Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Baseball's Other Drug Problem

metirish
Feb 08 2008 08:30 PM

Crazy story in Newsweek.

]


Baseball's Other Drug Problem
Are players using an ADD diagnosis to evade the amphetamine ban?

By Charles Euchner | Newsweek Web Exclusive


As Major League Baseball begins to dig out from its steroids scandal, new kinds of performance-enhancing substances are sweeping big-league clubhouses: Ritalin, Adderall and other drugs designed to help with Attention-Deficit Disorder. According to records MLB officials turned over to congressional investigators as part of George Mitchell's probe into steroid use in baseball, the number of players getting "therapeutic use exemptions" from baseball's amphetamines ban jumped in one year from 28 to 103—which means that, suddenly, 7.6 percent of the 1,354 players on major-league rosters had been diagnosed with ADD.

One possible reason for this increase: in 2005 baseball banned the use of "greenies," amphetamines that help players remained focused and energetic through the rigors of a 162-game season. Amphetamines were once as common as deli spreads in big-league clubhouses—in some, greenies were used to spike the coffee. Players are now seeking doctors' prescriptions for ADD medications, usually Ritalin and Adderall, apparently to replace the now-illegal energy boosting drugs. (Ritalin is the trade name for the drug methylphenidate, and Adderall is an amphetamine-dextroamphetamine; they are both considered stimulants.)

Certainly, some of the players getting prescriptions for ADD medications may have a legitimate medical need, says David Goodman, a Johns Hopkins University doctor who has been invited to help Major League baseball develop a new strategy for amphetamines. But he calls the ADD drug spike "troubling," since it inevitably raises suspicion that players have simply found a way to evade the amphetamine ban. No cases of abuse have been reported. Determining which cases might be bogus would require a thorough study of both the prescribing doctors and the thoroughness of their examination process. Baseball commissioner Bud Selig says the league is investigating the ADD diagnoses to determine which ones are legitimate medical problems and which ones might be attempts to evade the amphetamines ban.

Separating the legitimate users from the abusers won't be easy. Estimates of ADD vary widely, from as little as 4 percent among adults to as much as 16 percent among adolescents and young adults. A diagnostician needs to assess a variety of behaviors—some of which may seem like ADD but in fact be other conditions. (The medical establishment often uses the term ADHD—attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder—interchangeably with ADD). A diagnosis of ADD requires not only evaluating an adult's behavior and mental state but also looking into the individual's childhood and family background. ADD is a genetic condition that makes its first appearance early in life. The symptoms of other conditions—bipolar disease, anxiety disorder, depression, developmental or learning differences—can make ADD diagnoses tricky and subjective.

Complicating the issue is that sports can both strengthen and undermine a person's mental well-being. The intense physical activity fosters a level of focus and commitment that helps the athlete improve the functioning of the brain. In fact, athletic competition can be the best cure for ADD, says Dr. John J. Ratey, an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and the author of "Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain." Ratey has treated athletes who suddenly displayed the symptoms of ADD after injuries sidelined them. He prescribed medications during the down time, then weaned the athlete once he got back into action.

On the other hand, the lifestyle of professional athletes—constant travel, bad food, abuse of alcohol and drugs, irregular sleep patterns—can scramble the brain, undoing all the good effects of the exercise. Improper drug use often masks real needs. "People with ADD often look for a way to self-medicate and they're more susceptible to using [illegal drugs] that promise to sustain their effort," says Dr. Sanford J. Silverman of the Center for Attention Deficit and Learning Disorders in Scottsdale, Ariz. New therapies go far beyond exercise. Silverman uses neurofeedback to improve brain functioning. Patients wear a helmet that tracks brain activity. Visualizing and physical exercises help to stimulate the underactive parts and tamp down the overactive parts. ADD requires customized treatments, Goodman notes. "The effect of exercise is variable from athlete to athlete," he says. "Some do better with medications and some do better with exercise."

With the steroids scandal still rippling through baseball, MLB is under particular pressure not to allow a new drug controversy to develop. Management faces a twin challenge: preventing the use of drugs that give some players unfair advantages by souping up their bodies like race cars while not denying medication and other assistance to an athlete suffering from a legitimate malady. Ultimately, experts say, the best way to identify both legitimate medical conditions and illicit drug use is to devise top-to-bottom systems that track a player's progress on a number of dimensions. To know a player is to know when he might be heading off course.

