Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


There's a game on, IGT 8/19 Gnats @ Mets

KC
Aug 19 2005 07:40 PM

Geez, Cy Seo just broke one in nasty to Castillo. Maybe he should get
out of the way next time.

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 19 2005 07:49 PM

Mets blew a first inning chance when with two on Floyd popped up and Wright whiffed (not to mention escaping death with a derring 2-out double steal).

We do a lot of nutty shit like that.

KC
Aug 19 2005 07:51 PM

Through two, sniffle-sniffle.

It's Seo vs. Patterson, each team has a hit.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 07:56 PM

Dont get the game 2night where I am. Ill be watchin thru CBSsportline and you guys.

I like the discriptive terms used here.

CBS was boring enuff before, but compared to the details I get here its like watching paint dry now. :lol:

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:20 PM

Really inept slide by Wright as he gets thrown out stealing.

KC
Aug 19 2005 08:26 PM

Later better replays show he was actually safe, and crafty. There's special
stuff with this guy. He's got the game head.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 08:30 PM

The Bucs are beating up on the Phils, 6-1, in the fourth.

Let's gain some ground tonight.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:35 PM

5th - Reyes singles with 2 out.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:36 PM

And is brutally picked off. Mets not at baserunning peak form tonight.

Yancy Street Gang
Aug 19 2005 08:41 PM

I demand an explanation for Jae Seo pitching in Norfolk all year while the Mets were sending Ishii to the mound every five days.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:41 PM

Well, I'm being unkind. Reyes does have three steals.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:44 PM

Seo continues to meo 'em down. Another easy inning.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 08:46 PM

Valadius wrote:
The Bucs are beating up on the Phils, 6-1, in the fourth.

Let's gain some ground tonight.


I do get that game here on TV, and I am watching it. Rainin off & on there(not hard).

Still 6-1 in the 5th.

Atl has a 1 run lead and no score yet in Asstro game.

According to CBS, Seo is up to 78 pitches tossed in 6.
Only 2 hits allowed (both to Mookie Preston)/ 1 bb/ 3 Ks.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 08:49 PM

Yancy Street Gang wrote:
I demand an explanation for Jae Seo pitching in Norfolk all year while the Mets were sending Ishii to the mound every five days.


good point.
I thought early on Ishii should be in the pen and Hielman in the rotation.

I really think it all came down to Ishii being a lefty. But they went a wee bit too long with him as a starter.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:51 PM

One out single by Beltran.

The out was interesting..Cairo a grounder into the hole, Vidro knocks it up into the air, catches it on the fly, fires to first just in time.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:52 PM

Almost a DP on a shoetop catch by Guillen in right. Beltran just back to first.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 08:53 PM

Is it just me, or does Brad Wilkerson have one of the biggest heads I've ever seen?

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 08:55 PM

Wright pops up and the scoreless tie continues.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:00 PM

="Valadius"]Is it just me, or does Brad Wilkerson have one of the biggest heads I've ever seen?



steroidtest him asap.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:04 PM

Classy 4--6-3 and rack up another inning for Seo.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:07 PM

Bucs blow it open.

Lead the Phils 10-1.

they have 12 hits to the Phils 2.

7th inn.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:08 PM

Ramon careens into second with a one-out double.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:11 PM

And Castro chugs home on a single by Diaz. Seo to stay in the game with a one run lead.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:13 PM

At least we scored a run.

But Victor needs some work.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:14 PM

Diaz about to give it back? Shoulda caught it, but it's a leradoff couble for Castillo.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:15 PM

]I demand an explanation for Jae Seo pitching in Norfolk all year while the Mets were sending Ishii to the mound every five days.


Well, there's an explanation. You're just not going to like it.

Three basefunning outs today. In fairness, one was, according to KC, a bad call. And, not getting the game mice-elf, I suspect Victor was giving himself up.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:15 PM

That would be Castilla, Vinny Castilla.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:16 PM

TheOldMole wrote:
And Castro chugs home on a single by Diaz. Seo to stay in the game with a one run lead.


YESSSsss!

uh-oh-i see a Nat on 3rd here.
Seo is up to 94 pitches.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:17 PM

Look who's pinch-hitting everybody!

