy DC May 01 2007 01:29 PM

Sorry, I missed Easley. #806!! Damian Easley!! #807!! Chan Ho Park!! #808!! Ruben Gotay!!

Edgy DC May 05 2007 08:17 PM

Jorge Sosa!! #809!!

Frayed Knot May 06 2007 08:27 AM

]I used to get a lot of e-mails saying stuff like,"Why isn't my neighbor in your database? He told me he played for the Mets in 1974." The link I put on the roster page seems to have put a halt to those kinds of questions. I wonder now how many of those inquiries might have been for people who are now in the database as minor leaguers. Twice now in the last few years my nephew's Little League coach has told the parents that he was a former major league player - which prompts my sister to e-mail her baseball-savvy brothers wondering if they remember him. Except that both times the guy has failed both our memories and the Baseball-Reference test. We did dig up some minor league history and draft status on the last guy and it is possible that what he claimed was being in the StL Cardinal or Tex Ranger system not necc their MLB club and it was mis-understood. Either that or he's trying too hard to impress suburban moms figuring that no one will call him on it, who knows?

SteveJRogers May 06 2007 09:08 AM

One of my Dad's friends had his son (elementary school age) in a baseball instruction thing where the guy claimed to be a former Met and the father kept asking me if I heard of the guy, for some reason he never quite got the actual name; He thought it was some son of a famous ballplayer and for some reason either Roberto Clemente Jr or Eduardo Perez kept going in his mind. Well they never did find out exactly what the story was, (i.e what EXACTLY was his name so I could have said "Ahh, Norfolk Tides 1995-1996" or something) and for that the kid thinks the guy was a flat out lier rather than a guy just trying to buff up his resume to get more customers for his instructional camp thing.

iramets May 06 2007 09:20 AM

Never ceases to amaze me how readily humans will lie when they foolishly believe they cant get caught. I mean, we've got incredibly precise and exhaustive records going back well over a century, with researchers looking into this stuff with increasing scrutiny to bolster our already-exhaustive knowledge, and these bozos are making up shit that won't withstand a casual glance. It's like I told you guys that I was President of the U.S. between Carter and Reagan and confidently thinkng "Who the hell will check it out?--probably, there's no definitive record, anyway. Ha, ha." Talk about your resume-padding! "I once fantasized that I was a MLB player" = "I was a MLB player."

Frayed Knot May 06 2007 09:40 AM

There was a 'Monty Python' skit which was a game-show parody called 'Stake Your Claim'. In it the contestant had to stake his claim to something and see if it would stand up to scrutiny. So the first guy's claim is that he was the one to have actually written all of Shakespeare's works: "that's right, and me wife wrote all the sonnets" Emcee: "First question: How old are you Mr. Smith" Smith: "Forty-Three" Emcee: "Well these works are known to have been performed in the 17th century over three-hundred years before your birth, how could you have possibly done them then?" Smith: "Well ... that's where my claim falls to the ground. Y'see I was hoping you wouldn't bring up that particular point but now I can see you're more than a match for me" Emcee: "Our next contestant ... " Smith: "I was right"

Benjamin Grimm May 06 2007 05:00 PM

Lino Urdaneta is number 810. And Del Unser finally has some company: http://www.ultimatemets.com/roster.php#U

Edgy DC May 06 2007 05:19 PM

And his ERA has been lowered from to 81.00.

Benjamin Grimm May 17 2007 12:19 PM

Carlos Gomez is number 811 and Jason Vargas is number 812. (That's the area code for Southern Indiana, by the way.)

Edgy DC May 17 2007 01:14 PM

"Southern Indana" nickname for Vargas. And we can call Gomez "Police Non-Emergency."

Edgy DC May 29 2007 07:48 PM

Number 813!

cooby May 29 2007 07:55 PM

That's a nice picture. He looks happy to be here!

Willets Point May 30 2007 11:18 AM

It's not a very good picture of the Count though.

Benjamin Grimm May 30 2007 12:26 PM

How is it possible to photograph the Count, anyway?

