Master Index of Archived Threads
A Big CPF "Welcome Back" to Audrey Mulholland!
bmfc1 Dec 08 2007 09:02 AM |
Letter to the Editor, [u:1e5a7d6bb5]The Washington Post[/u:1e5a7d6bb5], 12-08-07:
|
SteveJRogers Dec 08 2007 11:14 AM |
Okay Audrey lets see;
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 08 2007 11:20 AM |
Be quiet Rogers
|
SteveJRogers Dec 08 2007 11:49 AM |
Come to think of it, I'm surprised she didn't reference Lastings Milledge's transgressions as another member of the "element" that she puts Dukes in.
|
OlerudOwned Dec 08 2007 02:01 PM |
Yeah, remember that time Milledge threatened to kill his girlfriend? That was nuts!
|
SteveJRogers Dec 08 2007 02:16 PM |
|
Yeah I know murder threats and statutory rapes are quite different and it was one incident as opposed to a full rap sheet, but Milledge did rape an underage girl and one would suspect that the author of the letter would hold that against rooting for Milledge, even with it being the only known actual crime on his record.
|
metsguyinmichigan Dec 08 2007 02:16 PM |
Steve wrote: |
Benjamin Grimm Dec 08 2007 02:30 PM |
|
He had sex, as a teenager, with a teenager. That hardly makes him a rapist.
|
SteveJRogers Dec 08 2007 02:39 PM |
Fair point MGIM, but no doubt Met fans have had the same "How could you root for..." questions about the players listed, and pretty much the majority of people listed that got booted were booted more so for baseball reasons (diminishing talent, salery dump, ect) as opposed to their off the field transgressions.
|
Kid Carsey Dec 08 2007 03:40 PM |
mgim: >>>Fact of the matter is that we purge our people who cause such problems<<<
|
OlerudOwned Dec 08 2007 03:59 PM |
||
Thanks for verbalizing that for me. I was trying to figure out how I could convey the sound of me slamming my head against the wall into a post.
|
metsguyinmichigan Dec 08 2007 04:08 PM |
|
Valid point. I was over the top.
|
SteveJRogers Dec 08 2007 04:22 PM |
Which reminds me, he, Milledge, has been traded for someone who essentially has the same feelings about people who are different than he is as John Rocker, only he had the good sense not to ramble on and on, and on to someone doing a profile on him.
|
Edgy DC Dec 08 2007 07:00 PM |
|
No he wasn't, Steve. Stop it. You have about a half dozen facts wrong or grossly distorted to make a lost point. Threatening to murder his wife, Steve. A woman has every right to place that beyond the pale of her tolerance. You equate that with Alfonzo maybe taking steroids, based on your speculation.
|
Edgy DC Dec 08 2007 07:09 PM |
I re-read. More than half a dozen.
|
MFS62 Dec 08 2007 07:21 PM |
I can't believe Vince intentionally threw the firecracker into the crowd.
|
Elster88 Dec 08 2007 07:50 PM |
Shut up rogers.
|
metsmarathon Dec 08 2007 08:22 PM |
ryan church expressing a belief that non christians might have a hard time getting into (christian) heaven and that it might be a good thing to do to enlighten them of that, is hardly the same as a) hating non christians and b) threatening to murder your wife.
|
Valadius Dec 08 2007 09:12 PM |
Elijah Dukes is a psychopathic drug addict. Milledge had sex. They're nowhere NEAR the same.
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 09 2007 05:20 AM |
|
That's 'cause you're not doing it right.
