Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Glavine Coming Back for Another Season?

Do You Want Glavine Back as a NY Met?
Yes I want him back as a Mets player. 16 votes
No I don not want him back as a Mets player. 4 votes

metirish
Sep 11 2007 10:14 AM

Here's the article,I vote for him back as a Mets player.

]

NEW YORK -- New York Mets left-hander Tom Glavine is still having fun playing baseball and wants to return for a 22nd major league season in 2008, the New York Post reported.

Tom Glavine

Glavine
"I'm having as much fun as I've had in a long time, and that's a big factor for me,'' Glavine, 41, told the Post. "It's a fun team to come to the ballpark with every day. All the factors are there [to come back].''

Glavine, who won his 300th game on Aug. 5, says he has two criteria for returning next season -- how well he's pitching and how he's feeling physically. "That's the question I have to wait and see, but as far as going out there and having fun and doing the things I have to do to be successful, there's been nothing there that makes me think I am going to walk away," he told the Post.

And as much as Glavine wants to spend more time with his family, he says his wife and their four children, aged 6 to 13, support another season.

"Surprisingly, my kids are more on the side of me playing next year than not. I think that is in large part because they understand what I am doing," Glavine said, according to the Post. "They enjoy coming to the ballpark and being around the guys. They like the game of baseball. I think they are really starting to figure out that, 'Dad's a Major League Baseball player and it's pretty fun going to the games.'"

Glavine is 13-6 with a 3.95 ERA this season and has 303 career wins, currently 21st all-time. Only three other left-handers have more wins than Glavine: Warren Spahn (363), Steve Carlton (329) and Eddie Plank (326).

Benjamin Grimm
Sep 11 2007 10:30 AM

I'd also like to see him come back.

RealityChuck
Sep 11 2007 10:32 AM

I'd like to see him again; he's a class act and still can pitch.

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 10:33 AM
Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Sep 11 2007 10:36 AM

His $9 million option has alread vested for 2008. It has a $3 milllion buyout, so that's a lot of lettuce for him to walk away from.

Another note about his option: His salary increases by $1 million for every 10 innings he throws over 160 in 2007. He's been his normal healthy self this year and has already thrown 180 innings, bumping him up to $11 million for 2008, and, well, that buyout looks a lot better when you guess we're looking at, yikes, maybe $13 mills if he continues to take his starts and throw 6-7 until the end of the season.

metirish
Sep 11 2007 10:33 AM

I'm assuming that Glavine means coming back as a Mets player,I think anyway.


Just to add to what Edgy posted.....Glavine can decline the players option if it becomes guaranteed,which of course it did once 160 innings were reached.

soupcan
Sep 11 2007 10:44 AM

If he can win 15 games why not?

Valadius
Sep 11 2007 10:45 AM

I would absolutely love to see him back next season in a Mets uniform. He's still a good major league pitcher and, as Chuck said, a class act.

metirish
Sep 11 2007 10:54 AM

Coming to a book store near you.


]

Feinstein, Moose & Glav

John Feinstein, the wonderful author of the unforgettable 1987 best-seller "A Season on the Brink," about coach Bobby Knight and the champion University of Indiana Hoosiers, has been on the Glavine-Mike Mussina trail for nearly a year now, picking the pitchers' brains for a book about them to be released before the 2008 season.

The following is my interview with Feinstein about this project and these two intriguing figures.

When did you come up with this book?

Actually, the concept came to me in 1999. I wanted to write a book about pitching, using someone who was not only great at doing it but who was also really smart, who could describe what he does and how he got to be so great.

My original choice was David Cone. I thought he'd be perfect. But, unfortunately for me, I ultimately learned that he already had a commitment to do a book with (the famous "New Yorker" writer) Roger Angell.

I then revisited the concept this winter and boiled it down to four pitchers: Glavine, Mussina, John Smoltz and Jamie Moyer. I eventually decided on Tom and Mike. I knew them both very well and I liked the idea of one Met and one Yankee, one lefty and one righty, both fairly deep into their careers, and who made huge changes by signing with New York teams — and, for a time, struggled, Tom more on the mound, Mike more in the clubhouse.

Were they immediately receptive

to doing it?

Tom was much easier to sell. Mike had a lot of questions, such as: "How much time will this involve?" and "How often will you need to see me?" Mike is very careful. I needed to talk to him three, four times until he agreed. But once he committed to it, he was terrific.

What have you learned about them?

Well, they both have sneaky senses of humor. Tom is very dry, while Mike is razor sharp. Mike has a T-shirt that sums him up totally; on top, it reads, "National Sarcasm Society," but underneath reads the line: "Like we really need your support."

Tom is more easy-going; I can talk to him before one of his starts and he doesn't mind at all. But if you try that with Mike, he might bark at you.

Both have really good memories, although Mike is more precise, knows his career down to the exact numbers.

Their approaches are different, though. Like Tom has never had trouble working with a catcher. In fact, Lo Duca told me that Tom is the easiest pitcher he's ever worked with, that Tom has shaken him off just one time in two years. On the other hand, Mike will shake off his catcher around 50 percent of the time.

Who's the smarter one?

Funny you should ask that. I joked with Tom one day that I thought Mike was smarter than he is, and Tom, in typical fashion, laughed and agreed.

But the truth is, there is no smarter pitcher than Glavine in the game and if the Mets young pitchers have any smarts they will follow him around and learn from him, everything from how to throw a proper bullpen to how to throw the perfect breaking ball.

