Master Index of Archived Threads
Topics for the Parody Challenge
How do we do this?
Wide range of topics, as traditional, limited to players. | 5 votes |
Wide range of topics, as traditional, but expanded beyond players. | 7 votes |
Narrow range of topics, as currently suggested, limited to players. | 1 votes |
Narrow range of topics, as currently suggested, expanded beyond players. | 2 votes |
Edgy DC Nov 27 2007 07:32 AM |
We need to build some consensus.
|
Benjamin Grimm Nov 27 2007 07:55 AM |
The other rule change that was put on the table involved both combatants working with the same subject.
|
sharpie Nov 27 2007 08:03 AM |
I'm for a wide range expanded beyond players with both players working on the same subject. Not sure that is quite a category. If this doesn't work we can always go back to a different method next year.
|
Edgy DC Nov 27 2007 08:16 AM |
I think consensus is strong on both players hitting the same theme.
|
sharpie Nov 27 2007 10:12 AM |
What if we did it by rounds. For instance, Round 1 could be players; Round 2 could be managers, coaches and broadcasters; Round 3 could be seasons, etc.
|
Edgy DC Nov 27 2007 10:20 AM |
Eh, it's got a game-show appeal, but I don't think we'll know how many rounds we'll have until we see the playing field.
|
sharpie Nov 27 2007 10:22 AM |
I see great potential in Jiggs McDonald.
|
Willets Point Nov 27 2007 01:24 PM Re: Topics for the Parody Challenge |
|
Consensus and majority-wins voting are actually antithetical to one another.
|
G-Fafif Nov 27 2007 02:18 PM |
What were the previous parameters-- that is, how did this work in the past? I was amused by many of the parodies last year but was mystified as to how the topics were arrived at.
|
Edgy DC Nov 27 2007 02:22 PM |
We take the 500 top Mets and assign them random numbers.
|