Edgy DC May 30 2007 12:35 PM

Not all counts are vampires. Even those with Rumanian accents and live in castles with bats may not be. Fangs can happen!

metsguyinmichigan May 31 2007 01:42 PM

I read to day that the Blue Jays had their 500th player appear today. Toronto is 15 years younger than the Mets, yet they're only 313 players behind us.

Johnny Dickshot May 31 2007 01:58 PM

Yeah but we've had 559 players to their ~500 in our common history.

Frayed Knot May 31 2007 02:59 PM

When we were as old as the Jays are now - two months into season 21 - we had 466 different players (acc to GWreck's list). Or, to put it another way, our #500 didn't come until opening week of season 23 (April 1994)

Edgy DC Jul 08 2007 12:21 PM

Number 814! Kind of cool to send Williams out there with the guy who was catching him in New Orleans.

Edgy DC Jul 21 2007 04:08 PM

Number 815!

Edgy DC Aug 02 2007 11:48 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Aug 02 2007 11:59 AM

Number 816! Number 817! Number 818!

Willets Point Aug 02 2007 11:55 AM

This pic actually looks menacing.

Edgy DC Aug 02 2007 12:00 PM

I wanted a picutre of him in his castillo. Get it? The chin fuzz that was once forbidden from the Met clubhouse is now looking like the standard.

Edgy DC Aug 22 2007 09:23 PM

Number 819! Jeff Conine!

Edgy DC Sep 03 2007 02:18 PM

Boo. I had booted up Collazo.

Edgy DC Sep 05 2007 12:38 PM

Number 820! Willie Collazo!

Elster88 Sep 05 2007 03:38 PM

I have no memory of that muppet. Was it the Countess?

seawolf17 Sep 05 2007 05:55 PM

Most definitely.

Willets Point Sep 06 2007 06:28 AM

Looks like the Count in a wig. I suspect that the Count is gay.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2007 06:30 AM

I did once see a purple muppet hand underneath an airport bathroom stall.

metsguyinmichigan Sep 06 2007 08:29 AM

It's long been suspected that Ernie and Bert were a couple. And I don't think any of us would be surprised if Big Bird stepped out of the closet. Cookie Monster is way too butch.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2007 08:36 AM

What clinches it for me with Ernie and Bert is the matching monogrammed headboards on their beds, an E for Ernie and a B for Bert. Picture the two of them shopping for those headboards together. No heterosexual roommates would ever do that.

Johnny Dickshot Sep 06 2007 08:40 AM

Dick Shot Junior and I have watched a few eps of Sesame Street and I must say, it's gone completely to hell since I was crapping my pampers. This is mostly due to that irritating Elmo who gets half the show. I'd like to kill him.

metsguyinmichigan Sep 06 2007 08:46 AM

Yancy Street Gang wrote: What clinches it for me with Ernie and Bert is the matching monogrammed headboards on their beds, an E for Ernie and a B for Bert. Picture the two of them shopping for those headboards together. No heterosexual roommates would ever do that. OK, this started a whole discussion here in the newsroom, which is what happens when the editors go into the news meeting. Were Ernie and Bert adults? Were they kids? Brothers? If so, where were their parents? Could it be that they were just a couple metrosexual kids living in an apartment (with monogramed beds) without jobs but enough resources to collect paperclips and rubber ducks and slurp soda at Mr. Hooper's store? Oscar, we understand.

Willets Point Sep 06 2007 09:09 AM

Don't forget Bert's pigeons.

