Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


So I'm Sitting Here Minding My Own Business....Dec. 2001

Centerfield
May 08 2007 07:17 PM
Edited 2 time(s), most recently on May 08 2007 07:44 PM

What would an archive be without an entry from our old friend. Some really good stuff in here. Widey attempts to restrain Ms. Met from exercising her Constitutional right to an opinion! Sal claims to think rationally for 30 minutes a week! marathon refuses to kiss CF! All in one thread!


Ms Met II
Clint Hurdle — C, OF, 3B, 1983, 1985, 1987
Posts: 222
(12/14/01 7:22 pm)


So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

...eating my breakfast and reading the Times this morning when I practically gagged on my toast! I was scanning past all the "gee, look, Giambi is finally a @#%$" crap on the sports page and I spy not one but TWO articles complaining about how the @#%$ and METS are spoiling baseball for the rest of the teams and their fans by using all of their various cable contract revenue to snap up all the high priced, top of the line talent.

One article I could've dismissed as the ramblings of a writer who obviously hadn't done his homework, but TWO articles?! What gives? Have these people been asleep for the last decade or so, or are they really that annoyed by the Alomar deal?

Last time I looked, with the exception of the Piazza deal, the Mets hadn't made much of a move in terms of big name guys. And I was under the impression that it was the @#%$ with all of the lucrative cable deals. Which is why all we poor schlub Met fans have to pay extra to get FSNY.

We've got Fred "the miser" Wilpon doling out money with an eyedropper, in case no-one had noticed, while Mr. @#%$ (god, I love that censor stuff!) dishes out millions right and left whenever the feeling hits him.

Steve Phillips steals two sure fire future HOF'ers from teams who are trying desperately to offload salary and suddenly we're the bad guys? Maybe it's just me, but I don't get it. Steve Phillips did his job, it's not his fault the other GM's were sleeping. As far as I can tell, the Mets have no reason to feel guilty.
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LF
Octavio Dotel — SP, RP, 1999
Posts: 117
(12/14/01 7:46 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

We've got Fred "the miser" Wilpon doling out money with an eyedropper



Not only does this continue this fantasy you have where Doubleday is responsible for all the good and Wilpon for all the bad - but $95mil must come from one helluva an eydropper.

Considering that, plus the claim that the organization lost money on that payroll last year; what level of would you consider sufficient?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Clint Hurdle — C, OF, 3B, 1983, 1985, 1987
Posts: 224
(12/15/01 1:21 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

You left out a word, LF, what level of WHAT would I consider sufficient?

As for our ownership, it's not my intention to paint Nelson Doubleday as some kind of patron saint. God knows, he's made his mistakes along the way and he's been in the background more than the foreground in recent years. Still, imo Fred Wilpon has put his own interests ahead of the team's more often than not and I certainly wouldn't say that the Mets have been major players in terms of signing big name guys. Certainly not to the extent that the @#%$ have, and certainly not enough to deserve being lumped in with the boys from the Bronx for a collective Bronx cheer from the rest of baseball.

I just found those articles a little off the mark. $95 million payroll or not, we certainly haven't been standing in anyone's way in regard to signing big name players. Just ask the Rangers, to whom we practically handed A-Rod on a silver platter (or platinum, considering the size of his contract). The majority of the really big money deals in baseball in recent years have NOT involved the Mets: ARod, Griffey, Mussina, Hampton, Giambi. The top eight guys in salary were listed in another thread here yesterday, at least two, if not three, of those eight are @#%$. Not ONE of them is a Met. Wilpon may be spending the money, but he sure ain't spending it on the top tier.
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LF
Alex Escobar — OF, 2001
Posts: 121
(12/15/01 4:51 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

what level of WHAT would I consider sufficient?


Payroll.

Wilpon may be spending the money, but he sure ain't spending it on the top tier.


Yes he is.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 241
(12/15/01 7:21 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Payroll - that's what I figured. $95 million is about right considering the market we're in. I've got no problem with the amount of the current budget, just with how Wilpon deigns to spend it.

Uh, other than Piazza and now Alomar, who have we got on the team who would be considered a top tier player? I can't think of anyone, except maybe Al Leiter, but I'm not even sure about Al anymore. Is Fonzie considered top tier? If so, he still ranks as a bargain, at least until we start talking contract extension.

