Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Yanx - Sawx: Take One

Frayed Knot
Apr 20 2007 12:58 PM

Thought I'd create a seperate thread to follow along with the first installment of this little border war.

Sox come in with a one-game lead, have the home field for the weekend, and definitely have the on-paper pitching edge going in -- making it a good time to put some ground between them in the early going.
All of that, of course, will just make the New England cynics say are precisely the reasons why they'll get their butts kicked.


Friday: Pettitte (1-0; 1.50) v Schilling (2-1; 2.84)

Saturday: (3:55 FOX) Jeff Karstens (fresh off the DL) v Josh Beckett (3-0; 1.50 this season - although he's got a lot of making up to do for the eggs he laid in NYY games last year)

Sunday: (8:00 ESPN) Chase Wright (rookie making 2nd ML start) v Matsuzaka (1-2; 2.70 - and has pitched reasonably well in all three starts)


Sox have been pitching a lot better than they've been hitting. In particular, Crisp, Youkilis, Varitek, Pedroia, and even Manny have had slow starts.

Yanx are doing just about the opposite, usually needing to out-slug (and out-ARod) their opponents into submission in order to make up for their thin starting pitching. The pen has been needed to pitch fully half their innings so far.

Mariano has had only one save opportunity this season ... and didn't convert.
Papelbon (moved back to the closers spot) has been near perfect in 5 outings: 4/4 saves, 5-1/3 IPs, 1 H, 2 BBs, 0.00 ERA

Johnny Dickshot
Apr 20 2007 01:06 PM

Smoke 'em inside, I say.

iramets
Apr 20 2007 05:35 PM
Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

You really should have listened to thiis, if you're truly and sincerely puzzled by WTF I'm rattling on about concerning GMs who give decent, affable, thoughtful interviews without betraying their employers.

The high point for me was when M/MD asked about the disastrous trade to get Mirabelli back last summer. Theo kinda chuckled and said something, "That WAS a terrible trade, wasn't it? I really used poor judgment there. We were kind of desperate, looking for help finding someone who could catch Wakefield's knuckleball and what can I tell you, we overpaid badly for Mirabelli." Then after a few "Jeez!" and other carping and incoherent critical remarks from Dog, he elaborated on his reasons for giving up two good young players to get a washed up no-hit catcher: "That's what happens when you make moves under pressure, without thinking about the long-range future of your team-- you make bad deals, and that one was bad from day one, and I knew it almost as soon as I made it."

Note that he took responsibility, addressed his mistake upfront, made no excuses, didn't try to mitigate what he did, and M/MD had nothing critical to say that he hadn't already said. (Note also the complete sentences, and the getting straight to the point.)

They just interviewed Torre, but I'll let that go for the time being. Suffice to say, it was the best, least hostile, most informative, most un-defensive conversation with a NY manager I've heard lately.

ABG
Apr 20 2007 06:12 PM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

iramets wrote:
You really should have listened to thiis, if you're truly and sincerely puzzled by WTF I'm rattling on about concerning GMs who give decent, affable, thoughtful interviews without betraying their employers.

The high point for me was when M/MD asked about the disastrous trade to get Mirabelli back last summer. Theo kinda chuckled and said something, "That WAS a terrible trade, wasn't it? I really used poor judgment there. We were kind of desperate, looking for help finding someone who could catch Wakefield's knuckleball and what can I tell you, we overpaid badly for Mirabelli." Then after a few "Jeez!" and other carping and incoherent critical remarks from Dog, he elaborated on his reasons for giving up two good young players to get a washed up no-hit catcher: "That's what happens when you make moves under pressure, without thinking about the long-range future of your team-- you make bad deals, and that one was bad from day one, and I knew it almost as soon as I made it."

Note that he took responsibility, addressed his mistake upfront, made no excuses, didn't try to mitigate what he did, and M/MD had nothing critical to say that he hadn't already said. (Note also the complete sentences, and the getting straight to the point.)

They just interviewed Torre, but I'll let that go for the time being. Suffice to say, it was the best, least hostile, most informative, most un-defensive conversation with a NY manager I've heard lately.


