Master Index of Archived Threads
Green jerseys on Jets day?
metsguyinmichigan Jun 09 2008 09:33 AM |
A uniform board I check out is abuzz about the Mets allegedly wearing green jerseys and white caps the night they honor the Jets. I've never heard that -- even up until the first game was rained out.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 09:38 AM |
Interesting, and no I hadn't.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 09 2008 09:51 AM |
I tried. You have to be an approved member to get access -- snobs! -- but there's not much more than what I said. It lacks a source.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 10:10 AM |
Oh, I see where you were. Yeah, not much meat on that bone.
|
Farmer Ted Jun 09 2008 10:39 AM |
Why are they honoring the Jets?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 09 2008 10:39 AM |
longtime tenant of big shea.
|
Farmer Ted Jun 09 2008 10:43 AM |
Interesting. Can't wait to see Richard Todd again.
|
G-Fafif Jun 09 2008 11:06 AM |
|
Officially speaking, no Richard Todd (he was gonna come, but he was intercepted on the way):
A one-night patch might be appropriate, but green and white jerseys? C'mon... They are selling overpriced Mets/Jets t-shirts at Shea ("Guaranteed. Amazin." Illustration of modern Shea, not the one the Jets played in.) for $28 and wildly overpriced sweatshirts (same design) for $70. The Mets never cared this much for the Jets when they were there.
|
OlerudOwned Jun 09 2008 05:33 PM |
|
MGiM, are we talking about Chris Creamer's board?
Ya never know, though.
|
MFS62 Jun 09 2008 06:36 PM |
|
That line should be remembered when we hand out the kudos. Later
|
SteveJRogers Jun 09 2008 06:45 PM |
|
Modern Shea with the neon ballplayers? Because the Jets were here when it became the Purple Palace. You are right about the Mets caring more now than when they played at Shea. Even Doubleday/Wilpon continued the harshness of the Grant era relationship. Who knows what might have been if the relationship through the years wasn't so frothy? Heh, Citi Field could have been the first dual-sport facility of the post-cookie cutter era!
|
seawolf17 Jun 09 2008 06:51 PM |
StevieJeets means "frosty," not "frothy," but I'd like to go on record and state that "frothy" is one of my favorite words of all time, as in, "a cold frothy beverage."
|
G-Fafif Jun 09 2008 07:00 PM |
The Jets indeed bled into the blue exterior era but the neon boys weren't installed until the big green men were long ensconced at the Meadowlands. Also, the modern Jet logo on the shirt doesn't match up with the Shea portrayed. The whole thing just doesn't come off Metically, Jetically or aesthetically.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 09 2008 08:30 PM |
||
Ah. Yup, that's where I saw it. Thought it sounded odd. Then again, these are the people who brought us the Mercury Mets...
|
Willets Point Jun 10 2008 05:58 AM |
When the Jets played at Shea:
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 06:03 AM |
For Jets day, they should roll out the field-level seats to the football configuration.
|
AG/DC Jun 10 2008 06:15 AM |
They had stopped doing that by the time I started paying attention. If you look at that last-season shot, the field level seats are still in place in their baseball diagonal positions and they've built some temporary extensions parallel to the sidelines.
|
Gwreck Jun 10 2008 06:24 AM |
The first of the pictures Willets posted does not appear to be of the Jets playing. Assuming it's a legitimate photo, it must be from one of those random soccer games they played there.
|
HahnSolo Jun 10 2008 06:54 AM |
|
It's a photoshop. You can see the Keyspan sign in left field.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 10 2008 07:14 AM |
Dynomite photo!
|
Farmer Ted Jun 10 2008 07:28 AM |
I think Shell needs to turn around NOW!!
|
metirish Jun 10 2008 07:29 AM |
Three ex Jets the night of the rain out.
|
AG/DC Jun 10 2008 07:37 AM |
I going with Bruce Harper and Wesley Walker for the last two. Don't have the first one.
|
Willets Point Jun 10 2008 07:43 AM |
|
That's Matt Snell, a running back and Jets lifer.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 10 2008 08:40 AM |
>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3010/2566068163_2fd9d98bd1.jpg?v=0
|
G-Fafif Jun 10 2008 12:25 PM |
|
First image is a Photoshop special. That Bud ad didn't exist in the Jets' day, nor the neon figures, nor...well, you get the picture.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 12:33 PM |
|
Here's what Wikipedia says:
There's nothing in the article about the Jets giving up on moving the field level seats, but what Edgy says about that does seem familiar. I also wonder when it was that the giant shingles came down? Was there a period in between the shingles and the neon? I don't remember such a time, but at the same time, it doesn't seem like we went right from one to the other.
|
G-Fafif Jun 10 2008 01:10 PM |
The shingles disappeared in 1980. I thought they were coming back. I guess they're not.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 01:15 PM |
I had a dream that I found the shingles, and was trying to convince Frank Cashen to hang them on the façade of Citi Field.
|
G-Fafif Jun 10 2008 01:18 PM |
Shove over Dr. King...somebody's had a dream even more awesome than yours.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 10 2008 02:43 PM |
They probably threw the shingles out!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 02:54 PM |
I'd love to have five or six of them hanging on the side of my house!
|
Gwreck Jun 10 2008 03:02 PM |
|
Try adding a zero to that. Word remains that seats from Shea will be sold off at $500/per when they tear it down.
|
HahnSolo Jun 10 2008 03:17 PM |
|
I don't know if it is true or not, as this is a friend of a friend kind of story from 20 years ago. But said friend of a friend (or relative), allegedly took a shingle from Shea back in the early 80s. He claims they were dumped at the bottom of one of the walk ways, behind a gate or door that happened to be unlocked while he went past. Went in, picked one up, and was gone. I was always dubious in that I imagine those would be awfully big to try to smuggle inside a shirt. Or maybe he was on his way out at the time.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 10 2008 03:22 PM |
I don't know how big they were, but my best guess/recollection would be that they were at least four feet by four feet. Perhaps six by six.
|