And going into this off-season, Steve Phillips came right out and stated that we couldn't go for any big name FA's, all of our moves had to be done through trade. And even in the trades, aside from Alomar, all of the potential objects and all of the guys we've picked up have been something other than "top tier". In the meantime, Fat George and his stooges have been snapping up all of the big names right and left. I still don't see how we manage to rank with them on this score.


Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LF
Alex Escobar — OF, 2001
Posts: 122
(12/15/01 8:10 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

I have much trouble following you at times.

* You say that we're handing out money with an eyedropper -
then say that the current level is about right -
then continually blame only Wilpon for not spending it right (even though it's not him that spends it).

There's no way we could have gone after "big name guys" this year without first clearing payroll; ie. making trades. (That $95 figure's about right - remember)

In the last week, SP has improved the team while keeping payroll similar to, or maybe slighty below (w/Justice gone), last year's figure (when they supposedly lost money).

From this point on, it's a question whether you add missing pices through the FA route - depending on whether how those targets are priced;
OR
via trades - depending on what the human & dollar prices are on that front.

The owners come in if/when SP says that he believes certain player X is 'getable' and will make all the difference but will push the payroll to level Y.
According to both owners, the decision to green-light such a move has always been made jointly.


(on edit) if your point is that we're not spending like the @#%$ then you're right, nobody is, because nobody else has their revenues.

Edited by: LF at: 12/15/01 7:18:07 pm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 242
(12/16/01 2:33 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

(on edit) if your point is that we're not spending like the @#%$ then you're right, nobody is, because nobody else has their revenues.


That's precisely my point - I thought I'd made that clear from the beginning, guess I wasn't as clear as I thought. What I didn't understand is why the writers of the columns in question were lumping us in with the @#%$ as dominating the market when it's patently untrue.

And for the record - I have no problem with what SP has done this off-season. Frankly, I think he often takes more flak than he deserves given what he's been able to do and the restrictions under which he normally has to operate. This off-season ranks right up there with mid-season '98 when he pulled off the Piazza coup.

As for the owners - I'm not sure that much is done "jointly" with those two, no matter what they'd have us think, because they've never been able to agree on much. Whatever the case, I do think that with $95 million - a very reasonable sum - to work with, they could've gotten more for their money. There have been some questionable financial moves made in recent years and the majority of them can be traced to Fred Wilpon's desire to fund a new stadium. At least, that's the chorus that keeps getting repeated every time a "penny pinching" type move is made. If that's not the case, as I've indicated in this and other threads, I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wide BeeGee
Stanley Jefferson — OF, 1986
Posts: 143
(12/16/01 4:42 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

There have been some questionable financial moves made in recent years and the majority of them can be traced to Fred Wilpon's desire to fund a new stadium.


Like what?


At least, that's the chorus that keeps getting repeated every time a "penny pinching" type move is made.


Chorus? What are you talking about?

If that's not the case, as I've indicated in this and other threads, I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong.


Guilty until proven innocent, I see. Why don't you just admit you're out of your depth on this subject UNTIL you can prove something?

Edited by: Wide BeeGee at: 12/16/01 3:43:38 pm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 246
(12/17/01 10:54 am)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Uh, with all due respect YGB, I've stated several times that my take on Mr. Wilpon is my opinion and the last time I looked I was entitled to my own opinion, whether or not you and others here agree with it. As I said, I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong, but, with the exception of bill metsiac, all anyone here has done is challenge my right to my opinion rather than offer any proof to counter it.