It's Carlos Baerga!

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:18 PM

whoa!
San Diego does some work and is up on ATL now 9-3 in the 5th.

KC
Aug 19 2005 09:19 PM

It's nice to be up by one, but Diaz could be brought to task in my book for
bad baserunning between first and second. (again)

cooby
Aug 19 2005 09:19 PM

Valadius wrote:
Look who's pinch-hitting everybody!

It's Carlos Baerga!



whoa, I'm outta here...

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:20 PM

And now we have Mr. Steroid-Head at the plate.

KC
Aug 19 2005 09:20 PM

I meant, one-sniffle.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:21 PM

Valadius wrote:
Look who's pinch-hitting everybody!

It's Carlos Baerga!


Seo walked him just so the bench could chuckle at the funny way he walks to 1st.
need that gb dp.

Cant give that run right back.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:22 PM

A key strikeout for Seo. Big-head gets rung up.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:22 PM

Huge-assed strikeout of Wilkerson.

Now, don't let up. Get me a Vidro also.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:24 PM

And the kid hangs in/ Can of corn to Beltran, out of the inning.

KC
Aug 19 2005 09:26 PM

This is Seo sick ... let's bring the bats!

Yancy Street Gang
Aug 19 2005 09:26 PM

I bet Looper gets the ninth inning.

Two or more insurance runs in the bottom of the 8th would be very attractive.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:27 PM

TheOldMole wrote:
And the kid hangs in/ Can of corn to Beltran, out of the inning.


whew.

consolation information:
Hampton only went 3.1 for Atl.
Gave up 7 runs on 11 hits.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:29 PM

Seo walked him just so the bench could chuckle at the funny way he walks to 1st.

It seems Zvon the Ryan Thompson Gunner hasn't met our friend Cooby yet.

Let's let Seo go for 1-0 shutout. It's Big Train time.

cooby
Aug 19 2005 09:30 PM

How about it?

BTW, Seo is now a Woolie, I hope he's happy

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:31 PM

Yancy Street Gang wrote:
I bet Looper gets the ninth inning.


dont know if i can stand to sit thru that.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:31 PM

What the Hell, G? Gameday is saying a coaching visit to the mound after pitch one of an intentional walk.

Talking intentional walk strategy?

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:36 PM

Edgy DC wrote:
Seo walked him just so the bench could chuckle at the funny way he walks to 1st.

It seems Zvon the Ryan Thompson Gunner hasn't met our friend Cooby yet.


I was gonna say the gay way he runs to 1st but I dont want to offend anyone my second day here.
lol.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:43 PM

Looper to protect 1-0.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:44 PM

If Looper blows this Ill,.....Ill....

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 19 2005 09:44 PM

Help me Jeebus.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:47 PM

A DOUBLE PLAY! Neat by Cairo, neat by Reyes.

Preston Wilson the last chance.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:47 PM

single....
then a HUGE dp.

okay...
i think I can breath again.

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:48 PM

Some out-of-town notes:

Cincy is HAMMERING the D-Backs, 17-3, in the bottom of the 6th.

Bucs leading now 11-1 over Philly.

ScarletKnight41
Aug 19 2005 09:48 PM

And a strikeout to end the game!

The Mets Win! The Mets Win!

Elster88
Aug 19 2005 09:48 PM

Mookie's son strikes out looking to end it.

We win!!!!

So, Seo is nasty.

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 19 2005 09:48 PM



Holy hell. That was a thriller -- and Seo pitched every bit as well as Pedro has in any game this year.

TheOldMole
Aug 19 2005 09:48 PM

Put it in the books...a happy recap. Looper strikes out Wilson. But it's Jae Seo's night.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:49 PM

Yeah, day three's always the best time for that.

Floyd is struck out by Frankenloogy Joey Eischen.



Bring on Indigo Montoya, who gets Wright on the flyout.

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 09:49 PM

Wow!

We don't need no steenkin' insurance runs.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:49 PM

YEHAA

damn good game.
Seo keeps up his fine display of pitchin.

Elster88
Aug 19 2005 09:49 PM

Seo takes off his cap and bows to his contingent of thunder-stickers in the stands. I respect those fans, too. I prefer them to the boobirds everyday.

