Master Index of Archived Threads
Johan Viola
Frayed Knot Jan 28 2008 07:46 PM |
The story of dealing 5 prospects for a 29 y/o Twins lefthander were too juicy to let the comparisons go ignored.
|
Nymr83 Jan 28 2008 11:15 PM |
interesting.
|
smg58 Jan 29 2008 09:25 AM |
The Twins ultimately got more out of that deal than the Mets did, even with just one of the five guys really panning out.
|
Valadius Jan 29 2008 09:39 AM |
This is why I don't want to trade for Santana.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 29 2008 09:45 AM |
The Frank Viola trade is more of an exception than a rule, I think.
|
Frayed Knot Jan 29 2008 11:47 AM |
Not that there's any specific reason to think that the one career arc having anything to do with the other - but the biggest cautionary note in this comparison is the part about Frankie V being essentially washed up after age 33.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 29 2008 11:49 AM |
Yes, the bigger risk, I think, in the proposed deal is the financial part, not the talent part.
|
Edgy DC Jan 29 2008 11:54 AM |
The real cautionary notes wtih long term deals to pitchers have names like Pavano, Hampton, and Mark Davis.
|
Nymr83 Jan 29 2008 02:08 PM |
Kevin Brown
|
Frayed Knot Jan 29 2008 02:18 PM |
... and others
|
Elster88 Jan 29 2008 02:58 PM |
|
That's a ridiculous thing to say. You can't look at one trade and have it dictate what you will do for the rest of time.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 29 2008 03:02 PM |
I thought he didn't want Santana because of Bush-Clinton-Bush.
|
Nymr83 Jan 29 2008 03:40 PM |
||
unles that trade is the Seaver trade. never do that again.
|
SteveJRogers Jan 29 2008 03:51 PM |
||
Not to mention all the hindsight about who exactly the Mets gave up. Would you have rather have had Aggie over John Franco? Okay maybe Augliera turned out to be more dominant for a shorter period of time, but it's not like the Mets have been starving for even a decent closer since Augliera left. Heck, except for after the Benitez trade the Mets have always had someone you could call a decent MLB closer since trading away Rick Augliera. Myers (who was defacto closer since the McDowell trade), Franco, Benitez, Looper, Wagner. Having a guy with some talent in the back of the pen has not been the Mets problem since 1989. Oh sure there WERE issues with all of the aforementioned, including Wagner, but if the Mets decided Rick Augliera was their future closer, people would be saying the same things about Aggie that they say today about Wagner. Very soild closer, but not that upper top tier of closer-dom. Kevin Tapani? You are afraid of the next KEVIN TAPANI? How many Kevin Tapani types have the Mets trotted out to the hill since 1989? Tapani was small potatoes, a dime-a-dozen guy that could be had for an economical price. And again, having a soild number 2 or 3 starter has never really been the Mets problem since 1989. Part of the problem is that they've tried to make number 2s and 3s into number 1 aces, but that is a different argument. You want to bring up Ryan for Fregosi or Kazmir for Zambrano, then its a soild argument, but Viola for Augliera does not rank among the worst trades in Met history. Even with Viola being finished at 33.
|
Nymr83 Jan 29 2008 03:55 PM |
|
actually, guys like that get huge contracts now. see gil meche.
|
SteveJRogers Jan 29 2008 04:13 PM |
||
Right, good point!
|
Willets Point Jan 29 2008 06:32 PM |
Gil Meche had a good season for the lowly Royals. Would have been a good signing for the Mets last offseason.
|
Nymr83 Jan 29 2008 07:53 PM |
|
20/20 hindsight, but he had his first good year since 2000 (when he pitched only 85 innings.) since then he had had ERA+ numbers of 94, 91, 82, and 99 after missing 2 years. if omar had given him 5 years/$55M we'd have been up in arms and rightfully so. lets see how the next few years pan out before we call that a good move
|
smg58 Jan 30 2008 05:14 AM |
I do think the Viola comparison shows that quantity where prospects are concerned isn't a bad thing. The Twins get three players on most people's top 100 lists, plus a fourth (Humber) who was on the lists last year and is capable of rebounding. The Yankees and Red Sox packages involved one elite prospect apiece, but both teams were reluctant to add significantly more (i.e., the Red Sox apparently never included Ellsbury and Lester in the same package, and the Yankees never added Kennedy to Hughes), and apparently lowered their offers over time. So while the Twins might have done better if they had taken best offers in December when they were playing the Yankees and Red Sox against each other, I don't think it's fair to suggest, as some people have, that a better offer was available now.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 30 2008 12:46 PM |
I find it kind of amusing that yesterday, for the first time ever, Frank Viola was the most popular UMDB lookup for the day.
|
seawolf17 Jan 31 2008 10:54 AM |
I've been playing Out of the Park Baseball for a while now, and I picked up Santana a few seasons back. Hopefully Real Santana's career doesn't fall apart the way Computer Game Santana's career did. After finishing in the Top 5 in the AL in IP and K's just about every year through 2008:
|
AG/DC Jan 31 2008 10:58 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jan 31 2008 10:58 AM |
Woo-hoo! 2013 Chamipons, baybee!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 31 2008 10:58 AM |
I'll take that 2013 Worlds Championship, though.
|
seawolf17 Feb 01 2008 07:02 AM |
[url=http://www.metsblog.com/2008/01/31/read-viola-questions-twins-trade-value/]Frank Viola:[/url]
|