Master Index of Archived Threads
Wallace Matthews Spits in Glavine's Champagne (split)
metirish Aug 06 2007 07:09 AM |
Wally does his best to dampen the mood.
|
Edgy DC Aug 06 2007 07:26 AM |
He lived in Connecticut? What a bastard!
|
Kid Carsey Aug 06 2007 07:29 AM |
I stopped here ...
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 06 2007 07:37 AM |
I'm not even going to bother reading it, and that excerpt that KC just posted shows me that I'm not missing anything.
|
metirish Aug 06 2007 07:44 AM |
Wally uses the fact that his family never did move away from Atlanta as proof,does Kenny Loftons family move every time he gets traded or signs with a different team....fuckin stupid stuff.
|
SteveJRogers Aug 06 2007 09:18 AM |
|
The Reds put Tom Seaver in their HOF (there are stats to back up that induction) and fans gave him a warm reception. I'm sure if the White Sox ever brought him back in a "Lets Honor Those Who Obtain Great Achievements As A Chi Sox" day Seaver would be treated warmly. They know he has a scripted interlocking NY on his HOF cap and that he will always be known for his Met days and will never be known as a Red or a White Sox, no matter how many times his no-hitter, 3,000th K or 300th win are shown. And Lord knows I doubt he ever actually changed his main residency from CT or California to Cincy or Chicago. Just because a player is known for another city shouldn't affect how a stop on the road feels about him unless it wasn't memorable at all or circumstances cause the player's time in the city to be one hiddeous experience (Alomar, Roberto for example) If Met fans want to soak up in having someone do something like that in a Met uni why the heck not. Look at it this way, I'm sure Wally is one of those lamenting the fact that Gwynn and Ripken were the last of a dying breed, if that is the case then no future accomplishment outside of Derek Jeter's 3,000 hit as a Yankee or Bonds record breaking homer as a Giant should be celebrated by the fans of whomever's laundry the player is playing for. Come on, give me a break. Once you become an entry on the All-Time Roster or your name gets printed in a media guide as a Met employee you are and always will be associated with the New York Mets organization. Or any organization for that matter, course as in Glavine's case he is still looked upon less than fondly for several reasons by Met fans, though most have to do with his lack of effectivness and percieved whinning when things haven't gone his way more often than not rather than his Brave heritage, but he still is a member of the Mets family and if fans and the organization want to embrace his accomplishment and treat him warmly then that is their progative. That kind of attitude of Wally and others is quite cynical and reeks of someone being a party pooper for the sake of being one.
|
Edgy DC Aug 06 2007 09:45 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Aug 06 2007 11:17 AM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's an easy enough article to write:
|
Rockin' Doc Aug 06 2007 11:14 AM |
I congratulate Glavine on his outstanding career and his 300th victory. He will certainly be enshrined in Cooperstown someday and he should go in as a Brave. As long as he plays hard and gives his best effort while playing for the Mets (which I have no doubt he has done so), then I will pull for him to do well. Hell, I hope he wins 7 or 8 more games this season.
|
metsguyinmichigan Aug 06 2007 11:15 AM |
"But the fact is, Glavine has never really looked comfortable in a Mets uniform and you've never been fully comfortable with him wearing one."
|
Rockin' Doc Aug 06 2007 11:34 AM |
"But the fact is, Glavine has never really looked comfortable in a Mets uniform and you've never been fully comfortable with him wearing one."
|
seawolf17 Aug 06 2007 11:35 AM |
See, Edgy? Exactly the same.
|
SteveJRogers Aug 06 2007 12:26 PM |
Just to show where Wally is coming from, when the Knicks retired Patrick Ewing's 33 a couple of years ago Wally remarked about the hypocrasy of the fans giving him a standing O and treating him as a legend based soley on callers to his show and talk radio as well as newspaper letter writers ripping him for never winning a championship, being a surly ahole who never did embrace the city and its fans and forcing a trade out of town that the Knicks haven't recovered from because he wouldn't accept a non-main guy role on the team.
