Master Index of Archived Threads
Report: Baseball to try out instant replay.
metirish May 22 2008 02:31 PM |
|
|
Benjamin Grimm May 22 2008 02:33 PM |
Why is there such an epidemic of missed home run calls lately?
|
AG/DC May 22 2008 02:40 PM |
I would think they'd have to go with it in a full season minor league to get any real data on whether it works.
|
metsguyinmichigan May 22 2008 02:52 PM |
I was just amazed to see that one call go AGAINST the Yankees! I didn't think that every happened. No wonder AWuss looked so incredulous.
|
Willets Point May 22 2008 02:57 PM |
Funny that action is taken once a call goes against the Yankees.
|
Gwreck May 22 2008 03:07 PM |
I forget who (Jason Stark?) but someone had suggested a while ago that the umpiring crews should just expand by one so that the fifth umpire can be the official scorer and replay reviewer.
|
Willets Point May 22 2008 03:30 PM |
If instant replay is done it shouldn't be done with the TV cameras but with special umpire cameras that focus on places like the outfield wall and foul lines throughout the game. I also think it would be asking for trouble to use IR for checking ball/strike calls or tagouts on the basepaths, so I hope it is limited to the places where flying balls can easily fall out of eyesight of even the most vigilant umpire.
|
DocTee May 22 2008 04:31 PM |
A few years back there was a disputed HR call in a Marlins game (I watched it on ESPN--it was a holiday, maybe Memorial Day or Labor Day, more likely Independence Day I'm thinking) where the crew chief consulted the cameraman for confirmation (peering into the screen like an NFL official) to get the right call...and he was disciplined by the league. Anyone remember this?
|
Frayed Knot May 22 2008 09:05 PM |
|
A point almost no one has brought up (at least publicly) is that baseball - unlike the totally network televised NFL - has most of its TV cameras controlled by the home team and those cameras, plus any replays that come from them, are run by folks who have an interest in the outcome of that play and the games overall. I'm not against using IR for HRs in concept, but it's always much tougher to implement the system than it is to imagine it and it's at least as tough to limit it to the original guidelines once it's in place.
|
Elster88 May 23 2008 08:27 PM |
Great point by Gary. How long did Delgado's non-homer take after the discussion and arguments? Instant replay could speed up the games.
|
Frayed Knot May 23 2008 09:19 PM |
Umps blow another HR call in the Injuns-stRangers game tonight
|
batmagadanleadoff May 23 2008 09:42 PM |
I'm all for instant replay for those too close to call HR's/near-HR's. But the replay rule won't work as well when an umpire mistakenly calls a HR that shouldn't have been. In that instance, what do you do with the runners that might've been on base? I suppose that the batter will be credited with a ground rule double with all runners advancing two bases. But then the faster runners will claim that they could've scored had the play not been terminated by the botched HR call. And a fast runner (like our Reyes) might claim that he's been robbed of a triple.
|
Frayed Knot May 23 2008 09:54 PM |
Replay rules always work better in theory than in practice.
|
batmagadanleadoff May 23 2008 09:57 PM |
|
Doesn't everything?
|
Elster88 May 26 2008 08:34 PM |
|
It works good in tennis. Probably the easiest sport to use it in though.
|