seawolf17 Sep 06 2007 09:19 AM

We've definitely rediscovered Sesame Street, and we have come to love Elmo as practically a member of the family. There's really a phenomenal amount of research that's gone into the character development (Elmo's three years old, Grover is six, Prairie Dawn is a precocious four-year-old, Baby Bear's lisp, etc.) and relationships (Telly & Baby Bear, Elmo & Zoe, Bert & Ernie, Baby Bear & Curly Bear, Elmo & Grover, etc.). You could do a fascinating PhD thesis on the whole structure; hell, you could write a whole encyclopedia, considering the show's history. They've structured the show a lot more now than they did when I was a kid; there's a pretty standard sequence of events (opening thematic skit, letter of the day, number of the day, Elmo's World, Trash Gordon), with bits and pieces scattered around. Even Elmo's World follows a very tight script (song, topic intro, musical topic interlude, Mr. Noodle, ask kids, ask a baby, counting, looking in the drawer, one kid's story, talking with a representative of the topic, Dorothy imagining Elmo doing something with the topic, ending song), most likely because kids thrive on routines. The first eight notes of the Elmo's World theme song are practically a national holiday in our house; all other activity immediately ceases. MiniWolf's not at a point yet where he demands his daily Elmo, but I'd bet that if he was older, he'd be confused if it didn't happen. FWIW, Sesame Street released a three-DVD "Old School" set recently, which is good for a laugh if you can find it at your local library. I don't know that I'd spend money on it, mostly because some of the characters are waaaay different than they are now (different Gordon, Oscar is orange, Big Bird's head is smaller), but also because the stories are dated (the whole story of the first episode is very timely for 1969, but would never happen today), and because, quite frankly, I have better things to do with my time than watch 35-year-old episodes of Sesame Street.

Willets Point Sep 06 2007 09:33 AM

Old School Sesame Street. Do they ever show anything this trippy anymore?

Johnny Dickshot Sep 06 2007 09:36 AM

Hate. Elmo. Irritating.

seawolf17 Sep 06 2007 09:40 AM

Give him a chance, JD. I know he's irritating, and he's been so overexposed in the media, but the kids really do dig him. Barney? Whole 'nother story. He's on right before SS in the morning, and my wife turns it on. THAT drives me nuts. Willets, they still do trippy stuff, but that specific bit doesn't run any more. Every once in a while, they'll slip in something old school, like the Alligator King and his Seven Sons, if it dovetails with what they're talking about that episode.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2007 09:52 AM

I liked Gina the veterinarian. When I saw her on The Sopranos throwing around the f-word I almost signed up for therapy.

Johnny Dickshot Sep 06 2007 10:25 AM

I'm sure I'll wind up watching a lot of Sesame Street in the future. And Elmo is prolly only a little worse that Captian Feathersword when it comes to annoying characters. That's the other show Jr. watches. With all the youngins around and coming we should set up some kinda all-purpose parenting thread

Rockin' Doc Sep 06 2007 11:04 AM

JD - "With all the youngins around and coming we should set up some kinda all-purpose parenting thread" Sorry, there is no magic formula for parenting. I recommend offering guidance, encouragement, and love on a regular basis. Beyond that, you will just have to try to figure it out as you go along while doing your best not to screw the little one's up too badly, just like us old timers did.

metsguyinmichigan Sep 06 2007 12:40 PM

Yancy Street Gang wrote: I liked Gina the veterinarian. When I saw her on The Sopranos throwing around the f-word I almost signed up for therapy. I confess that when my son was a toddler, we'd watch Sesame Street whether he wanted to or not just because of Gina! I assume she was an attempt to pull dads into the show, or at least get dads to leave it on.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2007 12:48 PM

Have any of you dads discovered The Big Comfy Couch yet? (It may no longer be on; my kids are both now too old for those beginner shows.) It was a weird show featuring a girl named Lanette dressed in a clown suit. At the end of the show, for some reason, she'd lie on her back on the floor and we'd watch from above as she writhed around assuming various clock positions. It was actually kind of disturbing. I never payed close enough attention to the show to understand what that was all about.

seawolf17 Sep 06 2007 01:04 PM

Yeah, this dad is definitely a fan of Dr. Gina. And Ms. Noodle (played by the wonderful Kristin Chenoweth) as well.

soupcan Sep 06 2007 01:52 PM

The favorites in my house were Barney, Teletubbies and the Wiggles. Big Comfy Couch and Dragon Tales also got some air time. I always thought the clown chick on BCC was pretty cute.

Edgy DC Sep 25 2007 07:00 PM

Number 821! Carlos Muniz! Congrats to his dad!