|
G-Fafif Dec 09 2007 11:13 AM |
You care for Elijah Dukes little, dear Audrey
|
SteveJRogers Dec 09 2007 02:47 PM |
|
No, the point I was making is that all franchises, heck all forms of entertainment, have people who you root for that have skeletons of various degrees. I didn't even say any of the stuff I mentioned was on the same level, what I was saying is that the Mets have plenty of examples where non-fans can point to you as a Met fan and say "How can you root for..." My response to her, lost in what I got wrong with the specific cases, is that you root for the uniform if you truely are a passionate fan. Billy Martin once said he'd play Hitler and Mussolini if they could help his team win. Fans feel the same way. And you know how to reply to "How can you root for..." questions? Simple, you say that you don't root for that particular player. You root for the laundry. You root harder for the players who fit your particular image of what a player should be as a person. Perhaps you root hard for the day the POS is finally off the roster, or perhaps you root for that POS in terms of maybe, just maybe the setting that your team has may be the right setting to turn his life around for the better (maybe Bowden knows something here, maybe a Manny Acta type would be just the influence Dukes needs, who knows). To me its a superficial reason for dumping a team for another, even if you rooted for that team in the past. Or maybe her like for the Nats wasn't that strong to begin with, I don't know, I don't know her so obviously I can't say. But to me just because the Nats brought in a poor excuse for a human being, is not a strong enough reason to dump the Nats completely.
|
metsmarathon Dec 09 2007 03:00 PM |
||
ah, but its in the degree where your point is lost. if hitler really was a met, you'd root for him?
|
Edgy DC Dec 09 2007 03:04 PM |
|
I don't care, Steve. You've bent every fact available to suit your agenda. It's the irresponsible hack work of every sports journalist we criticize here (only far worse), and it's intolerable from a member. If you want to be a journalist, you should know better than to insult people's intelligence and think they're just going to swallow it.
|
Kid Carsey Dec 09 2007 03:21 PM |
SJR: >>>Billy Martin once said he'd play Hitler and Mussolini if they could help his team win<<<
|
Edgy DC Dec 09 2007 03:48 PM |
Steve, if you want to root for the Yankees, Hitler, and Mussolini, go ahead. We'd both apparently be happier.
|
SteveJRogers Dec 09 2007 03:50 PM |
|||||
Vince Coleman threw firecrackers into a crowd, injuring a young girl
Bret Saberhagen squirted bleach at a bunch of sports writers and injured one of them Ironically Sabes coming clean (no pun intended) is mentioned in this Times article the same day that Coleman was arraigned for the Dodger Stadium incident. I could have sworn one was injured, but I'll own up to that as shoddy research. Vince Coleman may or may not have beheading a cat I'll give you the shoddy edit job, but I did throw in the "may or may not" caveat since Mitchell has denined the incident took place, and Gooden actually denies telling it to Klapish when they were writing the book. There are countless tales of Gooden and Strawberry's history of possible spousal abuse to say nothing of their battles with their demons, which BTW doesn't just hurt the addict but the addict's family and friends as well. Doc: [url]http://www.menstuff.org/issues/byissue/domesticviolencenb.html[/url]
Straw: [url]http://www.mitchellmoss.com/oped/96-10-21-nyobserver.html[/url]
And books have been written chronicling both of their battles with substance abuses. A case can be made that Carlos Delgado's stance against God Bless America and the National Anthem is hypocritical and Un-American considering since 2005 he has been working in the United States, and therefore he is not a person worthy of anyone's affection. I only said a case can be made by those who have a certain polticial agenda with his getting an American paycheck being the basis for it, nothing factual about this one. Guillermo Mota WAS suspended for steroids and wound up being resigned by the Mets This is a fact, Mota was suspended first, then the Mets signed him. The Mets have had their fair share of players have whispers of PED usage including such fan favorites like Len Dykstra, Howard Johnson, Todd Hundley, Mike Piazza and Edgardo Alfonzo More conjecture based on the same conjecture that Met fans use against Jeff Bagwell, Luis Gonzalez, ect, ect, ect. I mention that because that is the way fans tend to rationalize things, "oh our guys don't do those things." There is a reason the book was called "The Bad Guys Won" and that a clique of that team is referred to as "The Scum Bunch" Do you want me to go through the fight in the Houston night club? The destruction of the charter after the NLCS? And all the rest of the incidents in that book that are well documented? Milledge: [url]http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/422389p-356546c.html[/url]
Consensual or not, and the fact that it appears to be the only legal trouble Milledge has on his record, it is still a statutory rape charge on his record. Church: [url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR2005092002093.html[/url] Seems like his comments were inflamatory enough to warrant an apology (which was needed even if it wasn't inflamatory enough of course) and a strong reaction from the DC Jewish leaders
Yes Rocker spouted off venomous words about people of sexual orientation and ethnicity, but at the same time you could say they are both rather simplistic people who made the mistake of showing their ignorance and black & white view of others. Rocker's mistake also was in that he just didn't know when to shut up. So where exactly are all the other mistakes and distortions that I made?
