Master Index of Archived Threads
So what was the worst collapse in baseball history
SteveJRogers Feb 18 2008 08:31 PM |
|
Taking your highly debatable premise that blowing a 3-0 series lead trumps everything else aside since the fact that they were both postseason teams strengthens the argument that a regular season collapse is worse. Plus the fact that you could say that it was bound to happen eventually not to mention it can be tied, not surpassed and no one has ever lumped teams blowing 3-1 or 2-0 leads among the biggest chokes of all time. Okay, Lets talk collapses that are bigger than the 2007 Mets? Sheer numbers would give 10+ leads such as the '51 Dodgers, '78 Red Sox and such an edge, but they had evolved into a neck-and-neck run by the end of the season that you can call it more of a run by the chaser as opposed to a collapse by the division/league leader. 1964? The 2007 Mets topped that by being up by such a large margin with two weeks to go that the phrase "No team has ever lost the league/division lead after being up by 7 with two weeks to go" was being tossed around. There was a reason the "Your Postseason Has Come" ads were being run. Not to mention the cherry on top being the Phillies spending only 2 days in first all year, the last two of the season! Ergo, the 2007 Mets executed the worse collapse in the history of Major League Baseball.
|
AG/DC Feb 18 2008 09:36 PM Re: So what was the worst collapse in baseball history |
|
I not only didn't say this, I can't understand it.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 18 2008 11:14 PM |
Not a chance. Losing a 3-0 lead to your arch-rival then sending said rival to its first World Championship since Woodrow Wilson was in the White House absolutely trumps pissing away a mere division title.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 19 2008 05:56 AM |
I don't see the need for this debate.
|
SteveJRogers Feb 19 2008 05:59 AM |
So if the 98 Braves or 99 Mets had pulled off the reverse sweep, you still would hold the 2004 Yankees as worse?
|
Willets Point Feb 19 2008 06:11 AM |
I don't really see it as a collapse. The fact is they were an 88-win team and being an 89-win team might of won the division but wouldn't have made them that much a different team (and probably one that would have fallen in 3 games in the NLDS like the Phillies did). The Mets pretty much were lucky to be at top of a weak division for most of the season, and player slumps and holes in the roster caught up with them. The team had a hot April, a cold September, and mediocre months in-between. Swap their April performance with their September performance and all the psychobabble about how "they gave up," "didn't have heart," "lazy loafers," and "playing with their heads up their asses" would be replaced with "valiantly fighting," "playing with heart," and "just missing a great comeback." And all of it is bullshit. Like I said before they were an 88-win, 2nd-place team and deserved to be an 88-win, 2nd-place team. 2007 wasn't their year. 2008 will be. It's time to move on.
|
HahnSolo Feb 19 2008 06:35 AM |
I shouldn't get involved, but:
|
Valadius Feb 19 2008 06:44 AM |
Dammit Steve, there's no need to dredge this shit up again. We've put it behind us. I'd rather we not discuss it. Let's focus on the upcoming season and not on ranking how painful last September was.
|
metirish Feb 19 2008 06:52 AM |
Well it is a discussion board Val, it's the worst collapse I've ever seen, which isn't saying much. Hopefully that won't happen again.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 19 2008 07:11 AM |
And it certainly WAS a collapse. For that last miserable two or three weeks, they were playing like they were afraid to lose. It was awful, and it was ugly.
|
AG/DC Feb 19 2008 07:13 AM |
Is saying it was the worst of all tme meaningful?
|
holychicken Feb 19 2008 07:19 AM |
I think there is a debate as to whether or not it was the worst pennant race collapse, but, IMO, it is undeniably the worst regular season collapse of all time.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 19 2008 07:26 AM |
|
Not really. It's subjective, anyway.
|
Rockin' Doc Feb 19 2008 11:12 AM |
Worst ever, second worst ever, or bad but not even in the running for worst ever collapse. Who cares? I swear, sometimes I think Steve just likes to see himself type.
|
RealityChuck Feb 19 2008 11:22 AM |
Hey, if the '62 Mets can lay claim to worst team ever, the '07 Mets can lay claim to worst collapse.
|
Fman99 Feb 19 2008 11:54 AM |
|
"F'in A, Cotton! F'in A!"
|