Aug 18 2008 10:16 PM
Master Index of Archived Threads
Baby Head Bands
Baby head bands
| Cute! | 3 votes |
| Stupid looking | 13 votes |
| cooby Aug 18 2008 10:16 PM |
|
|
| Nymr83 Aug 18 2008 11:21 PM |
|
stupid looking.
|
| cooby Aug 19 2008 06:40 AM |
|
I agree, but no offense meant to this charming little girl, I'm sure.
|
| Fman99 Aug 19 2008 07:14 AM |
|
I'd beg to differ. Some of them are used to cute effect (see Fgirl below).
|
| AG/DC Aug 19 2008 07:20 AM |
|
A cloth band that pulls actual hair back on a toddler and a frilly giftwrap band on a baldy infant are two differmint things.
|
| cooby Aug 19 2008 07:21 AM |
|
Ah, but the difference is the Fgirl (whom I remember admiring before) has beautiful brown curls, and a headband sets them off to a tee.
|
| soupcan Aug 19 2008 07:50 AM |
|
Stupid looking on bald babies.
|
| Fman99 Aug 19 2008 08:09 AM |
|
|
Well thanks for the kinds words Coob. I'd agree on all counts. Mothers feel the need to do this so strangers will be able to identify their Charlie-Brown-esque infant/toddler as a girl. Stupid-looking.
|
| sharpie Aug 19 2008 08:44 AM |
|
My daughter wore one to a friend's wedding. She never wore it before or after but it looked pretty cute there so I have to vote "cute."
|
| seawolf17 Aug 19 2008 09:00 AM |
|
If I could vote "stupid looking" twice, I would. Awful, awful.
|
| metsmarathon Aug 19 2008 09:54 AM |
|
on a nearly hairless baby - stupid looking. if you're concerned about the gender-identity of your hairless baby, i would suggest that the better strategy for declaring the sex of your offspring would be to cover him or her in gender appropriate colorings, patterns, and images, as opposed to adorning the adorable thing with useless decorations.
|
| Rockin' Doc Aug 19 2008 11:23 AM |
|
I have never been a fan of the Slick Watts look on infants. I wasn't much of a fan of it for Watts either, but at least it served a purpose in his case.
|