If you want to prove me wrong, be my guest, but stop trying to deny me the right to my own opinion.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


metsmarathon
Kevin Brown, RP, 1990
Posts: 198
(12/17/01 11:10 am)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

just to jump in here, but im more comfortable with the burden of proof being on the one with the differing opinion. or really on the one with the opinion.
otherwise it gets too easy to just say, 'thats my opinion, and it doesnt matter why i made it, or for whatever willy-nilly reasons.'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Gene Walter — RP, 1987-1988
Posts: 250
(12/17/01 11:25 am)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Well, I'm sorry mm, but I don't have a list of names and dates or anything else that anyone here would likely accept as proof. I know that I've read many things over the last several years which have stated that Wilpon was focused on the new stadium and I know that I've watched this team go the budget route instead of going after big names like ARod, Gonzalez, Giambi, etc. will little real explanation except for Wilpon's continued chorus of "we're sticking to our present budget". I also know that all the reports around the time of the Piazza signing had Nelson Doubleday pushing Steve Phillips to get it done and Fred Wilpon balking at the cost. Obviously, any or all of these reports could be wrong, and I could be wrong for believing them, but as I said, I have yet to see anything to the contrary.

If you want anything more specific, I'm afraid I can't furnish it, which I'm sure makes me wrong as far as most folks are concerned. So be it.
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edgy DC II
ezOP
Posts: 669
(12/17/01 12:20 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Nobody gave A-Rod to the Rangers on any kind of platter. They are paying dearly for him and will continue to. They can have him.
Walter, how come you let him hit it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wide BeeGee
Allen Watson — RP, SP, 1999
Posts: 153
(12/17/01 12:28 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

That's all well and good except very little in your statement here is true:

I know that I've read many things over the last several years which have stated that Wilpon was focused on the new stadium


So?

and I know that I've watched this team go the budget route instead of going after big names like ARod, Gonzalez, Giambi, etc. will little real explanation except for Wilpon's continued chorus of "we're sticking to our present budget".


First of all you've already said in this thread that 95 million is appropriate for this team. How is that the "budget route"?

How do you know we won't go after Gonzalez? More importanly, how do you know we NEED to?

Giambi wasn't pursued because we don't need a first baseman/DH nor a bidding war with the @#%$. Is that not a "real" explanation?

Arod cost too much, but why not ask Doubleday to be sure.

I also know that all the reports around the time of the Piazza signing had Nelson Doubleday pushing Steve Phillips to get it done and Fred Wilpon balking at the cost.


Yet, we went and did it anyway and ... imagine ... we find that money's tight. It's possible that Wilpon felt that spreading out that sum over several players would be the better option. Using your argument it would seem that Doubleday is the one saying "Who cares about winning, we have a star attraction."

Obviously, any or all of these reports could be wrong, and I could be wrong for believing them, but as I said, I have yet to see anything to the contrary.


Yes you have. You've seen dozens of challenges to your line of thought on this subject from a number of reasonable people. You should also be aware of the oft-repeated statements from SP that Fred could give him flexibility in the event he needed it ~ which to this point, SP hasn't yet.

If you want anything more specific, I'm afraid I can't furnish it, which I'm sure makes me wrong as far as most folks are concerned. So be it.


You're wrong not because you can't produce proof -- you're wrong because you made up your mind absent of it, or at least without considering all that is available.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Norrin Radd
Alberto Castillo — C, 1995-1998
Posts: 101
(12/17/01 12:31 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

what da wide man said...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kasey62
Andy Hassler — RP, SP, 1979
Posts: 232
(12/17/01 12:33 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Ms. Met's gonna gag on her toast again when she reads this

Well I just wanna have some fun
I probably won't see no money
I just wanna have some fun
'fore they throw me in the sanitarium


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Gene Walter — RP, 1987-1988
Posts: 253
(12/17/01 3:00 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

I'm not gonna gag, KC, 'cause I ain't reading it. I've said what I have to say, I don't expect YGB or many others here to accept it. I should've known better than to open my mouth in the first place, but I thought this was a board built on the notion of respect and open-mindedness. Guess I should've known better!

And edgy - yes, you're right, the Rangers payed dearly for ARod and I'm not shedding tear one over that whole episode, I only offered it as one of many instances where the Mets were generally thought to be front-runners for a big name FA and blew off the opportunity for whatever reason. I was challenged to give proof - that was as good as I could give. I'm sorry if it doesn't live up to the standards of some here.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kasey62
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 244
(12/17/01 3:11 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Hey, no pouting, Edgy edicted it last week.