In fact, Jamie Moyer told me that for years he carried a videotape around of Glavine's Game 6 clincher in the 1995 World Series (a one-hitter over eight innings), that he considered it the definitive game of a lefty who doesn't throw hard but was as close to perfect as anyone can be.

Are you interviewing only Glavine and Mussina for this book?

Not at all. Paul Lo Duca (who will go through Tom's 300th win pitch by pitch), Rick Peterson, Jorge Posada, Joe Torre, Ron Guidry and Willie Randolph, among others, will play roles in the book. I talked to all the important people in these pitchers' lives. There's a lot of back story, which is what I've always done in my books.

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 11:02 AM

I want pitching smarts, I want to hear from Pedro.

TheOldMole
Sep 11 2007 12:29 PM

There can't be two smart pitchers?

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 12:42 PM

There's quite a few more, but only two made the book.

I'm also a little Tim Leary by only white ones making the shortlist for the book.

Mendoza Line
Sep 11 2007 12:56 PM

I was going to say "no", but the alternatives look like (a) overpaying in a weak free agent market, (b) having two of Pelfrey, Humber, and Mulvey in the 2008 rotation, and (c) trading for a better pitcher, which would probably cost us one of the three pitching prospects plus Milledge (or maybe Gomez).

If those are the choices, I'm all in favor of paying Glavine $13M for class, brains, and mediocre 2008 numbers (and if we get lucky and he gives us the same numbers he's giving us in 2007, even better).

Johnny Dickshot
Sep 11 2007 12:56 PM

hail!

sharpie
Sep 11 2007 12:57 PM

Hail!

Valadius
Sep 11 2007 12:59 PM

Hail!

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 01:06 PM

Yes, hail!

Nymr83
Sep 11 2007 01:36 PM

i think you might as well bring him back, as long as it just for next year and not a longer commitment. the crop of free agent pitchers is very weak this year

seawolf17
Sep 11 2007 01:42 PM

Hail!

DocTee
Sep 11 2007 01:55 PM

hail hail

soupcan
Sep 11 2007 02:05 PM

Hail!

Willets Point
Sep 11 2007 02:07 PM

Nymr83 wrote:
the crop of free agent pitchers is very weak this year


Too bad Mets management didn't take that into consideration LAST offseason. The "overpriced" FA pitchers available then may look cheaper from a cost-benefit perspective of trying to patch together a rotation for 2008 and beyond.

Benjamin Grimm
Sep 11 2007 02:11 PM

I don't remember who those guys were, other than Zito, and it would take a heckuva lot to make HIS deal look cheap.

I think the Mets may not have to worry too much about starting pitching this winter. If Glavine comes back, he'll join Pedro, Hernandez, Maine, Perez, and Pelfrey. With those six guys, you have the makings of a pretty good rotation, even considering the ages of the first three guys.

Nymr83
Sep 11 2007 02:13 PM

i think they were still overpriced and more importantly not effective. the Giants WILL regret the length of the Zito deal if they don't already. Schmidt is on the operating table.
The Mets did just fine putting a rotation together this year even if the 5th spot has been in flux all season.
Giving out bad deals longer than a year is what could kill a team (other than the yankees who can just send Kei Igawa's 45 million to the minors after a month!) I'd rather re-sign a Glavine for 1 year than give 5 years to a guy who probably doesnt deserve them just because he's the best on the weak market.

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 02:29 PM

Nymr83 wrote:
i think they were still overpriced and more importantly not effective. the Giants WILL regret the length of the Zito deal if they don't already.


I'm voting already. In fact, I'm voting for the last four months.

Nymr83 wrote:
Schmidt is on the operating table.


Word up, Cameo.

Nymr83 wrote:
The Mets did just fine putting a rotation together this year even if the 5th spot has been in flux all season.


Hard to dispute.

Nymr83 wrote:
Giving out bad deals longer than a year is what could kill a team (other than the yankees who can just send Kei Igawa's 45 million to the minors after a month!) I'd rather re-sign a Glavine for 1 year than give 5 years to a guy who probably doesnt deserve them just because he's the best on the weak market.


Going over three on pitchers hurts also.

Hard to look forward with this pitching staff and not be optimisitic. They have eight options to start in the post season, and the only one they don't retain the rights to next season is Brian Lawrence --- the least of them. (Is Sosa an automatic FA? That would be two.) Next year Humber and Mulvey become viable candidates as well.

Valadius
Sep 11 2007 04:39 PM

Our rotation, as it's composed right now (Martinez, Glavine, Hernandez, Maine, Perez) is the best it has been in a pretty long time. We have plenty of time for Pelfrey, Humber, and Mulvey to develop and slot in for the first three.

Edgy DC
Sep 11 2007 05:10 PM

Eight. We have eight funking starting pitchers available.

With Humber and Sele, we have ten in a pinch. Six of them have a better ERA and ERA+ than Barry Zito.

Rockin' Doc
Sep 11 2007 05:57 PM

Hail yes, I say that Glavine should be retained for one final season in 2008.

metsguyinmichigan
Sep 11 2007 09:07 PM

HAIL!!!!!

Zvon
Sep 11 2007 09:31 PM



Hellzyea, Id like to see Glavine pitch for NY, if he continues pitching.

As far as the $$$ involved, I dont care about that side of the equation.
Thats baseball business and to me, its still a game.