|
Rockin' Doc Dec 09 2007 05:35 PM |
SJR - "...Rocker's mistake also was in that he just didn't know when to shut up."
|
Edgy DC Dec 09 2007 05:47 PM Edited 4 time(s), most recently on Dec 10 2007 11:39 AM |
Damn, Steve, it's hack work to the core and you know it. Stop defending the indefensible. And there's no "show me where else." One piece of bullshit discredits the whole argument. Vince Coleman threw firecrackers into a crowdWrong, he threw one. injuring a young girlWell that's padding to sensationalize. Girls are young by definition. Pad it with facts and you'll find he injured three children. That's your angle. Most self-serving is that you ignore that the sequence of events makes this not a parallel at all to the Elijah Dukes/Nationals situation. Coleman did what he did and was suspended for the remainder of the season and never played again for the Mets. Dukes did what he did and the Nats took advantage of his depressed stock and went out and acquired him. You're also deliberately not remembering that people were disgusted and abandoned the team in droves. You're also missing a period. Bret Saberhagen squirted bleach at a bunch of sports writers and injured one of themAn injury I don't recall. The Mets investigated, dragged him to contrition, suspended and fined him, even holding the suspension over until the next season when they could have activated him while injured and called it a suspension. That is an entirely appropriate response for a situation that doesn't belong in the same breath. You're again deliberately not remembering that people were disgusted and abandoned the team in droves, and the team was rightly embarrassed. They traded the guy the next season. Again the sequence is reversed from that of the Nationals and Dukes. You're again missing a period. Vince Coleman may or may not have beheading a catColeman, Mitchell, whatever. I heard it was Tom Seaver. There are countless tales of Gooden and Strawberry's history of possible spousal abuse to say nothing of their battles with their demons, which BTW doesn't just hurt the addict but the addict's family and friends as well.And how did the team act inappropriately with these two? The sequence is again relevant in the distinguishing these cases. Again it's ignored. Good job on the period this time, though. A case can be made that Carlos Delgado's stance against God Bless America and the National Anthem is hypocritical and Un-American...A stupid case, maybe. ...considering since 2005 he has been working in the United States,He's been working in the United States most of his career, and is a US Citizen. ...and therefore he is not a person worthy of anyone's affection.That's insupportable and ignorant. Guillermo Mota WAS suspended for steroids and wound up being resigned by the MetsAt least you get sequence correct. This is the Mets acting to acquire or retain a player after a transgression. It's a transgression completely un-like those of Dukes and one for which the player expressed contrition, but I didn't like this at all and reserve the right to rip the Mets for it. You still forgot the period. The Mets have had their fair share of players have whispers of PED usage including such fan favorites like Len Dykstra, Howard Johnson, Todd Hundley, Mike Piazza and Edgardo AlfonzoWhispers? You give us whispers? I can create whispers. Look, I'm whispering. There is a reason the book was called "The Bad Guys Won" and that a clique of that team is referred to as "The Scum Bunch"Both these names were self-applied by the groups themselves in un-creative fits of self-aggrandizement. That's the "reason." Oh, yeah, missing period. ect, ect, ect...The abbreviation is "etc.," with the t before the c. It also needs a period at the end. Granted one can make a case that Dukes' transgressions are worse than the ones listed...Yeah, anyone can. Because it's true and glaringly obvious. ...but she can't just drop a team because of one bad apple...Yes, she can. ...when you can look at any franchise's history and find players and employees worthy of scorn and can make non-fans ask you "How can you root for (insert Player X)?"Three basic points Steve, that flow throughout this, as obvious as the deep blue sea, but you ignore. (1) Some things are far worse than other things to tolerate in your friends, your family, your business associates, and your baseball team. (2) The Nats acquired him after his actions but before any clear public penance. (3) People have been pulling out on teams in protest of their indulgence of the behavior of their players