The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post Reply
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:48 pm

32 years old next month. He had by far his best season last season in San Diego. (.280/.380/.459 with 24 homers.) Has also played for the Rockies, A's, and Rangers. He hit a three-run homer of Max Scherzer at Citi Field in Game One of the 2022 Wild Card Series. He's played 549 big-league games in the outfield, mostly in left field. Plus 219 games at second base, 104 at shortstop, 89 at third base and 72 at first. He's represented, like seemingly everyone else, by Boras. His nickname is "El Patron".
User avatar
MFS62
Posts: 9896
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:08 am

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by MFS62 » Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:17 pm

A good year last year - his other decent years were 5 and 6 years ago.
I don't prefer Profar.
Pass

OE: I preferred Santander, but he just signed with Tarana'.
Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32964
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Edgy MD » Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:42 pm

Utility infielder is the only place we don't currently already have a guy without options holding the fort.
User avatar
DocTee
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 9:30 am

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by DocTee » Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:50 pm

If they opt for Profar it means the end of OMG, yes?
User avatar
Cowtipper
Posts: 2243
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:06 pm

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Cowtipper » Mon Jan 20, 2025 2:15 pm

A one-year wonder who was a terrible disappoint in the whole decade leading up to that single year.

A former #1 rated prospect who, by and large, has been a total dud relative to what was expected of him.

Stay away.
User avatar
Gwreck
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:38 am

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Gwreck » Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:05 pm

Edgy MD wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:42 pm Utility infielder is the only place we don't currently already have a guy without options holding the fort.
And also First, Third, and Catcher? (I don’t expect Vientos or Alvarez to lose their jobs, but they should still have options, yes?)
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32964
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Edgy MD » Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:27 pm

I believe Vientos has burned his last option. Álvarez is indeed demotable, but even should that come to pass, the current minor conflict of seven outfielders without options is still unchanged.
User avatar
Gwreck
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:38 am

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Gwreck » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:05 pm

I only count 6: Nimmo, Siri, Soto, Taylor, Winker, Marte.

It does rankle me a bit that the team only found room to carry one backup infielder last year and is headed there again. I remain hopeful though that without a DH who cannot play in the field (see, e.g., Martinez, Vogelbach) they can use the DH slot as occasional “rest” for the infielders as well.
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32964
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Edgy MD » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:51 pm

Gwreck wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:05 pm I only count 6: Nimmo, Siri, Soto, Taylor, Winker, Marte.
José Azocar is the option-less Mets outfielder on the outside looking in.
User avatar
Lefty Specialist
Posts: 5962
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Lefty Specialist » Tue Jan 21, 2025 5:05 am

Ummmmm.....no.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
User avatar
Fman99
Posts: 6771
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:43 pm

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Fman99 » Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:00 am

This is just a leverage ploy against Boras regarding Bregman/Alonso, I would venture to guess.

Profar is a former Boras client who bounced to other representation last year. Not sure if that matters but it seems like it might here.
User avatar
Bob Alpacadaca
Posts: 457
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:21 pm

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by Bob Alpacadaca » Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:09 pm

Talk no more. He's a Brave.
User avatar
metirish
Posts: 5202
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:50 pm

Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar

Post by metirish » Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:22 pm

Three years and $42 million says Passan
Post Reply