I'll live with a GM and manager whose interviews you don't like.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/standings?date=20070420&type=reg&br=9&year=2007&order=false&st=2

metsmarathon
Apr 20 2007 06:31 PM

of course they want theo to agree to come on for an interview next time they're in town, so its in their best interest to be civil.

they dont have to be civil to the local managers.

iramets
Apr 20 2007 07:03 PM

Would ya listen to yourselves?

You're so determined to call me crazy, you're not taking into account fundamental facts like, I don't know, I pointed out that they had just had a civil, affable conversation with Joe freaking Torre who, far as I know, is not currently the manager of a team playing in Singapore, or that I specifically pointed out one of Mad Dog's rude comments to Theo (and implied that they were both their typical abrasive asshole selves to him), asking him rude questions about various stupid moves of his by which they clearly expected to show Theo up to public ridicule and which he handled with charm, modesty, pith and considerable useful information.

To say nothing of the fact that I was supplying one very specific response to the typical disbelieving question I get around here: "Oh, yeah, smart-guy, if other GMs are so clever and Omar's less articulate than many invertabrates and several floral displays, then why don't you supply us with a specific interview with one of these so-called 'smarter' General managers so we can see what you're blabbing about? You know why, smartass? Because there AREN'T any and you KNOW IT. So, Yah!"

If the only answer you'll accept is "Omar is smarter and more articulate than Satan, and more decent and helpful than Jesus," then there's no dealing with you, but don't make that out to be any fault of mine.

Edgy DC
Apr 20 2007 07:11 PM

We have a preview for the Yankees-Sox Series and not the Mets-Braves series.

iramets
Apr 20 2007 07:16 PM

Edgy DC wrote:
We have a preview for the Yankees-Sox Series and not the Mets-Braves series.

Sure glad I didn't start this thread.

metsmarathon
Apr 20 2007 07:58 PM

c'mon, ira. they's sainted torre a long long time ago.

unfortunately, ive not heard the interview - maybe its on the net - but m&md certainly conduct themselves differently when they're interviewing out of town execs & managers than they do met execs and managers. i dont remember how they treated yankee execs and managers prior to '98, of course, but there's a whole lot that they have do do brutally wrong to wash away that late 90s aura, especially with francessa.

if/when the mets are crowned undisputed kings of the city, it wont matter if omar drools uncontrollably enough to short out his microphone while ranting and raving in klewok, a homebrew amalgam of klingon and ewok, they'll still treat him civilly.

iramets
Apr 20 2007 08:35 PM

metsmarathon wrote:
if omar drools uncontrollably enough to short out his microphone while ranting and raving in klewok, a homebrew amalgam of klingon and ewok

How would you tell?

Johnny Dickshot
Apr 20 2007 10:19 PM

Mariano blew another lead meanwhile sox with a 5-run 8th lead MFYs 7-6 in the 9th.

Mets honored Jackie Robinson tonight; Red Sox honoring Shawn Green:

Johnny Dickshot
Apr 20 2007 10:24 PM

Sox releiever Okajima on to close it out -- crazy looking delivery he has. Arod has 2 HRs and 4 RBI already, batting NOW!!!

Johnny Dickshot
Apr 20 2007 10:31 PM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

iramets wrote:

They just interviewed Torre, but I'll let that go for the time being. Suffice to say, it was the best, least hostile, most informative, most un-defensive conversation with a NY manager I've heard lately.

I clearly don't care, but does it bother you to discover he lied? Dog asked whether he'd bring Mariano in for more a an inning and Joe said he wouldn't. You heard it.

MFS62
Apr 20 2007 10:58 PM

Have you noticed Jeter when the news shows clips of A-Rod's homers?He's been the first one to greet A-Rod after one of his homers, either at home plate or in front of the dugout.

Last year, when A-Rod was having tough times, Jeter avoided him like he was a radioactive leper.

"Oh Captain, Their Captain" is a front-running maggot, just like his fans.

Later

SteveJRogers
Apr 20 2007 10:59 PM

Johnny Dickshot wrote:
Mariano blew another lead meanwhile sox with a 5-run 8th lead MFYs 7-6 in the 9th.