Well I just wanna have some fun
I probably won't see no money
I just wanna have some fun
'fore they throw me in the sanitarium


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Gene Walter — RP, 1987-1988
Posts: 256
(12/17/01 3:32 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Pouting? Who's pouting? Believe me, KC, you'd know if I was pouting...I pout much better than that! I was annoyed - I don't suppose edgy's got an edict about THAT, does he?
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Willets Point
Ray Searage — RP, 1981
Posts: 332
(12/17/01 3:34 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Ms. Met...deeeeeeep cleansing breath. In the nose, out the mouth. Reeeeelax.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wide BeeGee
Fernando Viña — 2B, 3B, SS, OF, 1994
Posts: 161
(12/17/01 3:35 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

And thank you for showing the "respect and open-mindedness" it would take to address the points.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Gene Walter — RP, 1987-1988
Posts: 258
(12/17/01 3:38 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Thanks, O, I really needed that! The funny thing is, I was in a pretty good mood this morning, until I checked in here. Usually visiting here makes me feel BETTER, not worse. I'll keep working on those deep breaths....
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!

Centerfield
May 08 2007 07:32 PM

CookieMom
Jim Lindeman — OF, 1B, 1994
Posts: 436
(12/17/01 4:11 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

No pouting? You mean I have to get over the Turk trade? But it's only been 4 1/2 months!


You Are the True Lord of the Dance - No Matter What Those Idiots At Work Say!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Kurt Abbott — SS, 2B, 2000
Posts: 267
(12/17/01 4:21 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

You reap what you sow, YGB - don't try to foist this on me.

Mom - take it up with edgy, he's the one making all the edicts! As far as I'm concerned, you can pout over Turk all you want.
Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kasey62
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 246
(12/17/01 4:28 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

I don't think the pouting thing is an ACTUAL edict.
I made the comment to try and end the thread with
a little humor but you like to get the last word so the
thread lives. Ever notice I rarely argue with you anymore?

Let's move on.

Well I just wanna have some fun
I probably won't see no money
I just wanna have some fun
'fore they throw me in the sanitarium


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Kurt Abbott — SS, 2B, 2000
Posts: 269
(12/17/01 4:37 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Sorry, KC, but I didn't find much in this thread that was very humorus. I don't recall ever doing anything to offend you, but then it seems that I don't have to do much to be offensive to someone these days. Consider the entire subject dropped.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kasey62
Tony Phillips — OF, 1998
Posts: 247
(12/17/01 4:48 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Well, the Ms. Met is gonna gag on her toast again line was at
least mildly funny. You've never offended me. Frustrated me,
but never offended me. Cheer up dammit.
Well I just wanna have some fun
I probably won't see no money
I just wanna have some fun
'fore they throw me in the sanitarium


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Charlie Puleo — SP, RP, 1981-1982
Posts: 272
(12/17/01 4:54 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Thanks, KC - I appreciate that. And you're right - I forgot about the gagging line. It was mildly funny. Dammit, how do you always manage to get me to laugh in spite of myself?!

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

metsmarathon
Preston Wilson, OF, 1998
Posts: 207
(12/17/01 4:57 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

kc is da man, and much funnier than tony phillips.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CookieMom
Jim Lindeman — OF, 1B, 1994
Posts: 437
(12/17/01 5:06 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

But is he funnier than Lenny Harris?
You Are the True Lord of the Dance - No Matter What Those Idiots At Work Say!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JonathanArcher
Darren Reed, OF, 1990
Posts: 216
(12/17/01 5:08 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Funnier than Lenny Harris - yes
Funnier than CF? - Not in this lifetime

"If Billy Beane can build the kind of team he built in Oakland with a payroll under $40 million, somebody explain to me how come Phillips can't do it for $100 million at Shea?"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CookieMom
Jim Lindeman — OF, 1B, 1994
Posts: 439
(12/17/01 5:09 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Nobody is funnier than CF - he's in a league of his own

You Are the True Lord of the Dance - No Matter What Those Idiots At Work Say!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Centerfield II
Clint Hurdle — C, OF, 3B, 1983, 1985, 1987
Posts: 221
(12/17/01 5:16 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Stop it you two. You're making me blush.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CookieMom
Juan Acevedo — RP, 1997
Posts: 440
(12/17/01 5:21 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Don't you oppress me! I'll do what I damn well please

You Are the True Lord of the Dance - No Matter What Those Idiots At Work Say!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Charlie Puleo — SP, RP, 1981-1982
Posts: 275
(12/17/01 5:25 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

Lenny's good - but KC's better. CF is an acquired taste!

