Master Index of Archived Threads


Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Valadius Sep 10 2007 11:51 PM

The title for the fourth Indiana Jones movie has just been announced: "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". It opens in theaters on May 22, 2008.

Elster88 Sep 11 2007 05:03 PM

RMPL

Nymr83 Sep 11 2007 06:57 PM

i know i'm the predictor of doom and gloom for sequels so here i go again: this movie wont live up to its predecessors and the enormous hype it will receive, people will be leaving the theaters as disappointed as they were after Star Trek V.

Centerfield Sep 12 2007 09:05 AM

Having Spielberg and Harrison Ford involved gives me hope for this one. I hope they will be enough to counteract the Lucas factor.

Valadius Sep 12 2007 01:21 PM

There's the promotional image for the title Old Indy Spielberg with the cast: Shia LaBeouf (playing Indy's son, presumably by Marion Ravenwood), Ray Winstone, Karen Allen, and Harrison Ford

Willets Point Sep 12 2007 01:33 PM

Mmmm...Karen Allen.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 12 2007 01:49 PM

Yeah, she still looks terrific. And I got an unexpected kick out of seeing Harrison Ford, at his current age, in his old Indy outfit. I still dress like I did twenty years ago, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Indiana Jones does too.

Johnny Dickshot Sep 12 2007 01:49 PM

She's gotta be 60, WP

Centerfield Sep 12 2007 01:55 PM

She hasn't been in any of the movies since Raiders right?

Benjamin Grimm Sep 12 2007 01:57 PM

She'll be 56 in a few weeks... http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000261/

Willets Point Sep 12 2007 01:58 PM

Ageist. She still looks good. And she's been in plenty of movies since Raiders of the Lost Ark. IMDB.

Vic Sage Sep 12 2007 02:50 PM

her career was great early, but fell off rapidly and deeply. In the 7-year period from 1978 - 1984, she had major roles in 6 excellent films: ANIMAL HOUSE (78) THE WANDERERS (79) SMALL CIRCLE OF FRIENDS (80) RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK (81) SHOOT THE MOON (82) STARMAN (84) And then.... nothing good for nearly 10 years, until her supporting role in the excellent baseball movie, THE SANDLOT (93). Since then, nothing of interest. She still works, but not in things that are either successful or even visible. She was never a great actress, but she definitely had a certain ... something. After establishing herself as a grownup romantic lead in the excellent STARMAN, she made some bad career choices. Then, she had to wait until she aged into "mom" roles. She should have had a better manager, like "E".

sharpie Sep 13 2007 07:50 AM

She had a supporting role in IN THE BEDROOM, a good movie. Some people liked A PERFECT STORM, the year before. Since then, yes, nothing. I once saw her walking down 16th Street. A great moment. This new movie has 14 syllables in the title. A mouthful.

Benjamin Grimm Sep 13 2007 08:06 AM

14 syllables is nothing, compared to what Borat's movie had.

Willets Point Sep 13 2007 08:14 AM

So I take it this movie will be set some time in the 1950's when Indiana Jones is approximately the same age that Harrison Ford is now? Not that Ford/Jones have ever had a 1-to-1 age matchup since that would make Indiana Jones 42 in 1935, 39 in 1936, and 47 in 1938.

Edgy MD Sep 13 2007 08:21 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Sep 13 2007 08:49 AM

I'll call the Sandlot less than excellent, and her role kinda odd, married to the visibly younger Denis Leary. At 56, why not let her chase Indy around? Better than sticking him with Julia Stiles or Thora Birch some shit.

Valadius Sep 13 2007 08:48 AM

Yeah, it's set some time in the 1950's.

Edgy MD Sep 13 2007 08:51 AM

Will he be racing for artifacts against those insidious North Koreans?

Centerfield Sep 13 2007 11:30 AM

Willets Point wrote: Ageist. She still looks good. And she's been in plenty of movies since Raiders of the Lost Ark. IMDB. Sorry. I meant Indiana Jones movies.