Yet somehow MFY fans will still blame the loss on ARod!

iramets
Apr 21 2007 06:24 AM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

Johnny Dickshot wrote:
="iramets"]
They just interviewed Torre, but I'll let that go for the time being. Suffice to say, it was the best, least hostile, most informative, most un-defensive conversation with a NY manager I've heard lately.

I clearly don't care, but does it bother you to discover he lied? Dog asked whether he'd bring Mariano in for more a an inning and Joe said he wouldn't. You heard it.

Actually, I didn't hear that (I was skipping around the dial). But do I care? I might, if I were a Yankee fan.

My question for you is: Is it a "lie" when Willie does it? Because he does it, every interview, every statement to the press, etc., and seem to get angry only when I characterize the chronic misstatements that inhabit Willie's oral cavity as "lies."

When Willie does it, you're all "He changed his MIND! A person can CHANGE his mind, can't he? How DARE you question Willie's honesty?? When you call him a liar, you're the LIAR! LIAR! LIAR!" OK, that's not you, that's Ms. Met, but still...it's funny how you can pick flyshit out of a pepper-box and slap any other major league manager with it but when a steaming turd is staring you in the face on your dinner plate, it's fine when it's Willie's steaming turd.

The strange thing about Joe's lie (and I have no problem calling it that) is that, like so many of Willie's, he had an easy out. When MD yaps "Ya gonna use Mariano in the eighth, Joe? Huh, are ya? Huh?" all he has to do is say "I doubt it, Chris, doubt it very much. I want to stick to the plan, which is to use him sparingly," he could have then used him in the eighth and not techncially lied, which is his usual smooth and evasive technique.

It's interesting that he did use him, though, doncha think? After foolishly committing himself in public to a policy that was more conservative than it needed to be, Joe spit the bit when the Sox threatened in the eighth, and forced his elderly reliever out there in a spot--8th inning, early season--where he'd made a careful plan NOT to use him. Kinda suggests that Torre was panicking a bit.

So I'm happy to call Joe Torre a liar and a bit-spitter and totally inconsistent last night. If he keeps it up all season long, he'll tie Willie for the year.

Except of course he was candid after the game, telling reporters flat out "I lied," which Willie never does. Here's a link to the "Joe Lies" [url=http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/2007/04/21/2007-04-21_say_it_aint_so_joe_torre_goes_back_on_hi-2.html] story. [/url] Apparently, it wasn't just last night with MD but a policy he's been stating since spring training.

Gwreck
Apr 21 2007 07:43 AM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

iramets wrote:
but when a steaming turd is staring you in the face on your dinner plate, it's fine when it's Willie's steaming turd.

As long as the Mets are winning, Willie can tell boldfaced lies to the press every day and I'll be just fine with that.

iramets
Apr 21 2007 07:54 AM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

Gwreck wrote:
="iramets"]but when a steaming turd is staring you in the face on your dinner plate, it's fine when it's Willie's steaming turd.

As long as the Mets are winning, Willie can tell boldfaced lies to the press every day and I'll be just fine with that.

Thank you for your honesty. Not many here are willing to agree that they care only about the bottom line, and Willie can be a retarded chimpanzee, for all they care, as long as the team wins.

Of course, when the team loses, as it has recently shown it's so richly capable of (when the WIlpons are in their favored mode of "Spend all the money in the world, so long as you spend it stupidly"), I expect you to be right beside me calling for the chimp's head on a pike.

Gwreck
Apr 21 2007 08:11 AM
Re: Theo on Mike and MD earlier today

iramets wrote:
="Gwreck"]
iramets wrote:
but when a steaming turd is staring you in the face on your dinner plate, it's fine when it's Willie's steaming turd.

As long as the Mets are winning, Willie can tell boldfaced lies to the press every day and I'll be just fine with that.

Thank you for your honesty. Not many here are willing to agree that they care only about the bottom line, and Willie can be a retarded chimpanzee, for all they care, as long as the team wins.