Euchner, a lecturer in English at Yale University, is completing a book about suicide at the Golden Gate Bridge.







http://www.newsweek.com/id/108730

AG/DC
Feb 08 2008 08:39 PM

Yeah, this is a secret that everybody knows.

I don't think it's another problem. But part of the bigger one.

Nymr83
Feb 08 2008 09:23 PM

perhaps MLB needs a rule that any prescriptions that will require you to get an exemption from a banned substance rule require the consent of a doctor not affiliated with an MLB team?

Frayed Knot
Feb 09 2008 07:04 AM

"perhaps MLB needs a rule that any prescriptions that will require you to get an exemption from a banned substance rule require the consent of a doctor not affiliated with an MLB team?"

Unaffiliated docs would probably make it worse. (Heath? ... Elvis?)
Hell, I could probably find one to declare that I'm in need of menopause meds.

Go all the way back to 'Ball Four' where the players were getting their stash from outside docs while keeping the who and how info from the in-house MDs and training staff because they knew that those guys would squeal to mgmt.

vtmet
Feb 09 2008 09:36 AM

Not saying that baseball shouldn't be under the gun for performance enhancers, but why so much focus on baseball while I'm not seeing any focus on football or even basketball? Does the NFL have a really strict testing/enforcement policy that I'm not aware of? I have a hard time believing that so many 300+ pound athletes are naturally that big while still being agile...how many snickers bars does it take to make an athlete that size, yet not move like Jaba the Hut?

holychicken
Feb 09 2008 10:45 AM

All I can say is that I know from personal experience that Adderall is a performance enhancing drug. Back in college, that stuff gave me incredible accuracy and stamina when playing beer pong till 4 in the morning. If it can keep me throwing ping pong balls into cups while totally trashed, god knows what it can do for sober baseball player.

Nymr83
Feb 09 2008 12:02 PM

] Does the NFL have a really strict testing/enforcement policy that I'm not aware of?


stricter than baseball's at least, and its been in existence for alot longer.

Frayed Knot
Feb 09 2008 02:07 PM

="Nymr83"]
] ... stricter than baseball's at least, and its been in existence for alot longer.


The NFL had it earlier, yes (although Lawrence Taylor used to openly talk about how easy it was to beat) but it's no stricter now in terms of test frequency or penalties than MLB.

The main difference in terms of attention paid is simply that the fans & media just don't care.
Most of the players in the NFL are nothing more than faceless cogs to fans so, unless a Manning or Brady were to get caught with a van-full of vials, the news usually gets broken in the agate type in the back of the paper and the fans generally give a collective yawn.
The NFL also controls the media to such a degree that they just seem to take whatever the league gives them and rarely attempt to strike out beyond those boundries. The NYPost's Joel Sherman has been the one guy I've read who has actually called out the football-covering press for doing a lousy job.

soupcan
Feb 09 2008 02:17 PM

Frayed Knot wrote:
Unaffiliated docs would probably make it worse. (Heath? ... Elvis?)
Hell, I could probably find one to declare that I'm in need of menopause meds.

Go all the way back to 'Ball Four' where the players were getting their stash from outside docs while keeping the who and how info from the in-house MDs and training staff because they knew that those guys would squeal to mgmt.


'Tis true. I have a brother-in-law who is an anasthesiologist. I asked him for some Ambien. He lectured me on the addictive qualities of it and every sleep med out there and absolutely would not give me a prescription for it. Instead he suggested that I try an herbal tea that he recommended.

A week later I'm talking to a dermatologist friend and I mentioned the tea and how I came to know about it. The dermatologist then says to me "well if you still want it, I'll write you a prescription for the Ambien..."

Nymr83
Feb 09 2008 02:59 PM

]The NFL also controls the media to such a degree ...


that much is certainly true, remember that fictional show on ESPN about the misfit football team? i forget what it was called but it was a good show and got good ratings but the NFL made ESPN cancel it.

Frayed Knot
Feb 10 2008 08:35 AM

^ Hey check it out ... not only are Soupy & Nymr dueling John Stearns' but they
^ have identical post totals !! (or at least they did when I wrote this)
^
^
^
^
^

AG/DC
Feb 10 2008 10:02 AM

Joined on the same day also.