Gwreck Mar 31 2008 10:44 AM

#822 - Johan Santana #823 - Brian Schneider #824 - Angel Pagan (order might be reversed if we bat around in the first inning).

Valadius Mar 31 2008 10:46 AM

And Ryan Church.

John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 31 2008 10:53 AM

now why is Santana 1st of these? I though we were going in order they were announced, assuming they all get into the same game.

AG/DC Mar 31 2008 10:58 AM

I still think it should sort first in the order their appearances become official. If Pagan bats, he's first. If we go on defense before he bats, it's Santana, Schneider, Pagan, Church.

Gwreck Mar 31 2008 11:00 AM

AG/DC wrote: I still think it should sort first in the order their appearances become official. If Pagan bats, he's first. If we go on defense before he bats, it's Santana, Schneider, Pagan, Church. That was my thought as well.

Benjamin Grimm Mar 31 2008 11:19 AM

We had agreed on it being the lineup order, which, to me, makes the most sense. Remember, a player is officially in the game when the PA guy says his name. I know this is only really applicable for pinch-hitters and, I guess, pinch-runners, but it makes more sense than waiting for someone to touch a ball in the field. They're in the game whether the ball is hit to them or not.

Valadius Mar 31 2008 11:36 AM

Well how have we done it in years past? We can't change our methods on this now.

AG/DC Mar 31 2008 11:39 AM Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Mar 31 2008 11:42 AM

Sure. Why not? While they may not get credit for a game played if they throw a rod in the dugout, it's not like they can re-enter the game if they've been introduced but don't appear. But here's my thought. Scott Erickson hurt himself during warmups in game two, 2004. I don't know if the lineups had been read yet, but, if they had, and Erickson never rehabiltated (some might say he never did), and never returned to the team, would he be part of the great list o' Mets?

John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 31 2008 11:39 AM

I agree with YSG here. He convinced me of its rightness.

TheOldMole Mar 31 2008 11:41 AM

If they throw A-Rod in the dugout?

John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 31 2008 11:43 AM

]But here's my thought. Scott Erickson hurt himself during warmups in game two, 2004. I don't know if the lineups had been read yet, but, if they had, and Erickson never rehabiltated (some might say he never did), and never returned to the team, would he be part of the great list o' Mets? Not in my great list. I don;t think he was announced, by the way. Let's just assume that becoming official is a two-step process: Getting announced and participating in the game, but all participants enter into the sacred scrolls in the order they were announced.

Benjamin Grimm Mar 31 2008 11:43 AM

AG/DC wrote: But here's my thought. Scott Erickson hurt himself during warmups in game two, 2004. I don't know if the lineups had been read yet, but, if they had, and Erickson never rehabiltated (some might say he never did), and never returned to the team, would he be part of the great list o' Mets? If he got into the box score, then yes.

SteveJRogers Mar 31 2008 05:35 PM

#826 Matt Wise, welcome a-bord-ick!

SteveJRogers Mar 31 2008 05:40 PM

That leaves Raul Cassanova waiting to be #827

SteveJRogers Apr 02 2008 07:29 PM

Blame it on Pedro, not the Cassanova! Nelson Figueroa, wearing #27 is #827! Wonder if anyone's Met number and uni number ever matched up like this? Lunchbucket?

Rockin' Doc Apr 02 2008 07:54 PM

It must suck to be Raul Cassanova right now.

John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 02 2008 07:58 PM

SteveJRogers wrote: Blame it on Pedro, not the Cassanova! Nelson Figueroa, wearing #27 is #827! Wonder if anyone's Met number and uni number ever matched up like this? Lunchbucket? Sometime I will add a Met Count number to the site and tell you

AG/DC Apr 02 2008 08:00 PM

SteveJRogers wrote: Wonder if anyone's Met number and uni number ever matched up like this? Lunchbucket? Richie Ashburn.

SteveJRogers Apr 11 2008 05:41 PM

Met # 828 is the battery mate for # 827! Welcome aboard Raul Cassanova!

Valadius Apr 11 2008 07:42 PM

It's one "s".