Big difference between what I wrote and what you did. A retarded chimpanzee is not OK. I'm on the record with typically criticizing Randolph one to three times per game, usually on strategic decisions or bench/bullpen management. As I said earlier though, what he says to the press is basically completely irrelevant to my evaluation of him, given the results he's produced.

I'll give a re-eval to the sitatuation if and when the Mets endure losing under Randolph.

Kid Carsey
Apr 21 2007 08:15 AM

I only care about winning too and don't really care if Willie lies, has the IQ
of a bar stool leg, or picks his nose and stuffs his snots in his ear.

This constant collective judgement of everyone's ability to reason is tiresome.

iramets
Apr 21 2007 08:28 AM

Kid Carsey wrote:
This constant collective judgement of everyone's ability to reason is tiresome.

I think you're being very unfair to Gwreck here, KC. Why can't he claim to be "typically criticizing Randolph one to three times per game, usually on strategic decisions or bench/bullpen management" without your accusing him of being a repetitious bore? Personally, I find such criticism interesting and valuable.

Kid Carsey
Apr 21 2007 08:32 AM

Because I like Gwreck. You, I'm not so sure many days.

There, I said it.

Good day, sir.

Rotblatt
Apr 21 2007 08:34 AM

]Yet somehow MFY fans will still blame the loss on ARod!

So I was at a restaurant last night that was infested with a bunch of suit-wearing Yankee fans, and one foaming-at-the-mouth 10-year old boy wearing a shirt with the Yankee logo and a caption reading, "Do the Math." This kid was seriously straight out of Dawn of the Dead--he was leaping out of his seat and clapping his hands, pounding his fist on the table, and yelling pretty much non-stop--while his family was quietly having dinner around him. I was too far away to hear what he was yelling, but the subtext was obviously, "Kill! Kill! Kill!"

Anyway, I'm standing at the bar watching the TV, which is on close-captioning, and Jeter is fielding a ball insanely deep in the hole and does his balletic pirrouette-jump-throw thing, to second base, and not only was the runner already there, his throw was completely off-line, and he was lucky it didn't end up an error. I'm trying hard not to laugh my ass off when I see on the close captioning, "That was a good play by Jeter." I blurt out, "How the hell was that a good play? He would have been better off putting it in his pocket," and one of the suited, loud, Yankee fans turns to me, makes eye contact and say, "A-ROD WOULD HAVE MADE THAT PLAY," while shaking his head.

Thinking I'd entered the Twighlight Zone, I nodded and backed away slowly, returning to my table.

What is the world coming to when a Yankee fan criticizes Jeter AND lavishes praise on A-Rod in the same breath?

iramets
Apr 21 2007 08:39 AM

Kid Carsey wrote:
Because I like Gwreck. You, I'm not so sure many days.

There, I said it.

Good day, sir.

I thank you too for your refreshing honesty that you sometimes spend weeks or months on end denying.

iramets
Apr 21 2007 08:44 AM

Rotblatt wrote:
Anyway, I'm standing at the bar watching the TV, which is on close-captioning, and Jeter is fielding a ball insanely deep in the hole and does his balletic pirrouette-jump-throw thing, to second base, and not only was the runner already there, his throw was completely off-line, and he was lucky it didn't end up an error. I'm trying hard not to laugh my ass off when I see on the close captioning, "That was a good play by Jeter." I blurt out, "How the hell was that a good play? He would have been better off putting it in his pocket," and one of the suited, loud, Yankee fans turns to me, makes eye contact and say, "A-ROD WOULD HAVE MADE THAT PLAY," while shaking his head.

Thinking I'd entered the Twighlight Zone, I nodded and backed away slowly, returning to my table.

What is the world coming to when a Yankee fan criticizes Jeter AND lavishes praise on A-Rod in the same breath?

Did you see the Times article earlier this week, where someone showed Jeter some range factor stats that showed him, for all his flashy ballet and adagio bullshit, to be 25th out of 30 MLB ss's last year in range? He gave a typical "Oh, yeah, did that stat take into account every pitch-count, weather condition, hemmorhoidal itch that every player, manager, and fan dealt with last year? No? Then it's obviously bullshit." It was so colossally ignorant, it woulda made Reality Chuck proud.