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JonathanArcher
Darren Reed, OF, 1990
Posts: 217
(12/17/01 5:27 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

CF usually hits with a nice clean surgical strike.

"If Billy Beane can build the kind of team he built in Oakland with a payroll under $40 million, somebody explain to me how come Phillips can't do it for $100 million at Shea?"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

metsmarathon
Preston Wilson, OF, 1998
Posts: 208
(12/17/01 5:29 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

cf is funny, but i still aint kissing him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JonathanArcher
Darren Reed, OF, 1990
Posts: 219
(12/17/01 5:30 pm)


Re: So I'm sittin' there minding my own business...

mm - I wouldn't kiss him with your lips.......

"If Billy Beane can build the kind of team he built in Oakland with a payroll under $40 million, somebody explain to me how come Phillips can't do it for $100 million at Shea?"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Junior Ortiz — C, 1983-1984
Posts: 280
(12/17/01 6:19 pm)


Correcting the error of my ways...

I went back and read your response, WBG, and offer this retort:

"
I know that I've read many things over the last several years which have stated that Wilpon was focused on the new stadium


So?"


MM: So, I feel that Wilpon has put his stadium plans ahead of the best interests of the team at times, but that's just my impression - I have nothing solid to back it up.

"and I know that I've watched this team go the budget route instead of going after big names like ARod, Gonzalez, Giambi, etc. will little real explanation except for Wilpon's continued chorus of "we're sticking to our present budget".


First of all you've already said in this thread that 95 million is appropriate for this team. How is that the "budget route"?

How do you know we won't go after Gonzalez? More importanly, how do you know we NEED to?

Giambi wasn't pursued because we don't need a first baseman/DH nor a bidding war with the @#%$. Is that not a "real" explanation?

Arod cost too much, but why not ask Doubleday to be sure."


MM: Had that 95 million been apportioned properly, there could have been more wiggle room. Then again, I admit I don't know squat about the financial operations of this team, but it seems to me that a team situated in one of the biggest markets in the country could've had a better share of top talent than we've had in the last few years.

I don't know we won't go after Gonzalez, which is why I've repeatedly said that I hope Fred Wilpon - to date, the only person in the organization to speak out AGAINST acquiring him - will prove me wrong and get him. I don't know that we specifically need HIM, but I do know damn well that we need to add offense and if you can pick up one of the better bats in the game for less than it might normally take to get him, it behooves you to at least try and do it.

The last time I looked, we needed to offload aging, injury plagued players at BOTH corners of our infield. That means, we could well have used a 1bman. Unfortunately, Todd Zeile's surgery precluded our being able to deal him and pretty much cut us out of the Giambi sweeps. I only brought up Giambi in the first place because it was the @#%$ dealing for him which prompted the articles to which I referred in the beginning of this thread and which I STILL don't agree with.

" I also know that all the reports around the time of the Piazza signing had Nelson Doubleday pushing Steve Phillips to get it done and Fred Wilpon balking at the cost.


Yet, we went and did it anyway and ... imagine ... we find that money's tight. It's possible that Wilpon felt that spreading out that sum over several players would be the better option. Using your argument it would seem that Doubleday is the one saying "Who cares about winning, we have a star attraction.""


MM: Very true - anything is possible. Again, I can only form judgements based upon what little facts I have, and those facts all point toward Wilpon not wanting Mike and Doubleday pushing for him. No-one ever elaborated on either's reasoning on the subject.

"Obviously, any or all of these reports could be wrong, and I could be wrong for believing them, but as I said, I have yet to see anything to the contrary.


Yes you have. You've seen dozens of challenges to your line of thought on this subject from a number of reasonable people. You should also be aware of the oft-repeated statements from SP that Fred could give him flexibility in the event he needed it ~ which to this point, SP hasn't yet."


