Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
- Bob Alpacadaca
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:21 pm
Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Supposedly the Mets have checked in on Guerrero. The Jays need to decide whether they will build around him and sign to a long-term deal, or watch him walk after the season.
Story said Mets could offer a nice prospect package to the Jays. He’s just 25. I’d want to trade then extend rather than watch him walk. But who knows?
Might be a reason they are in no rush to sign Pete.
Story said Mets could offer a nice prospect package to the Jays. He’s just 25. I’d want to trade then extend rather than watch him walk. But who knows?
Might be a reason they are in no rush to sign Pete.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Let's hope the X-rays are ok if this does happen
- TheNextMetsManager
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:29 pm
- Frayed Knot
- Posts: 15573
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
<golf clap>
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
- Johnny Lunchbucket
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:02 am
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Is this the ultimate Alonso leverage play?
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
I do think you at least need to give the impression of having a plan B, although I'm inclined to think the Jays are planning to contend this year.
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 9060
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
I suspect that Santander is the Plan B. And the Mets don't want to continue dithering with Pete and have Santander slip through their fingers.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Mets to Boras: "We can strategically leak information too."
Got my hair cut correct like Anthony Mason
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
I've been operating under the idea that it was Bregman, and not Santander, as the plan B. I think those are the two most accomplished hitters left on the FA market. Based on 2024 WAR they are, anyway.Benjamin Grimm wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:25 am I suspect that Santander is the Plan B. And the Mets don't want to continue dithering with Pete and have Santander slip through their fingers.
Don't know if it matters, but Bregman is also a Boras client. Santander is not, at least if you believe what the Googles tell you
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 9060
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
And as for Vlad Jr., if he's going to be a Met, I think it's far more likely to happen in 2026 than 2025. Especially if Pete leaves and they go with a makeshift approach at first base in 2025.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Vlad Jr. doesn’t need to be talked about any longer — 14-year, $500 million extension with the Blue Jays widely reported as done.
Hope for the best. Expect the Mets.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
They finally get someone to take their money, good for them , and Vladdy
- Marshmallowmilkshake
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:02 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
One less potential suitor for Pete next year - and one less potential Mets target at Pete's position next year.
- roger_that
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 9:17 am
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Pete will always have suitors.
He can always choose to accept a longer-term, more-money contract from any of them than he will ever get from the Mets. If we didn't offer him the six- or eight- or whatever-year deal Boras sought last year, we're certainly not going to offer it to him this year or any year, no matter how well his 2025 turns out. To stay with the Mets, he's going to be on a lucrative but very short term lease from here on in. Or lower his sights on the money he's seeking. But there are always going to be better offers out there.
He can always choose to accept a longer-term, more-money contract from any of them than he will ever get from the Mets. If we didn't offer him the six- or eight- or whatever-year deal Boras sought last year, we're certainly not going to offer it to him this year or any year, no matter how well his 2025 turns out. To stay with the Mets, he's going to be on a lucrative but very short term lease from here on in. Or lower his sights on the money he's seeking. But there are always going to be better offers out there.
Are you curious who the woman in my avatar is? She has nothing to do with the Mets but everything to do with this website.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
It's a lot of money for a guy who's essentially had two elite seasons (2021, 2024) and one decent one (2022) in his first six years in the bigs
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 9060
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
It would have been good to have seen him as a Met, but I never thought it was likely. Even as wealthy as Cohen is, I didn't think he'd commit to mega contracts in two consecutive winters. And it's good that Vlad will remain a Blue Jay. I like seeing a player commit to his original team for the long-term, and I'm also glad that Vlad won't be a Yankee or a Dodger.
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Big money to spend to commit to the team that just got swept by the Mets.
Got my hair cut correct like Anthony Mason
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
This.Benjamin Grimm wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 10:07 am I'm also glad that Vlad won't be a Yankee or a Dodger.
Later
“The measure of a man is what he does with power”- Plato
Apparently one did. He can't get away from the tell.
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
Apparently one did. He can't get away from the tell.
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
- roger_that
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 9:17 am
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
And Yankee fans and Dodger fans are giddy that he's not going to be a Met.
Are you curious who the woman in my avatar is? She has nothing to do with the Mets but everything to do with this website.
- The Hot Corner
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2019 4:15 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
With Vlad Jr. off the board, Pete clearly moves to the head of next season's Free Agent class of 1st baseman next season. Boras has to be salivating after Vlad Jr's deal.
When did the choices get so hard
With so much more at stake
Life gets mighty precious
When there's less of it to waste
With so much more at stake
Life gets mighty precious
When there's less of it to waste
- Marshmallowmilkshake
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:02 pm
Re: Are we talking about Vlad Guerrero Jr.?
Boy, I don't know. Vlad is much younger and we see what happened to Pete last year. Don't get me wrong, I hope Pete has a monster season. But I don't think a 32-year-old righthanded first baseman is going to get even half of that next year.The Hot Corner wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 6:56 pm With Vlad Jr. off the board, Pete clearly moves to the head of next season's Free Agent class of 1st baseman next season. Boras has to be salivating after Vlad Jr's deal.