Frayed Knot
Apr 21 2007 08:51 AM

]If the only answer you'll accept is "Omar is smarter and more articulate than Satan, and more decent and helpful than Jesus," then there's no dealing with you, but don't make that out to be any fault of mine.

This, I can only assume, is directed at all those here who have been constantly touting Omar as a polished public speaker.


In the meantime, what looked like a typical (read: frustrating) Yanx/Sawx game - what with ARod continuing to be insane and Pettitte pitching like it's 1999 - suddenly turned on a few key ABs and a few Torre decisions (not all bad necc) that backfired.
- first Posada had to leave and he was stuck with Will (I haven't had a hit all year) Nieves catching. Nieves was then on-deck when the last out was made but Torre was ready to PH with his DH/3rd catcher Phelps if the inning continued
- he then pulled Proctor after just 2/3 IP in favor of his LOOGY Myers to pitch to Papi in the 8th (didn't work), then had to go to Vizcaino for the rest of the inning and he was the real culprit
- he also pinch-ran for Giambi trying for what was then a tack-on run (didn't get it) and it was Giambi's spot which came up w/2 outs in the 9th and the tying run on base. Kevin Thompson batter instead and K'd to end the game.
- and the big blow against Mariano - Crisp's 2RBI triple - was really nothing more than a 2-hopper that got between Meintky and the bag as he wasn't guarding the line w/the tying run on 1st

iramets
Apr 21 2007 09:22 AM

Frayed Knot wrote:
]If the only answer you'll accept is "Omar is smarter and more articulate than Satan, and more decent and helpful than Jesus," then there's no dealing with you, but don't make that out to be any fault of mine.

This, I can only assume, is directed at all those here who have been constantly touting Omar as a polished public speaker.

Astonishing as it may seem to you, there are those on this site who have said as much within the last 24 hours.

]In the meantime, what looked like a typical (read: frustrating) Yanx/Sawx game - what with ARod continuing to be insane and Pettitte pitching like it's 1999 - suddenly turned on a few key ABs and a few Torre decisions (not all bad necc) that backfired.
- first Posada had to leave and he was stuck with Will (I haven't had a hit all year) Nieves catching. Nieves was then on-deck when the last out was made but Torre was ready to PH with his DH/3rd catcher Phelps if the inning continued
- he then pulled Proctor after just 2/3 IP in favor of his LOOGY Myers to pitch to Papi in the 8th (didn't work), then had to go to Vizcaino for the rest of the inning and he was the real culprit
- he also pinch-ran for Giambi trying for what was then a tack-on run (didn't get it) and it was Giambi's spot which came up w/2 outs in the 9th and the tying run on base. Kevin Thompson batter instead and K'd to end the game.
- and the big blow against Mariano - Crisp's 2RBI triple - was really nothing more than a 2-hopper that got between Meintky and the bag as he wasn't guarding the line w/the tying run on 1st

Supposedly, Mariano had been throwing 89-91 (as opposed to his customary 93-94) and Man-cave-itch would have been playing Crisp correctly ("he'll never get around on Mariano") had Mariona been Mariano. In a larger sense, what troubles me about Torre's reliance on Mariano's continued excellence is that, if Mariano comes up dry, which isn't impossible at his age, and never pitches well again, the Yankees have no prayer. That's a lot to rely on a single player for--Joe has to pitch him in clutch spots throughout the year, and if he goes south, goombye Division, goombye wildcard, goombye playoffs, goombye Joe.

Yancy Street Gang
Apr 21 2007 09:51 AM

iramets wrote:
="Frayed Knot"]
]If the only answer you'll accept is "Omar is smarter and more articulate than Satan, and more decent and helpful than Jesus," then there's no dealing with you, but don't make that out to be any fault of mine.

This, I can only assume, is directed at all those here who have been constantly touting Omar as a polished public speaker.

Astonishing as it may seem to you, there are those on this site who have said as much within the last 24 hours.

