Master Index of Archived Threads
Corner Outfielders
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 08:06 AM |
Not that it gets Willie off the hook --- in fact it indicts Omar Minaya to some extent for not being adequately prepared, and the medical training staff as well --- but the plague among our corner outfielders has been cruel and unkind. I'm happy for Tatis to be a contributor, but I am unhappy to have an unretired retread third baseman as our starting leftfielder. These are positions where you look to get offense.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 09 2008 08:25 AM |
All very true.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 08:33 AM |
It's not the soundness of bringing back Alou that I'm chagrinned with (we knew we rolling the dice), but the soundness of beta-plans like Brady Clark.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 09 2008 08:36 AM |
Well, I think Plan B was Pagan and Chavez. Plan C was probably Marlon Anderson and Brady Clark.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 08:37 AM |
Tatis as the "everyday" left fielder on this trip tells you what you need to know.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 08:42 AM |
|
See, I am saying brining Alou back was unsound, precisely because, as we've seen, faking it as an everyday CO is harder than it looks. I think it would be just as easy to bring in an everyday LF who isn't an injury risk than to find a reserve capable of assuming the awesome burden of relicating Alou's presence.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 09 2008 08:44 AM |
Or they can trade Oliver Perez for the best left-fielder they can manage to get, and tell Alou that he's a pinch-hitter, fill-in outfielder for the remainder of the season.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 08:48 AM |
I'd trade Alou in a hot second.
|
TheOldMole Jun 09 2008 08:54 AM |
It was pretty much the same last year. It's like the jock student's summation of history in The History Boys: History is just one fucking thing after another.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 09:00 AM |
|
OK, cleon. We'll clean house. Until then... it's just that Cincinnati always managed to have four-to-five big, bad outfielders ready for regular duty. Whenever Ken Griffey came off the DL, it was always a cryfest over who was going to sit. Why can't rich bitches like New York have that sort of soap opera?
|
Willets Point Jun 09 2008 09:01 AM |
||
Why are you calling Lunchbucket, cleon. He's much smarter than that.
|
Gwreck Jun 09 2008 09:03 AM |
|
They already have Alou's Mets predecessor in that role.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 09:04 AM |
|
Well, ballbusting is a sport too.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 09:16 AM |
||
Don't put me in a position to defend the bench. Nobody was less supportive than me of its makeup. But I think the problem is much more than a failure to support Alou, it's a matter of having Alou to support in the first place, and worse, the collateral damage that having to patch up the lineup for weeks at a time does to the season.
|
Vic Sage Jun 09 2008 09:32 AM |
i'm with Mr. Lunchbucket.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 09:33 AM |
Well, he's through with the fruits of TiTTS, that's for sure.
|
sharpie Jun 09 2008 09:33 AM |
I don't think re-signing Alou was necessarily the problem. It was that we had no credible full-time fourth outfielder in place a la Cincinnati. Were we so concerned that, say, Kenny Lofton would pout because he wasn't a full-timer that we opted to have the likes of Marlon Anderson as an outfield backup? Maybe that is what getting Angel Pagan was supposed to be about, but at the time it looked like he was headed to AAA since we had to keep Anderson and Chavez on the big team.
|
metirish Jun 09 2008 09:39 AM |
I remember the last time Alou was coming back to the team I posted how much Alou felt the team missed him and how him being back would be a calming influence on the team ,something like that anyhow, well it's the same again I think, yesterday Burckhardt was talking about Alou and how he thinks Mosis is a great litmus test as to how the team is doing and that Alou feels like he needs to get back before it becomes to late and they get buried in the standings.
|
Vic Sage Jun 09 2008 09:50 AM |
to which sour TiTT fruits are you referring -- the trade of young talent for Santana? the trade of young talent for Church & Schneider? I don't think either of those is the problem so far.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 09:52 AM |
Well, yeah, that's what I'm referring to. Or he's referring to.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 09 2008 10:04 AM |
Alou claiming he'll "definitely" be back Tuesday.
|
Gwreck Jun 09 2008 10:11 AM |
|
Could someone spell out this acronym for me?
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 10:12 AM |
The Trade in Tomorrow for Today Society.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 10:12 AM |
|
I'm referring to the fruit of TiTTs not being representative of TiTTs? I think maybe I should speak for myself.
|
Willets Point Jun 09 2008 10:15 AM |
|
A capital idea.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 10:20 AM |
You referred, specifically, to Pedro, Castro and Alou.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 10:24 AM |
As grumpy Met fans, I think we're manufacturing one. I withdraw Titty refernces.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 12:48 PM |
Chris Aguila recently hit six homers in four days, and has 16 total.
|
Vic Sage Jun 09 2008 12:59 PM |
|
now wait a second. I didn't bring up TiTTS. YOU did. I didn't switch the subject, which was Lunchbucket's objections (as i understand it) to filling the roster with broken down players. I was commenting on the inappropriateness of YOU switching the subject, which you did by obliquely referring to the objects of Johnny's scorn (you just specified Pedro, Castro and Alou) as TiTTS-type players. And they are not. You were taking an opportunity to slam TiTTS, in a situation that was not relevant to the discussion. So I attempted to point that out. But I'M the one accused of changing the subject? I was just correcting a misimpression that you put out there. None of the players Johnny was talking about were TiTTS-type players, and i gave current examples of TiTTS type acquisitions so as to distinguish them. While I was certainly not happy about the Church/Milledge deal,and have said so publicly and repeatedly, it was CLEARLY an example of a TiTTS-type move, and so far it seems to be working out. Between that and the Santana deal, it seems hard to make the case that a TiTTS philosophy is to blame for our current situation.
|
AG/DC Jun 09 2008 01:09 PM |
I withdrew the comment so as not to spiral in this direction.
|
bmfc1 Jun 10 2008 08:53 AM |
Erik Karabell made this comment today on espn.com:
|
attgig Jun 10 2008 09:32 AM |
looking at the NOZ's minor league [url=http://neworleans.zephyrs.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ibp&cid=588&stn=true&sid=t588]stats[/url], seems like this guy Valentino Pascucci is hitting pretty well also.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 09:36 AM |
That web page is no longer listing all players on the Zephyrs, as I discovered this morning.
|
Vic Sage Jun 10 2008 11:09 AM |
I looked up Pascucci's numbers, and it showed a player that made progress at every level until 2004, when, at age 25, Montreal gave him a cup of coffee. He didn't do mucn for the `Spos, and was then released after the season, and disappeared for 2 years (05-06), before popping up again in the Marlins system at AAA Albequerque with another solid year. Then he started this year slowly for the Phillies' AAA Int'l league time before hooking on with the Zephyrs, where he has been tearing it up.
|
metirish Jun 10 2008 11:21 AM |
||
From Wiki.
What did he do for the '05 season? oh hold on , that would mean he was with Chiba for 2005 and 06.
|
attgig Jun 10 2008 11:38 AM |
|
little sny [url=http://web.sny.tv/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080609&content_id=1463130&oid=36018&vkey=9]article [/url]on aguilla
|
attgig Jun 10 2008 11:43 AM |
|
and one on [url=http://web.sny.tv/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080601&content_id=1462237&oid=36018&vkey=31]Pascucci[/url]
|