MM: What I've seen is many challenges to my opinion from other posters on this board with differing opinions. Unless those posters are employees of the Mets front office with more actual information than I have, that doesn't necessarily make them right and me wrong. I'm sorry, but I'm not wrong just because YOU say I am anymore than you're wrong because I say you are - it doesn't work that way. As to Steve Phillips - of course he's going to claim that he could have the flexibility, it gives him a better leg to stand on in negotiations. If he publically admits that he can't go any further financially, there isn't exactly going to be a line of FA's waiting to sign with us, is there? Those particular statements prove nothing other than that SP is a good GM and an even better spin doctor.

"If you want anything more specific, I'm afraid I can't furnish it, which I'm sure makes me wrong as far as most folks are concerned. So be it.

You're wrong not because you can't produce proof -- you're wrong because you made up your mind absent of it, or at least without considering all that is available."


MM: No, actually I did consider all the proof that was available to me and I formed an opinion. The last time I looked, that was my right. As I said above, just because that opinion doesn't jibe with yours doesn't automatically make it wrong. You're not producing any more proof than I am - we're both looking at the same amount of information and deciding differently - that's our right.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!


Edited by: Ms Met II at: 12/17/01 6:08:25 pm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wide BeeGee
Fernando Viña — 2B, 3B, SS, OF, 1994
Posts: 163
(12/17/01 11:46 pm)


Re: Correcting the error of my ways...

As I said above, just because that opinion doesn't jibe with yours doesn't automatically make it wrong.

I don't have an opinion on this subject.

My issue is with your belief in forming opinions on topics you know next to nothing about.

You're not producing any more proof than I am - we're both looking at the same amount of information and deciding differently - that's our right.

I haven't decided a thing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Salamander Q
Administrator & Newt
Posts: 261
(12/18/01 12:03 am)


You're so full of crap, WBG...

You do so have an opinion. How do you know I don't have proof? Prove that, if you're so smart. I have every right to have an opinion on a subject on which (sez you) I know nothing. I know a lot of things, and I'm sorry but I'm not taking your guff denying me the right to argue that my opinions are valid merely because they're my opinions. I work hard to come to my conclusions--some weeks I invest a half-hour in thinking rationally-- so I'm not going to just give up my opinions because some pointyhead shows me a few devastating contradictions in my posts. Look, I respect your carefullyconsidered, well-reasoned posts, so why can't you just accept (and R-E-S-P-E-C-T, dammit) my irrational jibberings? I don't get you. Peace between our warring tribes, and goodwill and blessings to you and yours.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kasey62
Gene Walter — RP, 1987-1988
Posts: 250
(12/18/01 8:08 am)


Re: You're so full of crap, WBG...

--some weeks I invest a half-hour in thinking rationally--

Stop, quit it.

Well I just wanna have some fun
I probably won't see no money
I just wanna have some fun
'fore they throw me in the sanitarium

Centerfield
May 08 2007 07:35 PM

Salamander Q
Administrator & Newt
Posts: 270
(12/18/01 9:16 am)


Re: You're so full of crap, WBG...

You want me to stop thinking rationally altogether? OK, I can do that, chief.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ms Met II
Luis Rivera — SS, 2B, 1994
Posts: 300
(12/18/01 1:10 pm)


Well, just so long as your keeping an open mind WBG...

"As I said above, just because that opinion doesn't jibe with yours doesn't automatically make it wrong.


I don't have an opinion on this subject.

My issue is with your belief in forming opinions on topics you know next to nothing about."


MM: And my issue is with your assuming that anyone who forms an opinion you don't agree with knows nothing. You have no more knolwedge of the topic than I do, so what the hell makes you so intellectually superior?

"You're not producing any more proof than I am - we're both looking at the same amount of information and deciding differently - that's our right.


I haven't decided a thing."


MM: Except that I know "next to nothing" because I don't deign to agree with you. You have no problem deciding that.

I tried to give you what you want - a considered response to your points. I thought I could expect the same in return - guess I was asking for too much.

Like soldier's in the winter's night with a vow to defend
No retreat and baby...NO SURRENDER!

Frayed Knot
May 08 2007 08:16 PM

That LF guy was always such a fucking troublemaker.

Centerfield
May 08 2007 08:38 PM

LF wrote:
I have much trouble following you at times.


It's funny how you sum up her entire posting career with that one line.