MiniKnight
Aug 19 2005 09:52 PM

Some very good pitching by Jae Seo takes us into the 9th inning, where Looper ends up getting the save.

That one run in the 7th inning was good enough!

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 09:56 PM

I want Jae Seo on this team for a LONG time.

Elster88
Aug 19 2005 09:58 PM

="Edgy DC"]
Bring on Indigo Montoya, who gets Wright on the flyout.


I think it was Inigo.

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 09:59 PM

Edgy DC wrote:
Yeah, day three's always the best time for that.

Floyd is struck out by Frankenloogy Joey Eischen.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 19 2005 10:03 PM

Bam.

metirish
Aug 19 2005 10:06 PM

Seo turns Irish night into Korean night,the "Seo Heads" were out in force tonight, great bloody game.

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 19 2005 10:08 PM

I'll tell ya what -- Seo looked like a dadgum pennant race shutdown guy tonight. He was loaded with emotion and the 7th and 8th innings ended with him triumphantly shaking his fist and shouting. It was exhilerating.

KC
Aug 19 2005 10:11 PM

Big yup ©

Edgy DC
Aug 19 2005 10:16 PM

Hang onto your butts.

Seo since his recall:

GWLERASVIPHERBBSO
3300.39023.1131415

Zvon
Aug 19 2005 10:21 PM

Edgy DC wrote:
Hang onto your butts.

Seo since his recall:

GWLERASVIPHERBBSO
3300.39023.1131415


wow

0.39!

Valadius
Aug 19 2005 10:27 PM

He's pitching like an absolute ace. Wow.

metirish
Aug 19 2005 10:30 PM

WOW is right,those numbers are crazy, huge kudos to Billy Connors for working his magic.

Nymr83
Aug 20 2005 12:00 AM

]I demand an explanation for Jae Seo pitching in Norfolk all year while the Mets were sending Ishii to the mound every five days.


i've been saying that all year!

Rockin' Doc
Aug 20 2005 09:14 AM

"I demand an explanation for Jae Seo pitching in Norfolk all year while the Mets were sending Ishii to the mound every five days."

I'm not saying it's right, but I believe Ishii got the nod based on seniority and his contract size. When Trachsel went to the DL due to his back, I think the Mets lacked faith in Seo, which prompted the trade for Ishii at the start of the season.

Edgy DC
Aug 20 2005 09:33 AM

I think most here preferred going with Seo or Heilman.

Rockin' Doc
Aug 20 2005 09:57 AM

Edgy -"I think most here preferred going with Seo or Heilman"

I would agree that was the general feeling of the CPF. Unfortunately, this is one time in which I believe our intended course would have worked out better than the actions taken by Omar and the Mets brass. Not that losing Phillips has hurt the team much in light of Castro's able play, but for the most part, Ishii has been a disaster.

Frayed Knot
Aug 20 2005 09:59 AM

]I believe Ishii got the nod based on seniority and his contract size. When Trachsel went to the DL due to his back, I think the Mets lacked faith in Seo, which prompted the trade for Ishii at the start of the season.


Remember also that Benson was down as the season started.
And, yes, the fact that they traded for Ishii in the first place showed the lack of faith in Seo and/or Heliman although, coming off last year, it's not like either one had earned themselves a whole lot of slack.

The argument that the team then stayed too long with Ishii while Heilman was cleaning up in the pen and JWS toiling in the minors is probably true - although it does tend to scan over the parts where Ishii did provide (early) a few more good starts than he seems to get credit for; that the supposed weak pen would have been a whole lot weaker w/o Heilman there to bolster it; and that Seo has emerged from his exile with a wider variety of pitches then just the two he was (by some accounts) stubbornly clinging to for the last few seasons.

Johnny Dickshot
Aug 20 2005 10:27 AM

I think the ideal scenario from the Mets POV was to have Ishii in there as a get-by guy just long enough till Trax returned, a minor leaguer made too compelling a case, and/or emergency depth in the event that Benson's injury was more severe than planned, someone else got hurt, or Zambrano didn't turn around his bad start. He got as many starts as he did because they hoped he coulda garnered enough value to trade when those situations righted (or wronged) themselves.

