Master Index of Archived Threads
Mets players blueprint for the rest of the season
metirish Jun 11 2008 06:39 AM |
|
I just find this funny , straight out of Major League.
|
Methead Jun 11 2008 07:33 AM |
Hmm.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 08:03 AM |
We'll see.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 11 2008 08:20 AM |
On the SNY pregame show yesterday, Harold Reynolds was saying that he'd switch Reyes and Castillo in the batting order. I think his reason was that Reyes would get more pitches to hit if Castillo was on base ahead of him.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 11 2008 08:21 AM |
Oh, and Lee Mazzilli then said that he wouldn't move Reyes to the second hole.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 11 2008 08:25 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 11 2008 08:26 AM |
I completely agree with Edgy's blueprint. They play so wussily.
|
sharpie Jun 11 2008 08:25 AM |
If the new manager comes down to a choice between some guy down on the street and Lee Mazzilli I'm going with the guy on the street.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 08:32 AM |
|
This is so fucking true, they're probably going to have you killed for posting it. Desperate as they are, they still might try it, but maybe not until it's too late. He could be an Alfonzian force out of the two-hole.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 11 2008 09:27 AM |
|
I think this is a great idea; especially the way Reyes and Castillo have been playing this season. Another obstacle to this plan other than the one you already mentioned is that Randolph's philosophy is to use the #2 batter as an outmaker, a sac bunter. And under this strategy, misguided as it is, Randolph would never waste Reyes' at bats on sac bunts.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 11 2008 09:31 AM |
Which is exactly the reason it would be a great move: fewer sacrifice bunts.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 11 2008 09:33 AM Re: Mets players blueprint for the rest of the season |
|
For the same amount of ink, my blueprint would have the Mets winning all of the rest of their games. Why stop at 92? I'd make it airtight by throwing in an edict banning any other NL East team from winning more regular season games than the Mets. I'd also make all of Luis Castillo's bunts travel over the fence for a Home Run as if the baseball had some flubber or something.
|
metirish Jun 11 2008 09:41 AM |
|
Unnamed sources say Omar wrote that . .620 baseball the rest of the way , I can't wait.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 11 2008 09:44 AM |
Well, yesterday's loss means they'll have to play .626 to get to 92 wins. (And who says 92 will be enough.)
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 10:17 AM |
Darryl says Chemistry + Consistency + Getting Things Rolling + Clicking + Different Personalitites = Championship.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 11 2008 11:02 AM |
The problem I see with Castillo ahead of Reyes -- can he still run? Do you want a guy with no knees clogging the bases before your fastest runner?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 11 2008 11:07 AM |
He can run fine. Having better success stealing than Reyes btw.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 11:09 AM |
He's fast enough to stay out of the way of the guy behind him.
|
Rockin' Doc Jun 11 2008 11:16 AM |
The Mets need to stop giving up outs and playing for single runs and instead start playing aggressively for the big inning. They need to stop playing to win and start playing to kick the opponents ass. This team has lost it's swagger and shows no signs of getting it back. Sac bunting and playing for single runs is not going to get the swagger back, even if it leads to wins (which it hasn't for the past year basically).
|
Centerfield Jun 11 2008 11:17 AM |
I hate sacrifice bunts too, but let's not pretend that the Mets' struggles this year are because of our propensity to bunt (although it certainly doesn't help). We suck because we rank 13th out of 16 teams in OPS.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 11:24 AM |
Oh, I think playing for one run is hurting the overall OPS --- not just in a psychobabbly think-small/be-small way, although I don't think that's baseless --- but in a law-of-unintended-consequences way.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 11:27 AM |
I think the Mets' playing for one run hurts the OPS, the GPS, the GPO, the GNP, and a handful of NGOs we've never heard of.
|
Centerfield Jun 11 2008 11:32 AM |
Maybe, but even so, where would we be with an aggressive attitude? 11th? Even 10th? We still don't even sniff the upper half.
|
AG/DC Jun 11 2008 11:38 AM |
Well, it's no secret that they're a losing team, with disappointing performance. The question is what approach would improve performance. I think the bullpen was so bolluxed last September, they were desperate, and they seem that way now.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 11 2008 11:52 AM |
I think the no-talent thing is also an issue, but not necessarily a separate one. I mean, last night they bunted Schneid so as to set up Endy F. Chavez and his .250 OBP. They wanted us to get excited now that they'd reactivated Marlon Anderson, who is making outs at better than .800 pace. No bench player, but for Castro & Pagan, have an OBP of .300.
|
metirish Jun 11 2008 12:05 PM |
|
So spoke Minaya when asked about Willie's job status , this was after leaving a long meeting with Willie , Peterson , Conti and Barnazard after the game last night. Exactly, nothing has changed.
|
Rockin' Doc Jun 11 2008 03:09 PM |
Well, Omar's right on that count. The Mets were a sub-.500 team two weeks ago and they are a sub-.500 team now. They were listless and losing most of the close games then, and they're still listless and losing most of the close games. Nothing has really changed over the past two weeks.
|