I'll PayPal you a nickel for every such example you can find.

iramets
Apr 21 2007 10:03 AM

Yancy Street Gang wrote:
I'll PayPal you a nickel for every such example you can find.

Somebody just claimed that Omar is plenty articulate--it was the thread where CF dissented from this opinion. Don't know where--maybe CF can remember.

Can you Paypal me the nickel now? I need the money.

metirish
Apr 21 2007 10:10 AM

The guy that wrote the article I linked in the Imus thread said Omar is articulate,not sure if anyone here did though.

iramets
Apr 21 2007 10:13 AM

metirish wrote:
The guy that wrote the article I linked in the Imus thread said Omar is articulate,not sure if anyone here did though.

That's prolly what I was thinking of. My bad.

If Yancy will extend it past 24 hours, though, I can find someone and collect multiple nickels.

silverdsl
Apr 21 2007 11:02 PM

MFS62 wrote:
Have you noticed Jeter when the news shows clips of A-Rod's homers?He's been the first one to greet A-Rod after one of his homers, either at home plate or in front of the dugout.

Last year, when A-Rod was having tough times, Jeter avoided him like he was a radioactive leper.

"Oh Captain, Their Captain" is a front-running maggot, just like his fans.

Later

I think Jeter greeted A-Rod after homeruns and stuff last season too, but there was a lot less good times on the field for A-Rd last season as compared to this season so far. IMO, both this season and last there's a degree of "show" there in relation to all their interactions on the field because they don't want to give the media or fans anything to speculate about regarding how friendly or not they are with each other.

And yes, no matter how awesome of a game A-Rod has, there's likely still some fan somewhere, who is cussing A-Rod for not winning another game for the Yankees. The unfortunate thing about him having such a hot start to the season is that some fans will expect him to hit like this all season which is impossible. He's going to get ripped as soon as he cools off at the plate which is unavoidable.

metirish
Apr 21 2007 11:05 PM

Jeter is top stepping it no matter what...

iramets
Apr 22 2007 07:02 AM

is this a GREAT series or what? I literally could not turn off the TV last night, with the Sox up 7-4 in the 7th. I had someplace to be, other than my living room, but I stayed stuck to my chair because I knew that there was real danger of the lead changing hands, especually with A-Rod coming to bat again. As it happened, Papelbon took care of the Yankees in the 9th (getting Captain Clutch to make a weak out) and standing Rodriguez in the on-deck circle, knowing if he batted it would be with two men on and two runs down--great drama, even if he never faced Papelbon in that spot. I was totally jazzed by the two victories, and enjoyed them richly as fantastic baseball, whomever I was rooting for.

I turned up late at my event, and could not have cared less.

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 09:54 AM

]That's prolly what I was thinking of. My bad.
If Yancy will extend it past 24 hours, though, I can find someone and collect multiple nickels

That search bearing any fruit yet? ... Or do we just assume that the strategy is going forward is to hear something somewhere then pretend that "multiple" people here said it so as to set yourself up as the lone voice of truth howling against the uninformed masses?

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 10:07 AM

Winning Friday was really the key to this series for Boston. It was the only game in which the Yanx had anywhere near an even pitching matchup, plus they had Mariano available while Papelbon was not. Then when Pettitte outpitched Schilling AND ARod continued his insane streak it was all set up for the Bronx boys until their pen collapsed late amid a couple of questionable choices by Torre.

Saturday started to look like a give-back when Beckett looked like he was continuing his awful pitching vs the Yanx from last year by giving up more runs in the 1st & 2nd innings than he had in his first 3 starts combined. But he straightened out after that while Karstens was even worse and the Sox eventually out-clubbed 'em even as they missed several chances to make it a blow out. The "other" Japanese pitcher for Boston - Hidecki Okajima - looks like he'll be a useful multi-purpose pen guy and got some big outs in both games.