Not for nothing but he went 7, gave up 1 ER and whiffed 9 at Norfolk in hois first start there.

Lets trade 1 excess pitcher for Ray Durham already.

Rotblatt
Aug 20 2005 11:02 AM

Seo reeled off I believe 12 quality starts in a row for Norfolk with some sick numbers. He sucked at first and then had his "my wife is pregnant" start, which kind of masked how good he was to someone just glancing at his stats, but anyone who's suprised by Seo coming up and pitching well wasn't paying attention.

Not that anyone would have predicted he'd be as amazing as he has been, but seriously, it didn't take a genius to suggest that Seo should be given a shot.

And because it's nice to be right every now and then, here's what I wrote on July 6:

]Seo's AAA line overall [includes 3 or 4 incredibly crappy starts at beginning of the year before being called up and subsequently demoted]
2.84 ERA, 1.16 WHIP, 8.70 K/9, 3.65 K/BB, .55 HR/9

The Korean 28-year old has now thrown 12 straight quality starts for Norfolk since being demoted. Did I mention that he should be starting over Ishii?


Anyway, I hope this makes Willie more willing to use what he's got in AAA. Valent and Bell should probably be called up ASAP.

Edgy DC
Aug 20 2005 01:49 PM

Sure, you're right. And considering how tough the Mets situation has been at first base, I can't say we mightn't have found use for Jason Phillips also.

But:

(1) It's not like most here weren't saying the same thing.

(2) The "demand an explanation" stuff is just silly. The explanation is obvious, even if it's been shown to have been misguided.

(3) Let's try real hard to be the forum largely populated by people who disagree with each other and the organizaition without lightly accusing the forum or the organization of (a) being peopled by idiots who are making a choice no other organization would've, or (b) acting in bad faith.

Humility --- it's the new thing.

Zvon
Aug 20 2005 03:16 PM

heres some pics from this game.


Bret Sabermetric
Aug 20 2005 03:21 PM

And if it happens to be your belief, supported by abundant evidence, that either a) or b) (or both) are true, then by all means let's be the forum that makes you feel unwelcome here. By all means, let's be the one forum that will not tolerate harsh criticism of a club that plays piss-poor baseball for four years running, and that rewards good pitching with extended stints in the bullpen or in AAA while protecting its errors in judgment with start after start after start. And please--let us not consider it appropriate behavior to dare chastise policies that reinforce such rampant do-doism, not suggest that such policies must change before we should back off our criticism.

Let's play nice here. Let's be Met-friendly, whatever the performance on the field, for however long it endures.

Let's be different from all those nasty creeps who propose we do something awful like, you know, win once in a while. Please--some humility, tempered by docile and mindless acceptance of the status quo. "No systematic criticism, please--we're Mets fans."

KC
Aug 20 2005 03:38 PM

Welcome back, Bret. I trust the shock treatments went well? Jeez, what
did they feed you in there ... you look like you've lost some weight?

Bret Sabermetric
Aug 20 2005 06:32 PM

Truly? No, my sister-in-law fed me very well the last few weeks. I've put on a pound or two, I'm sure. Caught one Rockies game, which bored me stiff, mostly fished and hiked in the mountains, thanks for asking.

I really hadn't planned on posting so quickly here, but this is really the rankest hypocrisy, Edgy innocently asking before I left Who on earth could ever think any CPFer would attempt to discredit my views--Heavens to Betsy, everyone's perspective is welcome around here, Kumbaya and all that-- and then to be welcomed by his accurately stating my position with the addendum that of course WE don't want to allow such an outre position stated here on the CPF. WE're so much better than that.

I really don't mind someone disagreeing with me, but to do so with an air of superiority kinda gets my hackles up, and to further insist that you're terribly open-minded about privileging all opinions just pisses me off.

Rotblatt
Aug 21 2005 12:47 AM

Not to get in the middle of anything, but I'm pretty sure that wasn't directed at you, Sal, but at whomever made the initial "I demand an explanation" post. And I totally agree with the main point in that demand, by the way--not so much in the literal sense of "what explanation did we have for keeping him down" but in the "why did we let PR trump good baseball" sense.