|
Edgy DC Aug 06 2007 12:30 PM |
I can't figure out Steve's opinion there.
|
Elster88 Aug 06 2007 12:39 PM |
That surprises you?
|
SteveJRogers Aug 06 2007 12:46 PM |
Wally went out of his way to rip Knick fans showering Ewing with affection that fitted his time in New York based on "Knick" fans hating on Ewing through radio/tv talk show calls and newspaper letter writers, especially the last few years of his time in New York.
|
DocTee Aug 06 2007 12:53 PM |
My head hurts from that run-on and my eyes do too and I don't mean metaphorically I mean they actually hurt from trying to interject punctuation into those posts and being able to read them and make sense of all that too
|
SteveJRogers Aug 06 2007 12:58 PM |
Wally went out of his way to rip Knick fans showering Ewing with affection that fitted his time in New York.
|
Edgy DC Aug 06 2007 01:22 PM |
I'm going to agree that it's the run-ons that that make reading Steve's post difficult.
|
Vic Sage Aug 06 2007 01:37 PM |
gee, i got the opposite from Steve's post (showing how badly phrased it is). That is, he understands why Matthews dogged Knicks fans for celebrating Ewing, but thinks Matthews failed to understand that fans had a right to celebrate the good times Ewing had, and had a right not to turn it into a Bonds-ian hatefest, whatever Ewing did or didn't do during his Knicks tenure.
|
G-Fafif Aug 06 2007 01:42 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Aug 06 2007 01:56 PM |
|||
It must be awesome to be Wally Matthews and get paid to write the first 800 nonsensical words that come into your head. 1) The statistics...as Edgy helpfully outlined them. 2) The postseason...you make three postseasons starts (and pitch very well in two of them) for a team that's been in the postseason seven times, you are a reasonably significant part of that team's history. 3) Two All-Star berths, neither of the "crap, we need to name a Royal" variety, indicate you were one of the better players on your team twice. 4) Though it made me cringe circa 2003, the Mets have made Tom Glavine one of the faces of their franchise. He may not be true blue and all that, but who is? 5) What a fucking idiot. He's actually made me rush to the defense of Tom Glavine. And quit kicking around Warren Spahn, you numbskull. His half-season as a Met pitcher and pitching coach wasn't a raging success but it gave us this crucial episode in the development of Frank Edwin McGraw as captured in this passage from Screwball reflecting on what happened when Tug forgot to bring his "baseball hat" on his first road trip and his baseball shoes on his next:
|
Vic Sage Aug 06 2007 01:49 PM |
|
he was? That was so shellfish of him.
|
G-Fafif Aug 06 2007 01:56 PM |
Too Shea. And fixed.
|
SteveJRogers Aug 06 2007 02:10 PM |
Matthews is also the same guy who thought Yogi Berra was being a "fake, phony, fraud" for burying the hatchet with Steinbrenner back in 1999.
|
Willets Point Aug 06 2007 02:17 PM |
|
Greg wins this thread!
|
Farmer Ted Aug 06 2007 02:29 PM |
Feel free to rant.
|
Edgy DC Aug 06 2007 02:38 PM |
That rip on Ian O'Conner is funny as hell.
|
DocTee Aug 06 2007 03:44 PM |
Joe's wikipedia page has already been updated to reflect his most recent gaffe.
|
TheOldMole Aug 06 2007 05:22 PM |
Glavine is a Met, and beloved.
|
Elster88 Aug 06 2007 08:08 PM |
avi
|
MFS62 Aug 07 2007 08:45 AM |
I'm going on record right now to predict that when both New York ballparks are completed, Matthews will like the new Yankee Stadium and write at least one column about "what a poor excuse for a new ballpark" the new Mets' home is.
|
SteveJRogers Aug 07 2007 09:22 PM |
Part of my point also was that Matthews rationalized his belief that Knick fans were hypocritical in their treatment of Ewing based on calls to radio shows, and whatever he could gleam from letters to the papers.
|