Rockin' Doc Apr 12 2008 12:08 PM

Well, how were we to know that? He never got to play before. I've had to learn to spell Mientkiewicz and Schoeneweis in recent years, I guess is just took Casanova for granted. I shall do better in the future.

AG/DC Apr 26 2008 11:24 AM

Number 829! Gustavo Molina

SteveJRogers May 14 2008 07:39 AM

830 Fernando Tatis

metsguyinmichigan May 14 2008 07:50 AM

="SteveJRogers"]830 Fernando Tatis Why oh why is he wearing No. 17? Take it out of circulation to eventually hang on the wall.

Benjamin Grimm May 14 2008 07:55 AM

Nah. Keith was terrific, but I don't want to see his number retired.

metsguyinmichigan May 14 2008 10:09 AM

Benjamin Grimm wrote: Nah. Keith was terrific, but I don't want to see his number retired. But do you want to see it on people like Fernando Tatis? Fernando Martinez, maybe. But not a guy who packed only an overnight bag when he left New Orleans.

AG/DC May 14 2008 10:10 AM

If it causes Keith to publickly whine in the booth, you betcha. That's entertainment.

Benjamin Grimm May 14 2008 11:02 AM

metsguyinmichigan wrote: But do you want to see it on people like Fernando Tatis? Fernando Martinez, maybe. But not a guy who packed only an overnight bag when he left New Orleans. Doesn't bother me at all. As for Fernando Martinez, I'd rather he got a number that will more firmly belong to him. I think I'd give him a 25, if it were up to me.

AG/DC May 14 2008 11:07 AM

For what it's worth, he's wearing 19 in Binghamton now.

metsguyinmichigan May 14 2008 11:28 AM

Benjamin Grimm wrote: ="metsguyinmichigan"]But do you want to see it on people like Fernando Tatis? Fernando Martinez, maybe. But not a guy who packed only an overnight bag when he left New Orleans. Doesn't bother me at all. As for Fernando Martinez, I'd rather he got a number that will more firmly belong to him. I think I'd give him a 25, if it were up to me. Good point! Or have him salvage No. 43 -- which I read somewhere, can't remember where -- has yet to have a quality owner!

AG/DC May 14 2008 11:35 AM

Damn it, all threads lead to Armando. I feel pretty safe in declaring Armando the greatest 49 in baseball history.

SteveJRogers May 14 2008 05:14 PM

# 831 Claudio Vargas And also the 225th all-time starting pitcher in Met history!

SteveJRogers May 14 2008 05:21 PM

AG/DC wrote: Damn it, all threads lead to Armando. I feel pretty safe in declaring Armando the greatest 49 in baseball history. Not to give Kase any more annumition, but Armando never challanged Seaver's 69, or was rivaled by Gooden's 85 as dominat seasons in a New York uniform the way Guidry's 78 did.

AG/DC May 14 2008 06:54 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on May 14 2008 08:14 PM

What does that have to do with anything? Better yet, instead of leading seemingly every conversation --- including those you start --- off on untenable tangents, maybe update those blogs you pitch in your sig lines. One is six weeks out of date, one eight months.

metsguyinmichigan May 14 2008 07:46 PM

"Not to give Kase any more annumition, but Armando never challanged Seaver's 69, or was rivaled by Gooden's 85 as dominat seasons in a New York uniform the way Guidry's 78 did." I know I'm kinda new here and all. But sometimes I read Steve's posts and I wonder if deep down he has kind of a soft spot for the MFYs. Just saying. :)

Benjamin Grimm May 15 2008 07:29 AM

="SteveJRogers"]# 831 Claudio Vargas And also the 225th all-time starting pitcher in Met history! Second Met named Vargas, first named Claudio. Although there was one Claudell and one Claude. (Quick trivia question: which Met was named Claude?)

John Cougar Lunchbucket May 15 2008 07:29 AM

What happens in Vargas, stays in Vargas

Frayed Knot May 15 2008 07:36 AM

]Quick trivia question: which Met was named Claude? Skip Lockwood

Benjamin Grimm May 15 2008 07:41 AM

Yup. Quick question, quick answer.