I DO kind of think that not many organizations would've made the same choices we had. Not necessarily in trading for Ishii--not a bad trade, in my book--but in leaving Seo--a guy who pitched quite well in the bigs not that long ago--down in Norfolk for so long despite embarassing the fuck out of his AAA opponents, which is exactly what he was doing for all but around 4 of his 20 or so AAA starts.

And it's not just the numbers--I've seen a couple of his starts since he came back up and the guy is just filthy right now. He's got nice, late movement on his new splitter and cutter, and he's locating his change and fastball really well. He is, in a word, dominant, and he has been since he pitched for us when Ishii went down and we should have seen that sooner.

Either our scouts weren't telling management how good Seo really was, which means they're ineffective, or they were and management wasn't listening, which means management didn't care enough about winning. Either way, it's embarassing that we left him down there for so long, if you ask me, ESPECIALLY when we're in the middle of a wild card race where every run counts.

The decision to leave him down was mitigated somewhat by finally bringing him up and continuing to give him starts, but our organization really WOULD have to be completely retarded to have sent him down--or even denied him a single start--after how well he's pitched for us.

I really don't think there's any way to put a positive BASEBALL--e.g., help our team win--spin on the decision to leave Seo down while Ishii pitched in the bigs. Or Zambrano, who has been inconsistent as well, and was, IMO, pitching over his head for much of the season.

IMO, it's a black eye for the organization which will only be washed away by making it to the post-season this year or by completely collapsing in the next month.

Anything less calls into serious question the decision to leave Ishii here and Seo in the minors. I mean, Seo's three starts in April and May for us where he went 2-1 with a 2.00 ERA, a 0.72 WHIP, a 7.00 K/9 with a 4.67 K/BB ratio were far better than ANY THREE STARTS OF ISHII'S 16 THIS SEASON AT ALL--never MIND that Seo's were back-to-back-to-back.

Seo went 7 innings on May 4, giving up just one hit and two walks, striking out eight before being sent down to the minors. That start is the best single start in 2005 by any Met starter not named Pedro Martinez or Aaron Heilman. And yet we left him in AAA for two months, during which time he was consistently and ridiculously good.

It's an embarassment and reflects poorly on our organization. I just don't see any other way of viewing it.

Bret Sabermetric
Aug 21 2005 05:34 AM

I'm quite sure Edgy's smarter than to direct his comment at me deliberately, Rot. I was just taken by the juxtaposition of his holier-than-thou taunt (I'll find it for you, if you like) to the effect of innocently asking "Who on the CPF is denying Sal the right to express his opinion?"' and his post in this thread more or less expressly stating CPF policy to be just that--i.e., let's be the only Met forum not to allow posting of a negative kind.

The real question is why do the Mets have such foolish policies? If they would have done various moves that I (and other CPFers) have strongly advocated from the git-go (trading veterans and playing kids mostly), some of which they've been forced into doing anyway (Diaz, Seo, "benching" Mienkiewicz), they wouldn't be much worse than they are now, plus they would have all the prospects that their superannuated starters would have brought--but they insisted that they're in the middle of tight pennant race, thus bringing maybe 5.000 extra fans to the ballpark under the false pretense that this is actually a decent team. But why? Is it just for the bucks?

I think it's more. I think this team allows its executives to cover their butts more than most teams tolerate. The dumb fucks decide that Matsui is a terrific shortstop? Solution: play him for a year at short, whatever he shows on the field Some stupid asshole decrees that Piazza's still got it? Solution: Bat him ahead of Wright for two or three months when everyone outside of Piazza's dad can see that isn't justified by their current skills. Some clueless jerk compounds that error by swapping Jason Phillips for Ishii? Have Ishii pitch in the rotation long after he's proven he can't do it. Some moron decides that to justify the Ishii deal, Seo will have to go to the minors to learn how to pitch? Solution: keep Seo in AAA for several months, even after he pitches well in the majors AND then in the minors while Ishii is stinking up the joint at Shea. I could go on and on (and have) with Heilman, with Benson, and several other bete noires, but the bottom line is this, whether Edgy likes me saying it or no: the Mets' organization is run by incompetants, who compound their mistakes by insisting they haven't made a mistake yet, and then perpetuate the obvious goofs in judgment rather than fess up and fix them. I disapprove of this policy.