Yanx are winless this season in games where ARod does NOT homer.

iramets
Apr 22 2007 11:33 AM

Frayed Knot wrote:
]That's prolly what I was thinking of. My bad.
If Yancy will extend it past 24 hours, though, I can find someone and collect multiple nickels

That search bearing any fruit yet? ... Or do we just assume that the strategy is going forward is to hear something somewhere then pretend that "multiple" people here said it so as to set yourself up as the lone voice of truth howling against the uninformed masses?

Still waiting to see if Yancy will pay me a nickel for everyone who's expressed support of Omar's articulateness here, or if it's just in the last 24 hours.

But as long as I have YOU on the horn, what will YOU do when I identify those CPFers who have disagreed with my thesis that Omar lacks (relative to other MLB GMs) articulateness? Will you get in their faces, as you get in mne? Or is this just another chops-busting exercise, in which you make me track down positions taken and, then when I comes up woth those who've held those positions, do an Emily Litella and go "Oh, never mind"? How about promising to change your handle to Emily Litella and adopting a suitably embarrassing sig line for a year if I can find multiple miscreants who've defended Omar's ability to articulate?

Yancy Street Gang
Apr 22 2007 11:53 AM

I'll give you the whole month of April.

iramets
Apr 22 2007 12:49 PM

Okay, I had to go back to the end of March, so you're off the hook for the nickels, Yancy, but in [url=http://cybermessageboard.ehost.com/getalife/viewtopic.php?t=5933&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0] this[/url] thread, we can see Nymr83 saying that he thought Omar's interview w/ M& MD (which I thought was a definition of "inarticulateness") was nothing short of "brilliant", KC asserting that "it was a fine interview," Soupy opining that Omar's interview was "excellent"--do you need more?

Yancy Street Gang
Apr 22 2007 04:06 PM

Nope. Nice job.

I'm glad I didn't extend the deadline back into March!

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 09:39 PM

Game 3:
Yanx giving Andrew Dice-Kay a bit of a hard time; he's walked a few, hit a few, and given up a few hits as the Yanx took a 3-0 led.
Meanwhile, the Sawx were hitless against Chase Wright in his 2nd ML start until ... BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, BOOM!!!! in the bottom of the 3rd when Manny, Drew, Lowell & Varitek went back-to-back-to back-to back and there was nuthin' cheap about any of them.

4 - 3 Sox in the 4th. Yanx have changed pitchers.

Nymr83
Apr 22 2007 09:50 PM

that was a beautiful thing. i hope to see 4 straight homers against the yankees more often.

Nymr83
Apr 22 2007 10:14 PM

jeter homer ties it. yankee fans may now ignore everything arod has done this year and point to this jeter homer as the most important hit of the year.

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 10:29 PM

Yanx take a 5-4 lead into the 7th on that Jeter HR plus an RBI GO.

Andy Pettitte - in his 2nd relief appearance of the year so far - pitched the 6th.
Matsuzaka still dealing for Boston.

That was the [u:1176a89f40]2nd time[/u:1176a89f40] in MLB history that [u:1176a89f40]one pitcher[/u:1176a89f40] has served up 4 straight HRs. When the Dodgers did that crazy 4-straight thing in the 9th inning of a game last year it was 2 each off of 2 different hurlers.

Johnny Dickshot
Apr 22 2007 10:41 PM

Thank you, Scott Proctor, for taking our names off the back page of tomorrow's Daily News.

Sincerely,

Scott Schoenweis & Aaron Heilman

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 10:42 PM

Proctor, Proctor give us the news
Sox got a bad case of smacking you

1B, 2B, 3R HR (Lowell) to Scott Proctor's first 3 batters of bottom 7th and it's 7-5 Boston.

Exit Proctor, enter Luis Vizcaino.

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 11:06 PM

Jeez Coco ... You lay flat-out to rob DWright with a bases-loaded game-saver last year and now you let that pice-o-shit blooper land at your feet right after you're put in for defense?!!?
C'mon man, you're on national TV!

Frayed Knot
Apr 22 2007 11:44 PM

Papillion in to face the top of the NYY order and try to protect a 1-run lead:
- Damon - FO7
- Jeter - K Swinging (oooh, not so clutch this time!)
- Abreu - BB
- Rodriguez - FC 5-4

... and the sweep is complete!