Rockin' Doc May 15 2008 10:55 AM

metsguy -"I know I'm kinda new here and all. But sometimes I read Steve's posts and I wonder if deep down he has kind of a soft spot for the MFYs. Just saying." Steve is the Crane Pool's closet Yankee fan. At least silverdsl embraced her Yankee fandom. It seems that after she got married she jilted all of us Mets fans. She was a nice addition to the forum and I miss her input. I never thought I would say that about a Yankee fan.

Benjamin Grimm May 15 2008 10:59 AM

Silver briefly poked her nose in here just a week or two ago.

Rockin' Doc May 15 2008 11:07 AM

Sorry I missed her brief visit.

Benjamin Grimm May 15 2008 11:14 AM

This is the one post she's made in the last eight months: http://cranepoolforum.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=214925&highlight=#214925

AG/DC May 24 2008 09:45 PM

Meet Fernando Tatis, #832: Meet Nick Evans, #833:

soupcan May 25 2008 12:10 PM

He does sort of look like Magadan. They both have that Willem Dafoe scary, toothy face thing happening.

Benjamin Grimm May 25 2008 01:12 PM

AG/DC wrote: Meet Fernando Tatis, #832: Meet Nick Evans, #833: Tatis was 830. Vargas was 831 and Evans is 832.

AG/DC Jun 15 2008 10:36 PM

June 5: Abraham Nuñez, #833 June 6: Robinson Cancel, #834 June 11: Chris Aguila, #835 June 16: Trot Nixon, #836

SteveJRogers Jul 01 2008 05:58 PM

837 Andy Phillips 838 Tony Armas, Jr.

Frayed Knot Aug 05 2008 05:08 PM

This thread needs some serious updating. Knight Murphy Kunz Lugo others?

AG/DC Aug 05 2008 05:23 PM

Yeah, I jumped ship on this one. Sorry. I'll climb back aboard, or Backman aBordick. 838) July 3, 2008: Argenis Reyes 839) July 26, 2008: Brandon Knight 840) August 2, 2009: Daniel Murphy 841) August 3, 2008: Eddie Kunz Apparent 842) August ?, 2008: Ruddy Lugo

SteveJRogers Aug 05 2008 06:20 PM

The way things are going, the Mets might hit the 900 mark in 2010.

Gwreck Aug 05 2008 09:03 PM

Wait, I think we skipped a number again. A. Reyes was 839.

AG/DC Aug 19 2008 07:14 PM

839) July 3, 2008: Argenis Reyes 840) July 26, 2008: Brandon Knight 841) August 2, 2009: Daniel Murphy 842) August 3, 2008: Eddie Kunz 843) August 9, 2008: Brian Stokes 844) August 19, 2008: Luis Freaking Ayala! Ayala is the eighth Mexican in Mets history --- the first since... well, the guy he just relieved.

AG/DC Sep 02 2008 05:29 PM

845) September 1, 2008: Jonathan Niese I think that's 43 Mets on the year, with an outside chance for 50.

G-Fafif Sep 02 2008 05:31 PM

Ruddy Lugo long tosses with Jerry Moses.

SteveJRogers Sep 02 2008 06:04 PM

AG/DC wrote: 845) September 1, 2008: Jonathan Niese I think that's 43 Mets on the year, with an outside chance for 50. Little cart before the horse no? See Erickson, Scott.

AG/DC Sep 02 2008 06:11 PM

Game's underway. Lineup card is filled in. I'm confident.

AG/DC Sep 05 2008 07:29 PM

846) September 5, 2008: Ricardo Rincon

AG/DC Sep 07 2008 01:51 PM

846) September 7, 2008: Ramon Martinez

John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 07 2008 01:57 PM

You mean 847

AG/DC Sep 07 2008 02:04 PM

That's what cutting/pasting does for you. 847) September 7, 2008: Ramon Martinez

Frayed Knot Sep 15 2008 07:43 PM

Bobby Parnell = 848