Valadius Sep 13 2007 12:27 PM

The Soviets have replaced the Nazis as the bad guys in this movie. Some tidbits that I know: There is a motorcycle chase through 1950's New Haven. There may be Russian tanks in the movie. Part of the movie takes place in Mexico/Central America. Cate Blanchett and John Hurt are also in the movie. Both sides in the Cold War are after Indiana Jones' expertise regarding a really big archaeological find.

Willets Point Feb 20 2008 12:12 AM

Chocolate-covered awesomeness:

Farmer Ted Feb 20 2008 12:26 PM

Speaking of Karen Allen, I caught a radio interview with Mark Metcalf (Neidermeyer in Animal House) last week. He was on one of those syndicated morning shows. While filming Animal House, all the guys, from Belushi down to the piss boys, were trying to get with Allen but she wouldn't have any part of it. Then Donald Sutherland flies up to Oregon for the filming, stays there less than 36 hours for his parts, and gets the girl. Other tid bits from Animal House, other than Sutherland banging Allen: Neidermeyer's horse was a "Silver." It was one of a few Clayton Moore (The Lone Ranger) would ride on for public appearances (i.e., parades, etc.) The ROTC helmet worn by Metcalf during Animal House was an actual helmet worn by George C. Scott in Patton.

Willets Point Feb 20 2008 01:01 PM

Farmer Ted wrote: Then Donald Sutherland flies up to Oregon for the filming, stays there less than 36 hours for his parts, and gets the girl. So impressive that they wrote it into the script.

themetfairy Feb 20 2008 01:25 PM

I thought that Karen Allen was living with Stephen Bishop ("On and On") at the time, which is why he got the bit part in the movie as the guy singing on the stairs during the toga party.

Farmer Ted Feb 20 2008 01:38 PM

Sutherland appears to have been one stealth, dope smoking professor.

metirish May 22 2008 10:26 AM

DocTee May 23 2008 06:02 PM

Saw this yesterday-- the best part for me was the nostalgia...definitely a pale comparison to its predecessors, but there were worse ways to spend two hours.

Elster88 May 26 2008 08:50 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on May 26 2008 08:53 PM

Nymr83 wrote: i know i'm the predictor of doom and gloom for sequels so here i go again: this movie wont live up to its predecessors and the enormous hype it will receive, people will be leaving the theaters as disappointed as they were after Star Trek V. But Star Trek VI was great! I'm glad that your prediction came out wrong. I liked the movie. And it really didn't get that much hype. Certainly nothing compared to Spiderman II or the Star Wars prequels.

Elster88 May 26 2008 08:50 PM

Benjamin Grimm wrote: Yeah, she still looks terrific. Not quite.

AG/DC May 26 2008 09:38 PM

Eh, summat disappointing. Hard to suspend disbelief during the first third, but I get on board eventually, I guess. Harry is an old guy. Long in tooth.

smg58 May 27 2008 05:06 AM

A little too silly at points (going through a succession of waterfallls completely unscathed, for example), but still a lot of fun.

Vince Coleman Firecracker Jun 09 2008 09:28 AM

Was it just me, or was there some seriously terrible looking CG in this movie?

Willets Point Jun 09 2008 09:56 AM

Vince Coleman Firecracker wrote: Was it just me, or was there some seriously terrible looking CG in this movie? I find CGI terrible-looking in general.

TransMonk Jun 21 2008 08:09 PM

Willets Point wrote: Vince Coleman Firecracker wrote: Was it just me, or was there some seriously terrible looking CG in this movie? I find CGI terrible-looking in general. Yup. Saw this today...found it pretty horrible. I hate CGI unless it's part of some fantasy thing that they just can't recreate (and even then it's wrong and annoying, but I guess I understand the ease of it). But scorpions? Fire ants? Trees? This movie was half animation. I should have just gone to see Kung-Fu Panda. The script was bad, Ford is old and even Spielberg seemed to mail it in. Expected, but still disappointing.

Elster88 Jun 22 2008 02:12 PM

I disagree.

Valadius Jun 29 2008 06:24 PM

I thought it was good. Certainly much better than Temple of Doom.

Nymr83 Jun 29 2008 09:58 PM

way to start a movie thread without a poll