for a long time. People have been pulling out on business in protest of their indulgence of the behavior of their employees for a long time. It's a way of voting your morals in a capitalist society and it's healthy. Course the answer is to that is simple.Is it as simple as this strange sentence? Root for players (or singular player if you must) who to you represents what you think a player should be as a person.She wants to do that. You're missng a few commas here and it's a struggle to read. Not drop your loyalty at the drop of the hat because your team brought in a POS.It's not the drop of a hat. It's a considered choice and there's nothing arbitrary about it. Another way of putting it is, you root for the laundry, even if its dirty.You do, maybe. I don't have to. I think it's really shallow. So quite frankly, no you are not allowed back on the bandwagon!Speak for yourself. Oh I agree its hard to root for a POS...That's nice. ...and it would be better once the POS is no longer on the team you root for...So, my sweet Audrey accelerated the process. That's pro-active, and self-empowering. You want to be a slave to the caprice of some random billionnaire and his logo, that's your choice. Dear Audrey wants to be more discriminating. but can you say you really ere much of a fan of the aforementioned franchise if you are just going to chance your fandom based on who the team acquires?I don't know how you are using "chance" here. But yes she is. She's better, because she's making the team better with her tough tough love, for the glory of DC and for all humankind and for abused women everywhere. Because, like I said, you are going to find it awfully hard, and it just may be impossible to find a team that doesn't have a single skeleton in their closet. That is just plain human nature.It's especially hard if you make up and distort a whole lot of irrelevant crap. Hey, tell me again about David Cone fornicating in the bullpen.
|
A Boy Named Seo Dec 09 2007 05:53 PM |
|
SteveJRogers may or may not eat babies. SteveJRogers may or may not hate Mexicans. SteveJRogers may or may not be Derek Jeter's secret boyfriend. This is fun! And easy!
|
Kid Carsey Dec 09 2007 06:05 PM |
Ya know it's bad when Seo piles on, SJR, and Rockin' Doc chimes in.
|
SteveJRogers Dec 09 2007 06:12 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 09 2007 06:24 PM |
|
No its bad when Professor Edgy takes out his red pen...
|
Kid Carsey Dec 09 2007 06:24 PM |
No, it's bad when posters use other posters real names in posts.
|
SteveJRogers Dec 09 2007 06:25 PM |
Thought it was appropriate since Edgy has slipped it in from time to time.
|
Kid Carsey Dec 09 2007 06:32 PM |
JCL: >>>Be quiet Rogers<<<
|
metsguyinmichigan Dec 09 2007 08:17 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 10 2007 06:15 AM |
|
Now you hold on right there. Baby eating and Mexican hating are ugly, ugly, ugly. But Jeter love? That's....despicable! Are there no slander laws in this country? Kneecap his puppy while you're at it! :)
|
metirish Dec 09 2007 09:44 PM |
I need to take time tomorrow and read this properly, hijinx ensue when SJR is on the loose.
|
Edgy DC Dec 10 2007 08:04 AM |
||
Steve, you're out of your depth here. This isn't journalism. I don't know where you're studying, but it's not.
|
metsmarathon Dec 10 2007 09:24 AM |
||
ryan church:
you see hate there? i see concern for the soul of someone who he was just told wouldn't get to heaven because of her beliefs. this concern would have been expressed had the person in question been muslim, buddhist, confucian, atheist, etc. and is rooted in teh belief that knowing and accepting jesus, etc. is the only way into heaven. now, the jewish part of the equation is currently considered incorrect, but had he asked if taoists were doomed and ineligible for heaven, would there have been the outrage? should there have been? would a taoist even care? a taoist should say, so? i don't believe in your heaven anyways. and a jew could make the argument that my christian ass isn't going to heaven either, because i've gone and split up a monotheistic god into three pieces! does that mean jews hate me? i hope not. but lets look back into the words of the immortal and prehaps heaven-ineligible john rocker.
y'know what, steve... you're right. its like they're the same person, isn't it? oy.
|
Nymr83 Dec 10 2007 11:32 AM |
i'm jewish and not at all offended by what church and his minister guy said. they are entitled to believe that i'm going to hell, just as i'm entitled to believe that they are idiots.
|