KC
Aug 21 2005 10:57 AM

>>The real question is why do the Mets have such foolish policies? If they would have done various moves that I (and other CPFers) have strongly advocated from the git-go (trading veterans and playing kids mostly), some of which they've been forced into doing anyway (Diaz, Seo, "benching" Mienkiewicz), they wouldn't be much worse than they are now, plus they would have all the prospects that their superannuated starters would have brought--but they insisted that they're in the middle of tight pennant race, thus bringing maybe 5.000 extra fans to the ballpark under the false pretense that this is actually a decent team. But why? Is it just for the bucks?

I think it's more. I think this team allows its executives to cover their butts more than most teams tolerate. The dumb fucks decide that Matsui is a terrific shortstop? Solution: play him for a year at short, whatever he shows on the field Some stupid asshole decrees that Piazza's still got it? Solution: Bat him ahead of Wright for two or three months when everyone outside of Piazza's dad can see that isn't justified by their current skills. Some clueless jerk compounds that error by swapping Jason Phillips for Ishii? Have Ishii pitch in the rotation long after he's proven he can't do it. Some moron decides that to justify the Ishii deal, Seo will have to go to the minors to learn how to pitch? Solution: keep Seo in AAA for several months, even after he pitches well in the majors AND then in the minors while Ishii is stinking up the joint at Shea. I could go on and on (and have) with Heilman, with Benson, and several other bete noires, but the bottom line is this, whether Edgy likes me saying it or no: the Mets' organization is run by incompetants, who compound their mistakes by insisting they haven't made a mistake yet, and then perpetuate the obvious goofs in judgment rather than fess up and fix them. I disapprove of this policy.<<<


Now unless someone edits, deletes, modifies, moves, or otherwise tampers
with this "opinion of the Mets" than I guess you can post your "opinion
of the Mets". All the other stuff is boiled cabbage that no one cares about.

Bret Sabermetric
Aug 21 2005 11:04 AM

Edgy DC wrote:
(3) Let's try real hard to be the forum largely populated by people who disagree with each other and the organizaition without lightly accusing the forum or the organization of (a) being peopled by idiots who are making a choice no other organization would've, or (b) acting in bad faith.
.


Well, I care that the head honcho here explicitly calls for a Pollyanna-ish tone on this forum, just a few weeks after he claims (as you just did) that I'm free to state my aberrent opinions as I please.

A truly open-minded admin would just note that CPFers hold a wide variety of views. That's what I used to say when I was a big, all-puffed-up admin around here, anyway.

KC
Aug 21 2005 11:30 AM

Being denied the ability to post an opinion and whether or not you care for
a post by someone is two totally different issues.

The only interest I have in this whole thing is when someone claims they're
being censored or denied posting priveleges and it's simply not the case. I
take such accusations personally.

You obviously can post an opinion, and when someone claims otherwise it will be
pointed out.

Zvon
Aug 21 2005 12:35 PM

Let me reiterate an earlier point I made.

When that spot opened Willie said get me a lefty starter. He got one. He wanted that to work out. He went too long with it.
They stuck with Ishii so long because he was a left arm.
I really believe it was as simple as that.
Some managers are of the mindset that a certain formula with a pitching rotation works better than others.

This does not excuse the fact that the Mets could have much better helped themselves by having their own finger on their own pulse.

I may be a serious Met fan but Im not afraid to hear or speak the truth as I see it, or hear it from anothers perspective.
Opinions are just what they are, a persons view.
Adversity is a great thing when it comes to fantalk.

Theres always someone who is going to concentrate on and represent the negative side of things. I welcome such rants.

ScarletKnight41
Aug 21 2005 12:40 PM

I think it's an appropriate time for introductions.


Zvon - meet Bret, our resident curmudgeon. Judging from your post, I take it that you'll accept him for who he is and not be put off by his posts.

Bret - meet Zvon. He's a newbie, and a good one at that. Try not to scare him off in the first week.